Top Law Schools

How did it go?

My avatar explains it.

I am a sad little boy right now :,(

lhanvt13 wrote:I am a sad little boy right now :,(

MillerTheThriller wrote:My avatar explains it.

damn bro, I'm sorry.

lhanvt13 wrote:I am a sad little boy right now :,(

Bad games? RC? All around? Anything weird? Anything stand out?

-Edit- Post 1000!

5 year anniversary since Comparative Reading iirc. Any new twists?

That test did not seem like an LSAT.

No sure if it was hard or easy. I literally feel like I got anywhere from a 165-180. :/

bp shinners wrote:

lhanvt13 wrote:I am a sad little boy right now :,(

Bad games? RC? All around? Anything weird? Anything stand out?

-Edit- Post 1000!

Usually games are my strong hold but I felt completely overwhelmed by this one . I usually get -0 and on abnormal circumstances -1. But man oh man did the one get me . Everything else was fine . RC was normal. LR was easier than previous.

Same feeling exactly, different from every PT i've ever took, felt more like a test from the 20 PT range then the 60s

Did you guys see some mapping or pattern games or something?

I suck at games and found them quite straightforward...

Honestly I thought the LG was easy, for me, it was 1 very tough RC passage and very ambiguous LR. LR in my opinion was not the type of LR seen on the vast majority of other tests.

Didn't go as I expected. The desks were super small. I didn't go so good on the LG section because the layout was different. I normally get -1 or -2 but now I think I got -8 or more . I actually think I did better on the LR sections than I normally do. So I will absolutely retake in October or December. My score should be good enough to get me into the score I want to go to..but I know I can do alot better.

The LG section totally blew, the (what seems to be non-experimental) RC section was a little iffy, but all the LR sections and the other RC section I had seemed really goddamn easy. I don't know why, and now I'm nervous. But yeah, I ran out of time on the LG section and just put "c" for like six answers. Sooooo, I probably bombed that one.

I thought it was a bit easier than expected. I will agree that it felt "odd" but for me I think it was a good sort of oddness. Don't want to go into too many details, but I think I did well on games, well on one LR section and probably pretty well on the other two but not 100% sure.

Started off ominously when a bro who only brought his student id became irate upon not being allowed to take the test, which delayed the start. Also, loud rain/thunder + weather sirens + poor lighting = FFFFFUUUUU.

Can anyone recall the LG types they saw on the test?

NewYorkL wrote:Can anyone recall the LG types they saw on the test?

not without getting banned

I honestly think I went perfect on Games although I might have gotten that stupid "If this condition is replaced question" wrong.


If I don't get 165+ it's because of LR. Fuck LR.

DaRascal wrote:I honestly think I went perfect on Games although I might have gotten that stupid "If this condition is replaced question" wrong.


If I don't get 165+ it's because of LR. Fuck LR.

agreed.

NewYorkL wrote:Can anyone recall the LG types they saw on the test?

Yes but it's confidential.

theprophet89 wrote:5 year anniversary since Comparative Reading iirc. Any new twists?

Yes - each LG got two pages. So much space to use I was overwhelmed. And confused when I opened the section.

I don't love it...but I don't hate it.

I thought the LR was EASY. Generally LR is my best section though.

There was one question on the RC that I'm dying to discuss.

agcl0913 wrote:

theprophet89 wrote:5 year anniversary since Comparative Reading iirc. Any new twists?

Yes - each LG got two pages. So much space to use I was overwhelmed. And confused when I opened the section.

are you kidding? wtf?