Top Law Schools

Posted: **Mon Jun 11, 2012 11:13 pm**

Deleted

Posted: **Mon Jun 11, 2012 11:19 pm**

Do you remember the number of questions each of your LR sections had?

Posted: **Mon Jun 11, 2012 11:20 pm**

I thought that the first LR was experimental. My timing was all over the place. But maybe I'm just being optimistic...

Posted: **Mon Jun 11, 2012 11:21 pm**

Deleted

Posted: **Mon Jun 11, 2012 11:21 pm**

27-25-25-23-26

i really hope the last lr was exp I blacked out and had 7 left with 5 minutes remaining. Timing was off. The proctors didnt even give us time to flip the paper to start the next section.

Posted: **Mon Jun 11, 2012 11:23 pm**

I agree after number 12 the 5th LR section felt off but everyone else had 252626 when they had a exp LR section so it looks like we are wrong.

Posted: **Mon Jun 11, 2012 11:24 pm**

I have no guess, and don't remember which was really easier.

Posted: **Mon Jun 11, 2012 11:25 pm**

I also had RC-LR-LR-LG-LR

There were multiple experimental LR sections, but I'm pretty sure my experimental was section 3. A question about red pandas was the final question of that section.

Posted: **Mon Jun 11, 2012 11:27 pm**

I thought the 2nd LR was experimental... Did anyone notice like two questions that were plain abnormal? I don't think ive ever seen those question types in my prep...

Posted: **Mon Jun 11, 2012 11:29 pm**

Deleted

Posted: **Mon Jun 11, 2012 11:30 pm**

What the heck is this red panda

Posted: **Mon Jun 11, 2012 11:31 pm**

Shasha Dew Dew wrote:Hey all - I have been reading the post and am interested in others comments.

Those with RC-LR-LR-LG-LR
Which do you think was experimental.

I felt pretty sure Section 5 LR was the experimental- as weird as it might seem.
I felt great in Sections 1-3, Section 4 LG was a little bumpy - but then Section 5 LR halfway through became odd.

What are you thoughts?? If you agree or don't agree with me, please give me your reasoning,
it will help me 'wind down' and get the test out of my system.

Thanks!!!

I just had one LR , so I can sure you the real LR is that one about fingerprint, African American writer, digital publishing

Posted: **Mon Jun 11, 2012 11:32 pm**

Br3v wrote:What the heck is this red panda

Posted: **Mon Jun 11, 2012 11:35 pm**

Posted: **Mon Jun 11, 2012 11:35 pm**

jing87 wrote:
Shasha Dew Dew wrote:Hey all - I have been reading the post and am interested in others comments.

Those with RC-LR-LR-LG-LR
Which do you think was experimental.

I felt pretty sure Section 5 LR was the experimental- as weird as it might seem.
I felt great in Sections 1-3, Section 4 LG was a little bumpy - but then Section 5 LR halfway through became odd.

What are you thoughts?? If you agree or don't agree with me, please give me your reasoning,
it will help me 'wind down' and get the test out of my system.

Thanks!!!
I just had one LR , so I can sure you the real LR is that one about fingerprint, African American writer, digital publishing

That would be a Reading Comp section. Every LSAT has 2 LRs. SOGETTHEFUCKOUTTAHERE

Posted: **Mon Jun 11, 2012 11:36 pm**

Deleted

Posted: **Mon Jun 11, 2012 11:39 pm**

Shasha Dew Dew wrote:Yes, I remember they were

RC - LR 26 - LR 25- LG - LR 26

Mine was
LR (don't remember) - LR 26 (I think) - RC 27 - LR 26 - LG 23.

Which section on your LR do you think was experimental? I think mine was the first one.

Posted: **Mon Jun 11, 2012 11:42 pm**

Deleted

Posted: **Mon Jun 11, 2012 11:42 pm**

I just... I just wish the 5th LR was experimental.

Posted: **Mon Jun 11, 2012 11:43 pm**

darkgrayclouds wrote:I also had RC-LR-LR-LG-LR

There were multiple experimental LR sections, but I'm pretty sure my experimental was section 3. A question about red pandas was the final question of that section.

Can you please post how many questions you had in each section??? Thanks!

Posted: **Mon Jun 11, 2012 11:44 pm**

UtilityMonster wrote:I just... I just wish the 5th LR was experimental.

+1

Posted: **Mon Jun 11, 2012 11:44 pm**

max55 wrote:
darkgrayclouds wrote:I also had RC-LR-LR-LG-LR

There were multiple experimental LR sections, but I'm pretty sure my experimental was section 3. A question about red pandas was the final question of that section.
Can you please post how many questions you had in each section??? Thanks!

27-25-25-23-26

Posted: **Mon Jun 11, 2012 11:47 pm**

Shasha Dew Dew wrote:It all matters on the Red Panda....where was he in your section?

Mine was experimental I think, 5 LR 26 [last question was Red Panda}

max55 wrote:
Shasha Dew Dew wrote:Yes, I remember they were

RC - LR 26 - LR 25- LG - LR 26
Mine was
LR (don't remember) - LR 26 (I think) - RC 27 - LR 26 - LG 23.

Which section on your LR do you think was experimental? I think mine was the first one.

I don't remember seeing red panda, but there was CPU in my LR (section 2) and Pluto in LR (section 4). How may questions were in your CPU LR section?

(Is this too specific? If so, I will remove. Thanks!)

Posted: **Mon Jun 11, 2012 11:49 pm**

I had RC-25-25-LG-26

I don't remember red pandas but I do remember Pluto and I think I remember CPU.

Posted: **Mon Jun 11, 2012 11:49 pm**

Deleted

Top Law Schools

RC-LR-LR-LG-LR (experimental???) Forum

RC-LR-LR-LG-LR (experimental???)

Re: RC-LR-LR-LG-LR (experimental???)

Re: RC-LR-LR-LG-LR (experimental???)

Re: RC-LR-LR-LG-LR (experimental???)

Re: RC-LR-LR-LG-LR (experimental???)

Re: RC-LR-LR-LG-LR (experimental???)

Re: RC-LR-LR-LG-LR (experimental???)

Re: RC-LR-LR-LG-LR (experimental???)

Re: RC-LR-LR-LG-LR (experimental???)

Re: RC-LR-LR-LG-LR (experimental???)

Re: RC-LR-LR-LG-LR (experimental???)

Re: RC-LR-LR-LG-LR (experimental???)

Re: RC-LR-LR-LG-LR (experimental???)

Re: RC-LR-LR-LG-LR (experimental???)

Re: RC-LR-LR-LG-LR (experimental???)

Re: RC-LR-LR-LG-LR (experimental???)

Re: RC-LR-LR-LG-LR (experimental???)

Re: RC-LR-LR-LG-LR (experimental???)

Re: RC-LR-LR-LG-LR (experimental???)

Re: RC-LR-LR-LG-LR (experimental???)

Re: RC-LR-LR-LG-LR (experimental???)

Re: RC-LR-LR-LG-LR (experimental???)

Re: RC-LR-LR-LG-LR (experimental???)

Re: RC-LR-LR-LG-LR (experimental???)

Re: RC-LR-LR-LG-LR (experimental???)