PT 55 Forum

[LionelHutzJD]

SHEESH. That was really annoying. I did not do well at all. Does anybody else feel like the LR was more difficult than usual?? Also, with the RC, i walked away feeling like i did really well but once again got sunk hardcore.

[CyanIdes Of March]

Don't scare me like that. PT 55 the next one I'm taking on Tuesday. I took PT 54 today and scored pretty well though.

[LionelHutzJD]

I mean im not the highest scorer to begin with but shit RC got a lot more tricky. and you need to read much closer on LR than with the older PT

[skri65]

The opposite for me. I scored -5 on both LR and RC combined and then popped a -8 on the LG. The shuttle game messed with me.

[nick_scheu]

I took this one yesterday. I received a 173 on PT54, but a 167 on PT55. I definitely felt like I was more "in the zone" for 54 (54 was Saturday, 55 on Sunday--I was just tired for 55, honestly), but I do think I did worse... I was probably an actual 169 or 170 on PT55, if one could control for "in the zone-ness" and fatigue.

I got -0 on RC, -3/-4 on LR, and -5 on LG (didn't finish the last few). The LR made the difference for me... There were just a lot of really tricky questions. LG was consistent with other recent PTs I've taken (though I had a -2 on 54, IIRC), though I did struggle with the shuttles.

Oh, and this was my 16th preptest in the past 3 weeks. I started at 162, and I'm probably at about 169 among my most recent tests (highest was the 173, plus two 170s).

[CyanIdes Of March]

Heh, 173 is what I scored on PT 54 as well. Scored a 167 on PT 52 but I want to chalk that up to it being my first 5 section PT + new (more test-like) environment.

EDIT: Took 3/4ths of it... place I was taking it at was incredibly too loud (I didn't think libraries had so many inconsiderate people but learned something new). The RC was killer though as is the curve, I did the worst I've done on an RC section in a very long time with a -7.