Top Law Schools

Has anyone ever tried to score a 120 on purpose after they were already accepted to the school of their choice? I think it'd be pretty cool to attempt it because it's probably just as hard to score a 120 as it is to get a 160 or so because there's a slight chance you can accidentally get a question right on a confusing question.


Anyone else thinking about trying it out? Maybe with your 2nd or 3rd take?

You are hilariously stupid.

120

Not hilarious, but endearing IMO

retarded, why would any person want to waste 150 bucks to do that?

Enjoy explaining that in an addendum.

--ImageRemoved--

Crowing wrote:[img]fuckyounatalie[/img]

Perfect

Most Recent LSAC Repeater Data

At least 26 people who had scored a 120 retook the LSAT in 2010-2011.

5 of them, mind you, managed to score another fucking 120.

DaRascal wrote:Has anyone ever tried to score a 120 on purpose after they were already accepted to the school of their choice? I think it'd be pretty cool to attempt it because it's probably just as hard to score a 120 as it is to get a 160 or so because there's a slight chance you can accidentally get a question right on a confusing question.


Anyone else thinking about trying it out? Maybe with your 2nd or 3rd take?

144

Do you think anyone's had a 180 and a 120?
If not, I think that guy who got 3 180s should do it. He'd become known as Mr. LSAT.

R86 wrote:Most Recent LSAC Repeater Data

At least 26 people who had scored a 120 retook the LSAT in 2010-2011.

5 of them, mind you, managed to score another fucking 120.

The anti Dave Hall.

R86 wrote:Most Recent LSAC Repeater Data

At least 26 people who had scored a 120 retook the LSAT in 2010-2011.

5 of them, mind you, managed to score another fucking 120.

That's triumphant.

My theory is close to being empirically verified: every third thought that pops into your head gets its own thread.

R86 wrote:Most Recent LSAC Repeater Data

At least 26 people who had scored a 120 retook the LSAT in 2010-2011.

5 of them, mind you, managed to score another fucking 120.

Leave me alone all of those words in sentences are confusing.

I scored three 120s, though the bastards at LSAC haven't "officially" released the last one because I admitted I was just doing it for the lulz.

DaRascal wrote:Do you think anyone's had a 180 and a 120?
If not, I think that guy who got 3 180s should do it. He'd become known as Mr. LSAT.

Dave Hall is only one 180 and a 120 away. I think he can do it.

R86 wrote:Most Recent LSAC Repeater Data

At least 26 people who had scored a 120 retook the LSAT in 2010-2011.

5 of them, mind you, managed to score another fucking 120.

Whoa. I don't even know what to say.

Before I opened this thread I told myself that it was going to be authored by rascal...why did I even bother opening it???

shifty_eyed wrote:Not hilarious, but endearing IMO

My TLS experience has improved since darascal started creating threads. It was a sad couple days when he got banned.

man_utd_4l wrote:Before I opened this thread I told myself that it was going to be authored by rascal...why did I even bother opening it???

for the lulz?

guinness1547 wrote:

R86 wrote:Most Recent LSAC Repeater Data

At least 26 people who had scored a 120 retook the LSAT in 2010-2011.

5 of them, mind you, managed to score another fucking 120.

Whoa. I don't even know what to say.

I know.

I also wonder about the 174 scorer who retook and dropped to the 150's..

R86 wrote:

guinness1547 wrote:

R86 wrote:Most Recent LSAC Repeater Data

At least 26 people who had scored a 120 retook the LSAT in 2010-2011.

5 of them, mind you, managed to score another fucking 120.

Whoa. I don't even know what to say.

I know.

I also wonder about the 174 scorer who retook and dropped to the 150's..

I wonder if they ran out of time on a game or something and then knew that they couldn't pull it back. I wouldn't bother trying if I knew I had already sunk myself. Could also be a bubbling error.

R86 wrote:

guinness1547 wrote:

R86 wrote:Most Recent LSAC Repeater Data

At least 26 people who had scored a 120 retook the LSAT in 2010-2011.

5 of them, mind you, managed to score another fucking 120.

Whoa. I don't even know what to say.

I know.

I also wonder about the 174 scorer who retook and dropped to the 150's..

he probably encountered unexpected scratch space on one of his logic games

R86 wrote:Most Recent LSAC Repeater Data

At least 26 people who had scored a 120 retook the LSAT in 2010-2011.

5 of them, mind you, managed to score another fucking 120.

I really cannot understand this. The raw score necessary to get a 120 is around 15. Randomly guessing one letter pockets someone, at least, around 19 or 20 raw points.

I don't believe that someone (of college level) can be so cognitively impaired such that his score, after genuinely attempting to do well, is lower than it would be had he guessed all one letter throughout the exam.

Those people that scored a 120, I think, did so on purpose.