Page 1 of 1
Are LR sections in the later PTs harder than earlier PTs?
Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 12:41 pm
by WanderingPondering
If so, what is the difference? I've been hitting more snags early in the LR section than I did before. Can't really figure out what is the difference. More assumption questions in more recent tests?
Re: Are LR sections in the later PTs harder than earlier PTs?
Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 1:54 pm
by kaseyb002
I think they are in a certain way. With the later ones, I have to read much more carefully and slowly (make sure you soak up everything). While the earlier ones the reading is a little more like RC (just get the overall reasoning and pick up whatever details you can).
That being said, I prefer the newer ones to the old ones. Sometimes the old ones would just throw some real curve balls. But that's just me.
Re: Are LR sections in the later PTs harder than earlier PTs?
Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 2:04 pm
by suzige
For me, the later PTs, especially the 60s, seem to have a more vague way of wording the actual question. I think that is what slows me down a bit.