Page 1 of 1
LSAT Logic 101
Posted: Sun Jun 24, 2012 11:37 pm
by 03152016
.
Re: LSAT Logic 101
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2012 1:24 am
by Clearly
I suppose you don't want nitpicking right?
Re: LSAT Logic 101
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2012 1:32 am
by 03152016
.
Re: LSAT Logic 101
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2012 1:44 am
by Clearly
Max324 wrote:Clearlynotstefan wrote:I suppose you don't want nitpicking right?
Fire away. Wrote part of this drunk, I'm editing out mistakes as I go along.
I'll PM you so I don't muddy up this thread and ruin your sticky chances lol
Re: LSAT Logic 101
Posted: Sun Dec 28, 2014 3:22 pm
by adamerica1291
Thanks for writing this. It's highly accessible and helpful. Within the guide you referred to the material as being used in the analytical reasoning section. How similar/different are the logical reasoning sections? Would you write another guide that covers them? Thanks.
Re: LSAT Logic 101
Posted: Sun Dec 28, 2014 3:26 pm
by I<3ScholarlySweets!
O! SUCH INSIGHT!
Re: LSAT Logic 101
Posted: Sun Dec 28, 2014 3:28 pm
by flawyers
^ ban this fool already.
Re: LSAT Logic 101
Posted: Sun Dec 28, 2014 5:49 pm
by 03152016
adamerica1291 wrote:Thanks for writing this. It's highly accessible and helpful. Within the guide you referred to the material as being used in the analytical reasoning section. How similar/different are the logical reasoning sections? Would you write another guide that covers them? Thanks.
you bumped a pretty old thread
appreciate the positive feedback
i don't make posts like this anymore though, for LR help you should ask around on the main board
fwiw, i used the powerscore LRB, and it worked well for me
I<3ScholarlySweets! wrote:O! SUCH INSIGHT!
what a meaningful criticism
with posts like these, i can tell you're very smart
Re: LSAT Logic 101
Posted: Mon Dec 29, 2014 2:29 am
by Clearly
Wait do you remember what my antique critique was? I vaguely remember wanting to contribute to this.
Re: LSAT Logic 101
Posted: Mon Dec 29, 2014 2:57 am
by PeanutsNJam
I<3ScholarlySweets! wrote:O! SUCH INSIGHT!
Don't you try to do literally the exact same thing with your daily scholarly tips. except Brut is a 179 IIRC what's your score. Although IMO this is all info you can get in a powerscore bible or some other prep book.
Re: LSAT Logic 101
Posted: Mon Dec 29, 2014 3:27 am
by 03152016
Clearly wrote:Wait do you remember what my antique critique was? I vaguely remember wanting to contribute to this.
i said conditionals have two statements, you argued that compound conditionals (and/or) have more than two
in retrospect, i shouldn't have said "statements" at all, framing it that way is confusing to students
i should have said "conditions", which, aside from being more precise, would have cleared up that ambiguity
man, it's only been two and a half years but it seems like ancient history
Re: LSAT Logic 101
Posted: Mon Dec 29, 2014 2:43 pm
by MattM
How long did it take for you to get out of low 170's to high 170's and that awesome 179?
I'm in 168-171 range but trying to get into at least a 173 on test day
Re: LSAT Logic 101
Posted: Mon Dec 29, 2014 6:45 pm
by Clearly
MattM wrote:How long did it take for you to get out of low 170's to high 170's and that awesome 179?
I'm in 168-171 range but trying to get into at least a 173 on test day
Strictly timed?