What do you call this? careless? or fatigued mind?
Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2012 2:25 pm
I have problems with being consistent in LR sections.
If I slow down and loosely timed, I can score -2 to 0 on the LR (time: 40 +/- 2minutes), however, if I get the nerves on under strict 35 minutes timing, I usually get -5 to -8 when I do two LR sections back-to-back (first LR usually has fewer mistakes than the second LR section).
When I review the missed questions, I found that I have very good understanding and pre-pharased answers, they are not that hard at all. Same things happened to my RC as well. When I work on an RC section, I usually get -1 to 0 missing on the first two passages, however, things get much worse in the last two passages (-4 to -6).
In addition, I noticed a pattern for my missed LR questions - weaken/strengthen questions account for more than 90% of my mistakes. For RC, I do pretty well in social and law-related, but poorly in science-related passages, which is a big shame to me, because I have a PhD in science already and have been reading so many dense papers from Science and Nature.
What do you guys call this? careless or fatigued mind? What should I do to make a significant improvement? thanks!
If I slow down and loosely timed, I can score -2 to 0 on the LR (time: 40 +/- 2minutes), however, if I get the nerves on under strict 35 minutes timing, I usually get -5 to -8 when I do two LR sections back-to-back (first LR usually has fewer mistakes than the second LR section).
When I review the missed questions, I found that I have very good understanding and pre-pharased answers, they are not that hard at all. Same things happened to my RC as well. When I work on an RC section, I usually get -1 to 0 missing on the first two passages, however, things get much worse in the last two passages (-4 to -6).
In addition, I noticed a pattern for my missed LR questions - weaken/strengthen questions account for more than 90% of my mistakes. For RC, I do pretty well in social and law-related, but poorly in science-related passages, which is a big shame to me, because I have a PhD in science already and have been reading so many dense papers from Science and Nature.
What do you guys call this? careless or fatigued mind? What should I do to make a significant improvement? thanks!