Manhattan LSAT Logic Games Guide P. 92 (+General Question)
Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2012 10:56 pm
Hey all ... I'm working through the Manhattan LSAT Guide right now and on p. 92 #3 a rule expressly states:
"The flight that departs first is not bound for Japan"
Since (rule 1) No flight bound for Germany can depart until at least one flight bound for Japan has departed,
Isn't the only remaining option for slot 1 out of F,G, and J going to be F?
In the answer key it indicates with a J/F in slot 1 that J can go there, but as I just cited in rule 4, the first flight is NOT bound for Japan. Am I confused here, or this a misprint?
Edit:
And because I don't want to flood LSAT Prep, I want to ask: why the hell am I having such trouble with the 3D Numbered Ordering Games in Manhattan LSAT? I haven't had this much trouble in a long time with "Advanced Linear" games
Edit2: Is the game on p 109 supposed to be insanely hard? This is one of those times that LSAT studying has driven me crazy, I literally have no idea how to approach this. The game appears to be based mainly on deductions that I will never be able to make ... gah. For example, the explanations say "if exactly two suspects confess after T, well then W must come after T, right?" How would I know this? The only rule relating to W says that no suspects confessed after W was questioned, and they make sure to mention this doesn't imply W confessed. There is nothing to indicate there's a certain lower thresholds of confessions that must occur, so why would I think that W must come after T?
"The flight that departs first is not bound for Japan"
Since (rule 1) No flight bound for Germany can depart until at least one flight bound for Japan has departed,
Isn't the only remaining option for slot 1 out of F,G, and J going to be F?
In the answer key it indicates with a J/F in slot 1 that J can go there, but as I just cited in rule 4, the first flight is NOT bound for Japan. Am I confused here, or this a misprint?
Edit:
And because I don't want to flood LSAT Prep, I want to ask: why the hell am I having such trouble with the 3D Numbered Ordering Games in Manhattan LSAT? I haven't had this much trouble in a long time with "Advanced Linear" games
Edit2: Is the game on p 109 supposed to be insanely hard? This is one of those times that LSAT studying has driven me crazy, I literally have no idea how to approach this. The game appears to be based mainly on deductions that I will never be able to make ... gah. For example, the explanations say "if exactly two suspects confess after T, well then W must come after T, right?" How would I know this? The only rule relating to W says that no suspects confessed after W was questioned, and they make sure to mention this doesn't imply W confessed. There is nothing to indicate there's a certain lower thresholds of confessions that must occur, so why would I think that W must come after T?