Page 1 of 1

!Kung

Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2012 12:34 pm
by LionelHutzJD
Their was a !kung passage? Why did i decide on December!??? I've studied the !kung for two years now....pointless thread is pointless.

Re: !Kung

Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2012 2:21 pm
by radar714
the anthro major in my was dying during that passage...

although I always find passages on subjects that I have studied to be incredibly distracting and more difficult

Re: !Kung

Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2012 2:22 pm
by abcde12345
Do you really know about !Kung? If so, fuck you. (No offense meant.)

Re: !Kung

Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2012 2:29 pm
by MustacheMarshall
radar714 wrote:the anthro major in my was dying during that passage...
haha completely agree. It was like a huge F you to everyone who told me my Anthro degree was basically useless!

Re: !Kung

Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2012 2:49 pm
by CalAlumni
I still don't understand the significance of the ! but overall I thought the RC was the easiest of all the 60's PT's.

Re: !Kung

Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2012 2:51 pm
by goden
The more relevant question is

did you major in zoning?

Re: !Kung

Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2012 2:55 pm
by bitsy
zoning makes me want to abandon my dream of a joint JD/MUP

Re: !Kung

Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2012 3:46 pm
by Charlie.Home
I would much rather bomb the !Kung passage than have to study !Kung for two years.

Re: !Kung

Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2012 3:56 pm
by toothbrush
Am I the only one who cannot articulate anything about !Kung except for the fact that they appeared in an LSAT passage?

I have no clue what the hell they are. A tribe of sorts, but that's all I got.

Re: !Kung

Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2012 4:03 pm
by Eberry
CalAlumni wrote:I still don't understand the significance of the ! but overall I thought the RC was the easiest of all the 60's PT's.

Someone on here said the '!' represents a 'click'ing noise.

Re: !Kung

Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2012 4:07 pm
by CyanIdes Of March
radar714 wrote:the anthro major in my was dying during that passage...

although I always find passages on subjects that I have studied to be incredibly distracting and more difficult
I tend to like passages I have prior knowledge over, it helps me put the argument into context and reduces the chance of me misunderstanding something. Usually if I see a Greek/Roman passage I do pretty well over it.

Re: !Kung

Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2012 4:26 pm
by nick_scheu
toothbrush wrote:Am I the only one who cannot articulate anything about !Kung except for the fact that they appeared in an LSAT passage?

I have no clue what the hell they are. A tribe of sorts, but that's all I got.
No, you're not. I actually thought they were an Asian or Pacific Islander group for a while.

Re: !Kung

Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2012 4:46 pm
by Poo-T
I'm pretty sure I watched a documentary on these people in my ANTH class last year.

lol they silly

Re: !Kung

Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2012 6:22 pm
by Charlie.Home
I couldn't articulate what a !KUNG was immediately after reading the damn passage

Re: !Kung

Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2012 7:30 pm
by ws81086n
CyanIdes Of March wrote:
radar714 wrote:the anthro major in my was dying during that passage...

although I always find passages on subjects that I have studied to be incredibly distracting and more difficult
I tend to like passages I have prior knowledge over, it helps me put the argument into context and reduces the chance of me misunderstanding something. Usually if I see a Greek/Roman passage I do pretty well over it.
Totally agree. Political Philosophy is a hobby of mine, and when I came to passage on anarchism and civil disobedience the other day with 4 minutes to go, I finished the passage and questions with a minute to spare. Here's to a passage comparing ancient and modern political philosophy come December.

Re: !Kung

Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2012 9:31 pm
by PeanutsNJam
ws81086n wrote:
CyanIdes Of March wrote:
radar714 wrote:the anthro major in my was dying during that passage...

although I always find passages on subjects that I have studied to be incredibly distracting and more difficult
I tend to like passages I have prior knowledge over, it helps me put the argument into context and reduces the chance of me misunderstanding something. Usually if I see a Greek/Roman passage I do pretty well over it.
Totally agree. Political Philosophy is a hobby of mine, and when I came to passage on anarchism and civil disobedience the other day with 4 minutes to go, I finished the passage and questions with a minute to spare. Here's to a passage comparing ancient and modern political philosophy come December.
I'm a biology major and I tend to find the science passages super easy. Definitely, having an anthro/science/philosophy major helps heaps on at least one of the RC (because the material is so familiar).

Re: !Kung

Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2012 9:36 pm
by nick_scheu
I'm a political science major, but I also find the science RC section easiest, when there is one. I used to read a lot of popular science (Brian Greene style) books, so that probably helps.

Re: !Kung

Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2012 11:34 pm
by jgconte
radar714 wrote:the anthro major in my was dying during that passage...

although I always find passages on subjects that I have studied to be incredibly distracting and more difficult
I second this. I read a passage about Groupthink once and had written a paper on it back in college. My brain went into 'i know this shit' mode, and I ended fucking up a couple questions.

Re: !Kung

Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2012 12:03 am
by ws81086n
I think provided one is careful not to bring one's own views into the passage, it should be helpful, not hurtful. It just makes digesting the material much easier. Either way, groupthink was a very difficult passage IMO.