Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=195377
No. But you "can" do that while you start the next section of the test...but do it quickly!NewYorkL wrote:Possible?
Suppose I finish a question exactly when they say time is up and put your pencils down. Will I have at any part of the test be able to fill in questions I skipped?
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/cheatboblawlob wrote:No. But you "can" do that while you start the next section of the test...but do it quickly!NewYorkL wrote:Possible?
Suppose I finish a question exactly when they say time is up and put your pencils down. Will I have at any part of the test be able to fill in questions I skipped?
I do not know if you're aware that it is against the rules. OP presumably wants to become some big shot lawyer, perhaps s/he should start practicing being ethical now.msmith19 wrote:I don't see why you couldn't remember what you were gonna do and then do it while you're writing the next section? Some kind of logistics that limits this possibility?
How do you equate breaking rules with being unethical? I'm not going to risk it personally. But it would be near impossible in a large room to see whether a person fills in a tiny box 1/2 an inch from where they should be filling it in.mvpforme wrote:I do not know if you're aware that it is against the rules. OP presumably wants to become some big shot lawyer, perhaps s/he should start practicing being ethical now.msmith19 wrote:I don't see why you couldn't remember what you were gonna do and then do it while you're writing the next section? Some kind of logistics that limits this possibility?
msmith19 wrote:How do you equate breaking rules with being unethical? I'm not going to risk it personally. But it would be near impossible in a large room to see whether a person fills in a tiny box 1/2 an inch from where they should be filling it in.
don't you know? they have like 50 of those dome cameras in every testing center. They have eyes on every. single. person. EVERYONEmsmith19 wrote:How do you equate breaking rules with being unethical? I'm not going to risk it personally. But it would be near impossible in a large room to see whether a person fills in a tiny box 1/2 an inch from where they should be filling it in.mvpforme wrote:I do not know if you're aware that it is against the rules. OP presumably wants to become some big shot lawyer, perhaps s/he should start practicing being ethical now.msmith19 wrote:I don't see why you couldn't remember what you were gonna do and then do it while you're writing the next section? Some kind of logistics that limits this possibility?
Concerning to think that to-be lawyers can't discern ethics from the law or even more, from non-legal 'rules.'North wrote:msmith19 wrote:How do you equate breaking rules with being unethical? I'm not going to risk it personally. But it would be near impossible in a large room to see whether a person fills in a tiny box 1/2 an inch from where they should be filling it in.
Is your question rhetorical? If so, I really hope you don't become a lawyer since you obviously have no regard for common ethics, or it could be that you have no understanding of it. Either way, don't become a lawyer.msmith19 wrote:How do you equate breaking rules with being unethical? I'm not going to risk it personally. But it would be near impossible in a large room to see whether a person fills in a tiny box 1/2 an inch from where they should be filling it in.mvpforme wrote:I do not know if you're aware that it is against the rules. OP presumably wants to become some big shot lawyer, perhaps s/he should start practicing being ethical now.msmith19 wrote:I don't see why you couldn't remember what you were gonna do and then do it while you're writing the next section? Some kind of logistics that limits this possibility?
By the way, I would love to see you leave 2-3 ACs empty and see your score go out the window than taking the minuscule risk of getting caught (be it filling it in next section or 1 second after the proctor says time up).
Note: I am in no way condoning or declaring that I will partake in this type of behaviour.
msmith19 wrote:Concerning to think that to-be lawyers can't discern ethics from the law or even more, from non-legal 'rules.'
Clearly you haven't read the admission ticket. It says nothing about not bubbling after the time is up or about breaking the rules of the LSAT. In a similar vein, you're on your way to becoming a fantastically terrible lawyer.North wrote:msmith19 wrote:Concerning to think that to-be lawyers can't discern ethics from the law or even more, from non-legal 'rules.'
You are on your way to becoming a fantastically sleazy lawyer, holmes.
msmith19 wrote:Clearly you haven't read the admission ticket. It says nothing about not bubbling after the time is up or about breaking the rules of the LSAT. In a similar vein, you're on your way to becoming a fantastically terrible lawyer.
Seriously?msmith19 wrote:How do you equate breaking rules with being unethical? I'm not going to risk it personally. But it would be near impossible in a large room to see whether a person fills in a tiny box 1/2 an inch from where they should be filling it in.
nygrrrl wrote:Seriously?msmith19 wrote:How do you equate breaking rules with being unethical? I'm not going to risk it personally. But it would be near impossible in a large room to see whether a person fills in a tiny box 1/2 an inch from where they should be filling it in.
Wow.
IIRC, this happened on someone on TLS, they had an asterisk on their LSAT score, and their admissions cycle was fucked.dingbat wrote:I hope whoever thinks it's ok tries it and gets busted