Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=182476
If this is just an ethics question (so I wouldn't risk being caught), I would 100% look at it. Stakes are way too fucking high to let ethics get in the way. That test can be worth millions after scholarship and career earnings are taken in to account. Honestly, I wouldn't even feel guilty about it. Not really sure why I would.DaRascal wrote:that you were planning to take... weeks before the exam was administered... would you dare...?
Or would you be ethical and set it on fire?
If I had no way of being caught, id look at it.DaRascal wrote:that you were planning to take... weeks before the exam was administered... would you dare...?
Or would you be ethical and set it on fire?
LMAO.NoleMatt wrote:Not only would I look at it, I would do even more unethical things to do so. I would push 6 children out of the way on my way to get the test and commit voter fraud on my way back home.
Geetar Man wrote:LMAO.NoleMatt wrote:Not only would I look at it, I would do even more unethical things to do so. I would push 6 children out of the way on my way to get the test and commit voter fraud on my way back home.
Geetar Man wrote:LMAO.NoleMatt wrote:Not only would I look at it, I would do even more unethical things to do so. I would push 6 children out of the way on my way to get the test and commit voter fraud on my way back home.
Really? Is this before or after you scored 174 haha.bernaldiaz wrote:I'd give $30,000 grand for the LSAT, if it was guaranteed to be the actual one.
Still. If I had the test for even a couple hours extra I would 100% get a 180. I feel like that would be worth it.Geetar Man wrote:Really? Is this before or after you scored 174 haha.bernaldiaz wrote:I'd give $30,000 grand for the LSAT, if it was guaranteed to be the actual one.
I wonder if anyone has actually tried to bribe the proctor, if they were testing alone, which a certain amount of cash.bernaldiaz wrote:Still. If I had the test for even a couple hours extra I would 100% get a 180. I feel like that would be worth it.Geetar Man wrote:Really? Is this before or after you scored 174 haha.bernaldiaz wrote:I'd give $30,000 grand for the LSAT, if it was guaranteed to be the actual one.
That was pretty awesome.gaud wrote:you could just steal it
http://articles.latimes.com/2000/jan/27/local/me-58227
don't really, though
30,000 grand = $30000000?bernaldiaz wrote:I'd give $30,000 grand for the LSAT, if it was guaranteed to be the actual one.
Taylor said one of the student suspects hired a non-USC student at a Hollywood bar to steal the exam from the Law Center during an exam session. The student then took the test in Hawaii and had the answers given to him via his pager, Taylor said. It is not known who actually answered the exam questions that were allegedly given to the student, he said.
The other student allegedly provided the non-student suspect with a fake student identification card in order to gain admittance into the testing area, Taylor said. He said the name of a current engineering student was used on the identification card used to register for the test, but that student was not involved in the robbery.
The suspect who was hired to steal the exam went to the Law Center and sat down to take the exam, Taylor said. About 15 minutes after the test was distributed, he left the room and was pursued by the proctor. Near the intersection of Trousdale and Exposition boulevards, he produced what the proctor described as a switchblade knife in his hand, got into a car and left, Taylor said.
Approximately 100,000 people take this test annually, Vaseleck said. He said this has been the first case he knows about of an armed robbery of an LSAT test.
The difference between a 174/4.0 and a 180/4.0 is what? Going from 90% to 99% at H and 50% to 75% at Y? No way is that worth $30,000.bernaldiaz wrote:I'd give $30,000 grand for the LSAT, if it was guaranteed to be the actual one.
lmao, ethics nerd. The LSAT is so frustrating that I would love to see the damn thing beforehand. However, as for this type of action (doing things solely because I knew that I wouldnt be caught), I feel as if I would follow Lexleon and do the right thing (i.e., not cheat on my gf, not steal from a person/store, etc...). Therefore, I, too, am an ethics nerd for the most part.LexLeon wrote:1. And nullify the value of the months I've spent studying? Hell no.
2. And secure a spot in my school of choice, the Best School, without actually having earned it? Hell no.
3. And act out of such dishonesty, when the truthful option is available and more fun? Hell no.
4. And doubt that I can do as well without having seen it beforehand. Hell no.
5. And count myself as entitled to such a sharp advantage while my brothers and sisters, who have taken the Correct route, may not get what they deserve, due to my dishonest actions? Hell no.
In short, my friend, Hell no, I would not look at it.
I guess. I just think if I was truly secure at HYS then 30k wouldn't matter in the long run.Elston Gunn wrote:The difference between a 174/4.0 and a 180/4.0 is what? Going from 90% to 99% at H and 50% to 75% at Y? No way is that worth $30,000.bernaldiaz wrote:I'd give $30,000 grand for the LSAT, if it was guaranteed to be the actual one.
Hahah shit that's a lot of money. Not sure I could get a loan to cover that.Clearlynotstefan wrote:30,000 grand = $30000000?bernaldiaz wrote:I'd give $30,000 grand for the LSAT, if it was guaranteed to be the actual one.
When trying to take a loan that big out, you answer the question with "I'm spending the weekend in Vegas with Charlie Sheen" and they might be inclined to approve it! lolbernaldiaz wrote:Hahah shit that's a lot of money. Not sure I could get a loan to cover that.Clearlynotstefan wrote:30,000 grand = $30000000?bernaldiaz wrote:I'd give $30,000 grand for the LSAT, if it was guaranteed to be the actual one.
"And what are you planning to use this 30 million dollars for, sir?"
I must endorse the above quotes. Doing it with honor and pride is the only way to go.Geetar Man wrote:lmao, ethics nerd. The LSAT is so frustrating that I would love to see the damn thing beforehand. However, as for this type of action (doing things solely because I knew that I wouldnt be caught), I feel as if I would follow Lexleon and do the right thing (i.e., not cheat on my gf, not steal from a person/store, etc...). Therefore, I, too, am an ethics nerd for the most part.LexLeon wrote:1. And nullify the value of the months I've spent studying? Hell no.
2. And secure a spot in my school of choice, the Best School, without actually having earned it? Hell no.
3. And act out of such dishonesty, when the truthful option is available and more fun? Hell no.
4. And doubt that I can do as well without having seen it beforehand. Hell no.
5. And count myself as entitled to such a sharp advantage while my brothers and sisters, who have taken the Correct route, may not get what they deserve, due to my dishonest actions? Hell no.
In short, my friend, Hell no, I would not look at it.
Its the fucking LSAT we're talking about. Give me that sheeit.
raises handTiago Splitter wrote:Raise your hand if you expected Jeffort's anecdote to head in that direction...
