Retake after a 170? Forum
- gable sans stache
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2012 4:49 pm
Retake after a 170?
Applied last year and decided to take a couple years off for financial reasons and to build a real-world resume. Going for fall of '14 now. I figure with a little bit of free time I can improve on a 170 - mostly in LG. Anyone have any experience or advice on prep materials?
-
- Posts: 444
- Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2012 10:47 am
Re: Retake after a 170?
Yea, why not? Higher scores turn into more $$ and/or acceptances. If you have the time, go for it.
LG and LR Bibiles are a good place to start, as I'm sure you know
LG and LR Bibiles are a good place to start, as I'm sure you know
- NoodleyOne
- Posts: 2326
- Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 7:32 pm
Re: Retake after a 170?
I know someone on here is retaking a 172, and I am retaking a 169 (and would have retaken a 170 without a second thought). Every point on thus thing helps.
- shifty_eyed
- Posts: 1925
- Joined: Fri Oct 02, 2009 8:09 pm
Re: Retake after a 170?
I retook a 170 and got... a 170.
But there is NO HARM in retaking at all, and since you have the time, WHY NOT?
But there is NO HARM in retaking at all, and since you have the time, WHY NOT?
-
- Posts: 110
- Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2012 12:45 pm
Re: Retake after a 170?
While I certainly agree that if OP can beat 170, they should absolutely re-take as every point is critical. It's my understanding however that there is at least moderate risk. If OP scores 166, that doesn't look good, right?shifty_eyed wrote:I retook a 170 and got... a 170.
But there is NO HARM in retaking at all, and since you have the time, WHY NOT?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 45
- Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2012 10:27 am
Re: Retake after a 170?
.
Last edited by LargeNinCharge on Thu Nov 29, 2012 3:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Funkycrime
- Posts: 142
- Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2011 4:31 pm
Re: Retake after a 170?
It doesn't look good I guess, but it isn't bad either. Schools are too big of median whores to seriously care about a lower score, not matter the order it comes in.JDeezy wrote:While I certainly agree that if OP can beat 170, they should absolutely re-take as every point is critical. It's my understanding however that there is at least moderate risk. If OP scores 166, that doesn't look good, right?shifty_eyed wrote:I retook a 170 and got... a 170.
But there is NO HARM in retaking at all, and since you have the time, WHY NOT?
- R86
- Posts: 460
- Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2012 8:03 pm
Re: Retake after a 170?
I say go for it, but only if you're willing to dedicate some time to figuring out where your mistakes came from and how not to make them again.
I hit 170 my first take, and was dead set on retaking, but realized after a while that 170 is a good enough score for the schools I really want to be at and I just couldn't find any motivation to study for a retake. I have another chance to take the test for free still (LSAC waiver), so if my cycle doesn't turn out this time around, I'll probably end up retaking after all.
To bring some objective facts to the table, the most recent available data shows that out of the 90 people who retook a 170, 50 scored higher while 40 stayed at 170 or scored lower. So the odds are ever so slightly in your favor, I guess.
I hit 170 my first take, and was dead set on retaking, but realized after a while that 170 is a good enough score for the schools I really want to be at and I just couldn't find any motivation to study for a retake. I have another chance to take the test for free still (LSAC waiver), so if my cycle doesn't turn out this time around, I'll probably end up retaking after all.
To bring some objective facts to the table, the most recent available data shows that out of the 90 people who retook a 170, 50 scored higher while 40 stayed at 170 or scored lower. So the odds are ever so slightly in your favor, I guess.
- Sounder89
- Posts: 81
- Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 2:32 pm
Re: Retake after a 170?
A downward trend certainly wouldn't help though. A 170 and a 166 a year later could definitely raise red flags with some adcoms, so it is a little risky. Not to mention all those hours you would have to pour into another round of LSAT prep. Since OP seems to have the time however, I would say go for it. Plus, it seems to be a general consensus around here that LG is the easiest section to improve on, so aiming for a score in the mid 170s wouldn't be unrealistic.Funkycrime wrote:It doesn't look good I guess, but it isn't bad either. Schools are too big of median whores to seriously care about a lower score, not matter the order it comes in.JDeezy wrote:While I certainly agree that if OP can beat 170, they should absolutely re-take as every point is critical. It's my understanding however that there is at least moderate risk. If OP scores 166, that doesn't look good, right?shifty_eyed wrote:I retook a 170 and got... a 170.
But there is NO HARM in retaking at all, and since you have the time, WHY NOT?
- gable sans stache
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2012 4:49 pm
Re: Retake after a 170?
Thanks for the insight, guys.
I studied with the Kaplan method - would switching to Powerscore or something else to improve on LG help or hinder? I've never really learned anything else, so I'm not sure if the methods complement each other or not.
That's interesting - I didn't know you could even look that up.To bring some objective facts to the table, the most recent available data shows that out of the 90 people who retook a 170, 50 scored higher while 40 stayed at 170 or scored lower. So the odds are ever so slightly in your favor, I guess.
I studied with the Kaplan method - would switching to Powerscore or something else to improve on LG help or hinder? I've never really learned anything else, so I'm not sure if the methods complement each other or not.
- nygrrrl
- Posts: 4434
- Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 1:01 am
Re: Retake after a 170?
I started out with Kaplan, then found Powerscore. In my case, the LG Bible was tremendously helpful; I credit it with boosting my score. Best of luck!gable sans stache wrote:Thanks for the insight, guys.
That's interesting - I didn't know you could even look that up.To bring some objective facts to the table, the most recent available data shows that out of the 90 people who retook a 170, 50 scored higher while 40 stayed at 170 or scored lower. So the odds are ever so slightly in your favor, I guess.
I studied with the Kaplan method - would switching to Powerscore or something else to improve on LG help or hinder? I've never really learned anything else, so I'm not sure if the methods complement each other or not.
- NoodleyOne
- Posts: 2326
- Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 7:32 pm
Re: Retake after a 170?
LG Bible and/or Manhattan LG are the credited responses to that question. Kaplan method can die in a fire.
- CyanIdes Of March
- Posts: 700
- Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2012 1:57 pm
Re: Retake after a 170?
If I got a 170 I'd most likely retake. I'd probably retake anything under a 172 - 173.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- cloudhidden
- Posts: 193
- Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2011 9:29 am
Re: Retake after a 170?
That's about how I feel. Two points isn't even a statistically meaningful difference but ask anyone on here about what it means for admissions and scholarship, especially with CLS at 172 median for another year.CyanIdes Of March wrote:If I got a 170 I'd most likely retake. I'd probably retake anything under a 172 - 173.
- VUSisterRayVU
- Posts: 162
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2012 2:57 pm
Re: Retake after a 170?
I'd argue that if you score within 2 points of your PT avg and you aren't shut out of your second choices in the T14, retaking might not be the best move simply because you almost certainly scored in your range. The time and effort and delay are likely best spent elsewhere. But if you were testing consistently in the low 170s and got a 169, I would retake because the difference between a 169 and a 17x is substantial imo. A 172 when you PT at 174 seems foolish to do over unless you got shut out of HYS bc of it and hate Columbia or whatever.
- banjo
- Posts: 1351
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2011 8:00 pm
Re: Retake after a 170?
I would not retake a 170 unless I had an HYS-level GPA (3.8+ or 3.7 with extraordinary softs). Obviously, if you were PTing way above 170, that's a different story.
As for prep, I think we need more info about your score breakdown and your earlier approach.
As for prep, I think we need more info about your score breakdown and your earlier approach.
- abcde12345
- Posts: 255
- Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2012 8:41 pm
Re: Retake after a 170?
There is absolutely no question that you should retake; not because a 170 is bad at all (it's a great score), but because you have a whole year (or 7 months if you're taking it in June). What I would've done for a whole year!
Additionally, you say your problem is with LG, which is the most learnable section because there are really only 3 templates that the test-makers use: linear, advanced linear, and grouping (I don't include pure sequencing because it's so easy; I don't want to give it the credit of being amongst the rest). So although there are infinite possibilities for game solutions, there are limited possibilities for game rules, which you can easily learn.
Additionally, you say your problem is with LG, which is the most learnable section because there are really only 3 templates that the test-makers use: linear, advanced linear, and grouping (I don't include pure sequencing because it's so easy; I don't want to give it the credit of being amongst the rest). So although there are infinite possibilities for game solutions, there are limited possibilities for game rules, which you can easily learn.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- NoodleyOne
- Posts: 2326
- Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 7:32 pm
Re: Retake after a 170?
There are plenty reasons to retake a 170 as a splitter. 172 and up can open a lot of doors both school wise and scholly wise.banjo wrote:I would not retake a 170 unless I had an HYS-level GPA (3.8+ or 3.7 with extraordinary softs). Obviously, if you were PTing way above 170, that's a different story.
As for prep, I think we need more info about your score breakdown and your earlier approach.
-
- Posts: 1947
- Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 2:55 am
Re: Retake after a 170?
Outside of YLS and SLS, it would have practically no effect, especially in the current admissions climate. Law schools are going to be especially desperate to maintain medians over at least the next couple of years, as high scorers become fewer in number. The 170 is all they would see.Sounder89 wrote: A downward trend certainly wouldn't help though. A 170 and a 166 a year later could definitely raise red flags with some adcoms, so it is a little risky.
OP, you should definitely retake. Regardless of your GPA, even improving to a 172 will put you in a considerably stronger position. Since you have the time to study, since you managed to get to a 170 even with Kaplan's garbage methods, and because LG is apparently your biggest issue, your chances of improving your score seem pretty favorable.
- gable sans stache
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2012 4:49 pm
Re: Retake after a 170?
Thanks for the feedback. I'm actually kind of happy to hear bad things about Kaplan's method - Powerscore it is.
As for my situation (if anyone's as bored at work as I am), it's weird. I have a ~3.6 GPA (that was a 2.9 my first year, then a transfer and 3.9 my next three years). Great softs and work experience, but I got into the wrong crowd that freshman year and starred in a string of arrests (weed, alcohol) - random dings by a couple schools like Ohio State can only be attributed to that, I think.
Biglaw's not my thing, so I'm shooting for a T14 LRAP if the tides are right. If not, I'd be happy taking help from a mid T1 school on the West Coast and working public interest or settling down at a midsize firm.
I'm not really stressing about which hump a few points would propel me over - I just have time to kill, and if my PT scores increase (they were ~170), why not?
As for my situation (if anyone's as bored at work as I am), it's weird. I have a ~3.6 GPA (that was a 2.9 my first year, then a transfer and 3.9 my next three years). Great softs and work experience, but I got into the wrong crowd that freshman year and starred in a string of arrests (weed, alcohol) - random dings by a couple schools like Ohio State can only be attributed to that, I think.
Biglaw's not my thing, so I'm shooting for a T14 LRAP if the tides are right. If not, I'd be happy taking help from a mid T1 school on the West Coast and working public interest or settling down at a midsize firm.
I'm not really stressing about which hump a few points would propel me over - I just have time to kill, and if my PT scores increase (they were ~170), why not?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login