Top Law Schools

What do u guys do when some dumb attorney tells u that LSAT has nothing to do with becoming an attorney and just because u score on a 170 range u probably gonna do bad in law school?

I do some tutoring but...

Who gives a fuck what some shitlaw attorney says? Just tell him you hear an ambulance and he'll run off.

natashka85 wrote:What do u guys do when some dumb attorney tells u that LSAT has nothing to do with becoming an attorney and just because u score on a 170 range u probably gonna do bad in law school?

That statement was directed at you, and not 170 scorers at large. He may be correct.

well,who gives a fuck what some shit attorney says,all I know if u can score a 170 u can kick any attorney`s ass,cause most of them make shaky arguments and u can spot that,they say that because they don`t like to be beaten,and that`s the truth.

natashka85 wrote:well,who gives a fuck what some shit attorney says,all I know if u can score a 170 u can kick any attorney`s ass,cause most of them make shaky arguments and u can spot that,they say that because they don`t like to be beaten,and that`s the truth.

yeah man, i got a 176 on lsat and can argue good. pffft if some ambulense chaser is gonna tell me i cant do good in law school

florida1949 wrote:

natashka85 wrote:well,who gives a fuck what some shit attorney says,all I know if u can score a 170 u can kick any attorney`s ass,cause most of them make shaky arguments and u can spot that,they say that because they don`t like to be beaten,and that`s the truth.

yeah man, i got a 176 on lsat and can argue good. pffft if some ambulense chaser is gonna tell me i cant do good in law school

Thank u bro ,encouraging statement they get jealous and wanna break your soul ,I won't let them do that to me.

natashka85 wrote:Subject: Question for LSAT instructors

cahwc12 wrote:

natashka85 wrote:What do u guys do when some dumb attorney tells u that LSAT has nothing to do with becoming an attorney and just because u score on a 170 range u probably gonna do bad in law school?

That statement was directed at you, and not 170 scorers at large. He may be correct.

What do u mean can u be more specific?

Is that statement true coming from a shitlaw boomer attorney to 170 scorers at large? Of course not.

What I meant is that this attorney's comments may have been specifically targeted at you. This attorney may feel that despite whatever LSAT score you get (170+ or not), you may still do poorly in law school because you specifically are bad for whatever reason. Whether or not this attorney knows anything about you is uncertain, but he may have had a well-reasoned argument. Given a single sentence without context it's tough to say.

cahwc12 wrote:

natashka85 wrote:Subject: Question for LSAT instructors

cahwc12 wrote:

natashka85 wrote:What do u guys do when some dumb attorney tells u that LSAT has nothing to do with becoming an attorney and just because u score on a 170 range u probably gonna do bad in law school?

That statement was directed at you, and not 170 scorers at large. He may be correct.

What do u mean can u be more specific?

Is that statement true coming from a shitlaw boomer attorney to 170 scorers at large? Of course not.

What I meant is that this attorney's comments may have been specifically targeted at you. This attorney may feel that despite whatever LSAT score you get (170+ or not), you may still do poorly in law school because you specifically are bad for whatever reason. Whether or not this attorney knows anything about you is uncertain, but he may have had a well-reasoned argument. Given a single sentence without context it's tough to say.

Actually I was in Starbucks and she came up to me and started a conversation ,she didnt know anything about me , she made a bad argument by stating sth about some attorneys which i negated by saying that some attorneys dont represent most attorneys or all attorneys,she just said her ex boyfriend got a 175 on the lsat and couldn`t pass the bar,she even said that GRE is even harder than the LSAT ,but she was freaking dumb from what I understood about her arguments ,she made lots of wrong assumptions while she was talking ,this is all I can say.

I have no idea what's going on.

1) Is English your first language?
2) Why did you assume she was an attorney? If some asshat tells you you'll suck at law school and you don't know them, why the fuck would you entertain that for a second?

fruitoftheloom wrote:1) Is English your first language?
2) Why did you assume she was an attorney? If some asshat tells you you'll suck at law school and you don't know them, why the fuck would you entertain that for a second?

Yes it is,I don`t give a fuck about that dumb attorney,cause I am not a sheep and never do anything that someone tells me to do.
Just because she says that doesn`t mean its the case.
Also I hate beng among litigation attorneys most of them are jealous of each other and devious.

natashka85 wrote:

fruitoftheloom wrote:1) Is English your first language?
2) Why did you assume she was an attorney? If some asshat tells you you'll suck at law school and you don't know them, why the fuck would you entertain that for a second?

Yes it is,I don`t give a fuck about that dumb attorney,cause I am not a sheep and never do anything that someone tells me to do.
Just because she says that doesn`t mean its the case.
Also I hate beng among litigation attorneys most of them are jealous of each other and devious.

Yeah I never do anything that people tell me to either. It's always a bad idea to listen to others. Absolutely. Tell me to eat vegetables? I feed them to the dog. Tell me to see a doctor about this green and black infected looking abscess on my arm? Now, I am definitely not going.

Those damn litigating attorneys. Devious and jealous . . .

natashka85 wrote: Just because she says that doesn`t mean its the case.
Also I hate beng among litigation attorneys most of them are jealous of each other and devious.

Reading comprehension is not your strong suit. Neither is typing.

fruitoftheloom wrote:

natashka85 wrote: Just because she says that doesn`t mean its the case.
Also I hate beng among litigation attorneys most of them are jealous of each other and devious.

Reading comprehension is not your strong suit. Neither is typing.

He makes up for his weaknesses with a keen intellect though.

fruitoftheloom wrote:

natashka85 wrote: Just because she says that doesn`t mean its the case.
Also I hate beng among litigation attorneys most of them are jealous of each other and devious.

Reading comprehension is not your strong suit. Neither is typing.

I know i am exhausted from studying that`s why I can`t type with accuracy,have to confess.

natashka85 wrote:

fruitoftheloom wrote:

natashka85 wrote: Just because she says that doesn`t mean its the case.
Also I hate beng among litigation attorneys most of them are jealous of each other and devious.

Reading comprehension is not your strong suit. Neither is typing.

I know i am exhausted from studying that`s why I can`t type with accuracy,have to confess.

That‘s all right. We‘re all on the same page as you. Litigation attorneys are all jealous of each other and devious for sure. Don‘t listen to them.

gguuueessttt wrote:

natashka85 wrote:

fruitoftheloom wrote:

natashka85 wrote: Just because she says that doesn`t mean its the case.
Also I hate beng among litigation attorneys most of them are jealous of each other and devious.

Reading comprehension is not your strong suit. Neither is typing.

I know i am exhausted from studying that`s why I can`t type with accuracy,have to confess.

That‘s all right. We‘re all on the same page as you. Litigation attorneys are all jealous of each other and devious for sure. Don‘t listen to them.

Are you stalking me?

PickledPanda wrote:
Are you stalking me?

No I just click 'Latest Posts' every 5 minutes and post in the ones I find interesting...
(I mean yes).

gguuueessttt wrote:

PickledPanda wrote:
Are you stalking me?

(I mean yes).