Top Law Schools

Just got done with my test and would like to figure out what my experimental section was. If you took the June 2012 test in Europe what was your section order?

Just curious, did you have the two page per game LG format too?

Yup. I did a double take haha.

I had two LG's. The first one (which was first) was mostly groups. The second one (which came 3rd) was all linear. I spoke with one person after the test whose experimental was a RC. By speaking with him I was able to ascertain that my experimental was the LG with the linear questions (unfortunately, because this one was far easier than the one with all the groups!).

How did you find the test overall?

where did you take it? i took it in london. section order was: rc lg lr rc lg. how did it go for you?

I tested in London as well. Overall I felt like it was about average maybe a little on the difficult side, but I am also really awful at judging test difficulty levels so who knows. Dudeinator do you happen to remember if the game about the emperor and his edicts was in your 1st or 3rd section? I am pretty sure my 2nd lg section was experimental as well, it seemed way too easy.

I don't remember the emperor and his edicts at all so, assuming we had the same test (and assuming I haven't simply forgotten!) that must have been your experimental.

Yup sounds right. How did you feel about the test? Hard? Easy? Maybe it was just because it was my last section and I was tired, but I thought that the RC was pretty nasty.

I thought the RC was nasty as well. Completely bogged down on the third one. Terrible. Both AR's felt average but I found the RC and LG difficult. Of course it's hard to tell if it was more difficult than average or just the pressure of being under those nasty flourescent lights on game day! But after scoring 164-170 on my most recent timed practice tests, today felt like a big disappointment.

Hey guys I'm in this as well--I had the format that someone mentioned above: rc lg lr rc lr. To the other person that had two RC sections: can we try to figure out which one was the Exp. section?

As for the emperor's edicts that was for sure experimental because I did not have that game.

I don't think I got a 180, but I don't think I completely underperformed either.

laura2011 wrote:where did you take it? i took it in london. section order was: rc lg lr rc lg. how did it go for you?

Wait you mean RC LG LR RC LR, right?

I have been pretty consistently PTing 172-174 but honestly I would be happy with a 170 after today. Really felt like I made a lot of dumb errors. Could also just be over analyzing though. Gotta wait and see I suppose. Any predictions for the curve? I bet -11 for a 170.

TexasAggie13 wrote:I have been pretty consistently PTing 172-174 but honestly I would be happy with a 170 after today. Really felt like I made a lot of dumb errors. Could also just be over analyzing though. Gotta wait and see I suppose. Any predictions for the curve? I bet -11 for a 170.

Man I would be really happy with a 174 at this point, despite my testing around 177+/- for the weeks leading up to the test. Something was weird about the RC... god I can't shake this nervous, nervous feeling that I completely bombed one of those RCs and that one is the real section. I finished the first one in something like 25 minutes, which is not supposed to happen, and then the second one kinda fucked me up from the start and I even ended up having to fix a massive misbubbling... ohhhhhh god.

So I guess I should ask this, but I am afraid to... did anyone else have an RC section about the two African authors? Was that real??? If so, I might cry.

Anyway... Berkeley was my dream but UT is starting to look good again, haha

I had only one RC and yes the African Authors was in there. Sorry.

African authors was real sorry man :/


Are you from TX? Just curious, I am thinking pretty hard about UT as well

outlookingin wrote:

TexasAggie13 wrote:I have been pretty consistently PTing 172-174 but honestly I would be happy with a 170 after today. Really felt like I made a lot of dumb errors. Could also just be over analyzing though. Gotta wait and see I suppose. Any predictions for the curve? I bet -11 for a 170.

Man I would be really happy with a 174 at this point, despite my testing around 177+/- for the weeks leading up to the test. Something was weird about the RC... god I can't shake this nervous, nervous feeling that I completely bombed one of those RCs and that one is the real section. I finished the first one in something like 25 minutes, which is not supposed to happen, and then the second one kinda fucked me up from the start and I even ended up having to fix a massive misbubbling... ohhhhhh god.

So I guess I should ask this, but I am afraid to... did anyone else have an RC section about the two African authors? Was that real??? If so, I might cry.

It was real, sorry . Was my only RC

Does anyone with two LGs know which was exp. There was one LG with a question with 3 quarters (the easy one) (my second) and there was the first LG that started out straightforward but was just pure evil. I really hope that was vague enough, but also made sense

LG-LR-LG-LR-RC

Hi, for those who took the Europe LSAT, do you think RC is difficult? Above average? Close to PT65? Or way easier than PT65?

Thanks from someone who's going to take the Asia LSAT on the 24th

Tonton, unfortunately the real LG was the first one. The second one, with all of those easy linear questions....that was the exp. Much to my chagrin!

Random aside:

For those of you who took it in London, England - I have a few questions (I'm writing the October LSAT in London, England):

1) Where did you write?
2) How did you find the location?
3) Were there a lot of people or was it a smaller group?
4) Was it difficult to find the place/room?

Dudeinator wrote:Tonton, unfortunately the real LG was the first one. The second one, with all of those easy linear questions....that was the exp. Much to my chagrin!

*sigh*