RC Explanations- Cambridge vs. LSATBlog vs. Other Forum
- bizzybone1313
- Posts: 1001
- Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2012 4:31 pm
RC Explanations- Cambridge vs. LSATBlog vs. Other
I take way too long to review my reading comprehension sections, so I am looking to purchase either the Cambridge, LSAT Blog or some other RC explanations. Have any of you bought these explanations? If you have, why is it the best?
Thanks.
Thanks.
- bizzybone1313
- Posts: 1001
- Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2012 4:31 pm
Re: RC Explanations- Cambridge vs. LSATBlog vs. Other
Bump. Anyone?
- bizzybone1313
- Posts: 1001
- Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2012 4:31 pm
-
- Posts: 257
- Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 3:26 pm
Re: RC Explanations- Cambridge vs. LSATBlog vs. Other
The content of the explanations is the same, as they were written by the same authors. They only differ in the formatting and that you can purchase explanations for individual sections through our site. You can check out the freebies to see if you find them helpful:
June 2007 LSAT Explanations
June 2007 LSAT Explanations
- bizzybone1313
- Posts: 1001
- Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2012 4:31 pm
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- bizzybone1313
- Posts: 1001
- Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2012 4:31 pm
Re: RC Explanations- Cambridge vs. LSATBlog vs. Other
I know I can't be the only one with this problem.
- cahwc12
- Posts: 942
- Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 4:49 pm
Re: RC Explanations- Cambridge vs. LSATBlog vs. Other
Your question was already answered but you keep bumping, and the whole premise of your post is silly. This isn't a memorization test and you're not going to glean factoids by being told what the answers are to passages you read months ago.
You should have been reviewing these passages later in or the next day, not weeks and months later.
(Those RC explanations are just fine, by the way, and I don't think you really have another viable choice anyway.)
You should have been reviewing these passages later in or the next day, not weeks and months later.
(Those RC explanations are just fine, by the way, and I don't think you really have another viable choice anyway.)