Page 1 of 1

Zones is a bad game

Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2012 9:44 pm
by msmith19
2/6 on zones. Regular -0 to -2 on LG. Zones is a bad game. It is written in such an absurdly stupid ambiguous manner and I'm not sure what that's trying to actually test. It's not even a hard game if you rewrite it in sensible terms.

Zones was a shot in the dark for most test takers. They either guessed right and got on the good side of the curve or guessed wrong. Hurray to LSAC for making such a pointless and ambiguous question that makes or breaks the administration for consistent test takers.

/rant

Re: Zones is a bad game

Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2012 9:45 pm
by Br3v
I forgot we could go back and read it now, I am going to look to see if it was as bad as I remembered

Re: Zones is a bad game

Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2012 9:46 pm
by msmith19
Br3v wrote:I forgot we could go back and read it now, I am going to look to see if it was as bad as I remembered
It is almost as bad. I spent a long time just trying to understand what each question was asking and what each rule actually meant. Add the fact that it's test day, along with the last 6 questions of the entire test and you have a recipe for disaster.

Re: Zones is a bad game

Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2012 9:52 pm
by gianna
Does anyone mind sending me the zones page? I have an undisclosed test and I've been dying to see how hellish this game was.