December 2012 Re-takers

Prepare for the LSAT or discuss it with others in this forum.
Post Reply
User avatar
Lenahan3

Bronze
Posts: 264
Joined: Fri May 11, 2012 12:57 am

Re: December 2012 Re-takers

Post by Lenahan3 » Tue Nov 06, 2012 12:20 am

NoodleyOne wrote:COUNTER PROPOSAL then.
Idc enough to accept the proposal. I bet Mrizza will though.

User avatar
GabeQuixote

Bronze
Posts: 206
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2012 11:26 pm

Re: December 2012 Re-takers

Post by GabeQuixote » Tue Nov 06, 2012 12:22 am

Lenahan3 wrote:
NoodleyOne wrote:COUNTER PROPOSAL then.
Idc enough to accept the proposal. I bet Mrizza will though.
I think having a 180 is reward enough as it is.

As would being able to choose Noodley's avatar.

Sure it's likely he'll be choosing yours so you should be able to choose his if you:

-beat his raw score
-tie or beat his scaled score

User avatar
99.9luft

Silver
Posts: 1234
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2010 4:32 pm

Re: December 2012 Re-takers

Post by 99.9luft » Tue Nov 06, 2012 12:24 am

another bet: any straight male that scores below a 170 in Dec. will get dick-slapped by Worm.

Negative reinforcement, bitches.

User avatar
bitsy

Bronze
Posts: 195
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 8:06 pm

Re: December 2012 Re-takers

Post by bitsy » Tue Nov 06, 2012 12:24 am

HawkeyeGirl wrote:Another question: Cambridge Law 68-69 q26. I don't know why c isn't right. Isn't C the whole point of the passage? I get how B is correct, I just don't see how C is wrong. Thanks
haha i put the same thing. according to the kaplan explanation, we cannot infer that any of the current rules in place do not date back to the common law--as it says in the last sentence, the nonexclusion principle is a presumption, not a rule. from the text, we only have evidence that some of the old common law rules were abandoned.

User avatar
HawkeyeGirl

Bronze
Posts: 459
Joined: Sun May 06, 2012 9:13 pm

Re: December 2012 Re-takers

Post by HawkeyeGirl » Tue Nov 06, 2012 12:25 am

Lenahan3 wrote:
NoodleyOne wrote:COUNTER PROPOSAL then.
Idc enough to accept the proposal. I bet Mrizza will though.
If he won't sober, he definitely will when he's drunk. Most confident and persistent drunk I've ever seen lol

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


User avatar
gguuueessttt

Bronze
Posts: 473
Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2012 5:18 pm

Re: December 2012 Re-takers

Post by gguuueessttt » Tue Nov 06, 2012 12:26 am

GabeQuixote wrote:
1TLStudent wrote:noodley, you have any advice for how to cut down RC time? I get between -2/-0 for RC untimed (40 min roughly) and ive been averaging -6/-7 when I time it..i already dont make any notes so I cant cut time their. I just read and maybe make a couple in text notations/ underline
That's why I'm doing RC passages in 7 minutes . . . read it through quickly, for content and understanding once then go to the questions.

I averaged -1 per RC section without having to go back to the passage.
I think gabe's advice is good. This is what I did with games in October because I wanted to make sure I wouldn't feel rushed. I had run out of time on games in a couple of practice sections and I was doing similarly to you, score-wise (-0 untimed, -4ish timed).Ended up working really well, and I finished the Oct games section with around 5 minutes to spare.

User avatar
Cobretti

Gold
Posts: 2593
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 12:45 am

Re: December 2012 Re-takers

Post by Cobretti » Tue Nov 06, 2012 12:27 am

HawkeyeGirl wrote:
Lenahan3 wrote:
NoodleyOne wrote:COUNTER PROPOSAL then.
Idc enough to accept the proposal. I bet Mrizza will though.
If he won't sober, he definitely will when he's drunk. Most confident and persistent drunk I've ever seen lol
mrizza wrote:
NoodleyOne wrote:
GabeQuixote wrote:
NoodleyOne wrote:So, as additional motivation...

Anyone want to make an avatar bet with me? Beat my score, pick my avatar. Don't beat my score, I pick yours.
There's only one three digit combination that could beat yours . . .
Yup... it's certainly a tall order. A few of you are already aiming that high though.
If bitsy comes up with new terms for our bet, so i'm no longer in a tar bet with her... i'll take the bet if tie goes to me. The LSAT has made me so masochistic...
Did no one read this? I feel like I'm taking crazy pills

User avatar
HawkeyeGirl

Bronze
Posts: 459
Joined: Sun May 06, 2012 9:13 pm

Re: December 2012 Re-takers

Post by HawkeyeGirl » Tue Nov 06, 2012 12:28 am

bitsy wrote:
HawkeyeGirl wrote:Another question: Cambridge Law 68-69 q26. I don't know why c isn't right. Isn't C the whole point of the passage? I get how B is correct, I just don't see how C is wrong. Thanks
haha i put the same thing. according to the kaplan explanation, we cannot infer that any of the current rules in place do not date back to the common law--as it says in the last sentence, the nonexclusion principle is a presumption, not a rule. from the text, we only have evidence that some of the old common law rules were abandoned.
:\ I guess... I feel like I'd always pick c still. It says in the passage "Bentham's prescription was revolutionary" Whatever LSAT...

User avatar
bitsy

Bronze
Posts: 195
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 8:06 pm

Re: December 2012 Re-takers

Post by bitsy » Tue Nov 06, 2012 12:29 am

mrizza wrote:
NoodleyOne wrote:
GabeQuixote wrote:
NoodleyOne wrote:So, as additional motivation...

Anyone want to make an avatar bet with me? Beat my score, pick my avatar. Don't beat my score, I pick yours.
There's only one three digit combination that could beat yours . . .
Yup... it's certainly a tall order. A few of you are already aiming that high though.
If bitsy comes up with new terms for our bet, so i'm no longer in a tar bet with her... i'll take the bet if tie goes to me. The LSAT has made me so masochistic...
what do you want from me? i came up with your half. alternatively, in case of your loss, instead of a full shave, you could let the chats determine the course of your facial hair. im voting fu manchu.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


User avatar
HawkeyeGirl

Bronze
Posts: 459
Joined: Sun May 06, 2012 9:13 pm

Re: December 2012 Re-takers

Post by HawkeyeGirl » Tue Nov 06, 2012 12:30 am

mrizza wrote:
Did no one read this? I feel like I'm taking crazy pills
It's in the computer.... Ohhhhh

If I had internet skillz i'd put a gif up. but i don't...

User avatar
Lenahan3

Bronze
Posts: 264
Joined: Fri May 11, 2012 12:57 am

Re: December 2012 Re-takers

Post by Lenahan3 » Tue Nov 06, 2012 12:30 am

Did no one read this? I feel like I'm taking crazy pills
*Ignore button.




Haha.

User avatar
Lenahan3

Bronze
Posts: 264
Joined: Fri May 11, 2012 12:57 am

Re: December 2012 Re-takers

Post by Lenahan3 » Tue Nov 06, 2012 12:31 am

If bitsy comes up with new terms for our bet, so i'm no longer in a tar bet with her... i'll take the bet if tie goes to me. The LSAT has made me so masochistic...

what do you want from me? i came up with your half. alternatively, in case of your loss, instead of a full shave, you could let the chats determine the course of your facial hair. im voting fu manchu.
I want you to carve artful designs and swirls into your beard.

User avatar
Cobretti

Gold
Posts: 2593
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 12:45 am

Re: December 2012 Re-takers

Post by Cobretti » Tue Nov 06, 2012 12:31 am

bitsy wrote:
mrizza wrote: If bitsy comes up with new terms for our bet, so i'm no longer in a tar bet with her... i'll take the bet if tie goes to me. The LSAT has made me so masochistic...
what do you want from me? i came up with your half. alternatively, in case of your loss, instead of a full shave, you could let the chats determine the course of your facial hair. im voting fu manchu.
You have to get a custom made shirt that says "Rizza Beat Me On The LSAT" and wear it to NU ASW.

ETA: Only when we're allowed to dress informally of course.

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


User avatar
HawkeyeGirl

Bronze
Posts: 459
Joined: Sun May 06, 2012 9:13 pm

Re: December 2012 Re-takers

Post by HawkeyeGirl » Tue Nov 06, 2012 12:33 am

mrizza wrote:
bitsy wrote:
mrizza wrote: If bitsy comes up with new terms for our bet, so i'm no longer in a tar bet with her... i'll take the bet if tie goes to me. The LSAT has made me so masochistic...
what do you want from me? i came up with your half. alternatively, in case of your loss, instead of a full shave, you could let the chats determine the course of your facial hair. im voting fu manchu.
You have to get a custom made shirt that says "Rizza Beat Me On The LSAT" and wear it to NU ASW.

ETA: Only when we're allowed to dress informally of course.
But then you look like a nerd for still caring about the LSAT after everyone's admitted. You should make her wear the Biebs shirt instead.

User avatar
99.9luft

Silver
Posts: 1234
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2010 4:32 pm

Re: December 2012 Re-takers

Post by 99.9luft » Tue Nov 06, 2012 12:33 am

mrizza wrote:
bitsy wrote:
mrizza wrote: If bitsy comes up with new terms for our bet, so i'm no longer in a tar bet with her... i'll take the bet if tie goes to me. The LSAT has made me so masochistic...
what do you want from me? i came up with your half. alternatively, in case of your loss, instead of a full shave, you could let the chats determine the course of your facial hair. im voting fu manchu.
You have to get a custom made shirt that says "Rizza Beat Me On The LSAT" and wear it to NU ASW.
haha, i like the way you think, but even sporting a "Top-law-schools.com" t-shirt to ASW is douchy enough...

User avatar
GabeQuixote

Bronze
Posts: 206
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2012 11:26 pm

Re: December 2012 Re-takers

Post by GabeQuixote » Tue Nov 06, 2012 12:35 am

HawkeyeGirl wrote:
mrizza wrote:
bitsy wrote:
mrizza wrote: If bitsy comes up with new terms for our bet, so i'm no longer in a tar bet with her... i'll take the bet if tie goes to me. The LSAT has made me so masochistic...
what do you want from me? i came up with your half. alternatively, in case of your loss, instead of a full shave, you could let the chats determine the course of your facial hair. im voting fu manchu.
You have to get a custom made shirt that says "Rizza Beat Me On The LSAT" and wear it to NU ASW.

ETA: Only when we're allowed to dress informally of course.
But then you look like a nerd for still caring about the LSAT after everyone's admitted. You should make her wear the Biebs shirt instead.
W-w-w-w-wait you mean -- someday I w-w-w-w-w-w-won't care about the LSAT?

*feels weak*

User avatar
Cobretti

Gold
Posts: 2593
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 12:45 am

Re: December 2012 Re-takers

Post by Cobretti » Tue Nov 06, 2012 12:37 am

Ya you guys are right, it might reflect poorly on me...

I like the Biebs shirt idea. Rules are it has to have sparkley shit on it and his face has to take up at least half of the shirt.

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


User avatar
NoodleyOne

Gold
Posts: 2326
Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 7:32 pm

Re: December 2012 Re-takers

Post by NoodleyOne » Tue Nov 06, 2012 12:37 am

Ooooooooo... that's a good idea.

User avatar
HawkeyeGirl

Bronze
Posts: 459
Joined: Sun May 06, 2012 9:13 pm

Re: December 2012 Re-takers

Post by HawkeyeGirl » Tue Nov 06, 2012 12:37 am

Image

IT WORKED!!!!

User avatar
HawkeyeGirl

Bronze
Posts: 459
Joined: Sun May 06, 2012 9:13 pm

Re: December 2012 Re-takers

Post by HawkeyeGirl » Tue Nov 06, 2012 12:39 am

mrizza wrote:Ya you guys are right, it might reflect poorly on me...

I like the Biebs shirt idea. Rules are it has to have sparkley shit on it and his face has to take up at least half of the shirt.
Maybe you should pick it out for her just to make sure it meets the criteria

User avatar
Lenahan3

Bronze
Posts: 264
Joined: Fri May 11, 2012 12:57 am

Re: December 2012 Re-takers

Post by Lenahan3 » Tue Nov 06, 2012 12:42 am

HawkeyeGirl wrote:
mrizza wrote:Ya you guys are right, it might reflect poorly on me...

I like the Biebs shirt idea. Rules are it has to have sparkley shit on it and his face has to take up at least half of the shirt.
Maybe you should pick it out for her just to make sure it meets the criteria
Meh. I think the Biebs thing is/will be a bit dated.

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


User avatar
Cobretti

Gold
Posts: 2593
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 12:45 am

Re: December 2012 Re-takers

Post by Cobretti » Tue Nov 06, 2012 12:44 am

Lenahan3 wrote:
HawkeyeGirl wrote:
mrizza wrote:Ya you guys are right, it might reflect poorly on me...

I like the Biebs shirt idea. Rules are it has to have sparkley shit on it and his face has to take up at least half of the shirt.
Maybe you should pick it out for her just to make sure it meets the criteria
Meh. I think the Biebs thing is/will be a bit dated.
I'm not worried about 14 yr olds thinking she's cool. I'm worried about 0Ls laughing at her.

User avatar
bitsy

Bronze
Posts: 195
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 8:06 pm

Re: December 2012 Re-takers

Post by bitsy » Tue Nov 06, 2012 12:44 am

mrizza wrote:Ya you guys are right, it might reflect poorly on me...

I like the Biebs shirt idea. Rules are it has to have sparkley shit on it and his face has to take up at least half of the shirt.
i will accept these terms, but recent evidence has surfaced that facial hair shame does not have a significant impact on mrizza. anyone have ideas to heighten the bet to bieber-shirt-first-impression-on-fellow-law-students levels?

User avatar
Lenahan3

Bronze
Posts: 264
Joined: Fri May 11, 2012 12:57 am

Re: December 2012 Re-takers

Post by Lenahan3 » Tue Nov 06, 2012 12:46 am

mrizza wrote:
Lenahan3 wrote:
HawkeyeGirl wrote:
mrizza wrote:Ya you guys are right, it might reflect poorly on me...

I like the Biebs shirt idea. Rules are it has to have sparkley shit on it and his face has to take up at least half of the shirt.
Maybe you should pick it out for her just to make sure it meets the criteria
Meh. I think the Biebs thing is/will be a bit dated.
I'm not worried about 14 yr olds thinking she's cool. I'm worried about 0Ls laughing at her.
Duh. Making fun of him thing is a bit dated, but I suppose I'd still laugh pretty hard if I saw that, haha.

User avatar
gguuueessttt

Bronze
Posts: 473
Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2012 5:18 pm

Re: December 2012 Re-takers

Post by gguuueessttt » Tue Nov 06, 2012 12:47 am

bitsy wrote:
mrizza wrote:Ya you guys are right, it might reflect poorly on me...

I like the Biebs shirt idea. Rules are it has to have sparkley shit on it and his face has to take up at least half of the shirt.
i will accept these terms, but recent evidence has surfaced that facial hair shame does not have a significant impact on mrizza. anyone have ideas to heighten the bet to bieber-shirt-first-impression-on-fellow-law-students levels?

he should get a hairdo like this bad boy on the first day of classes.

Image

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”