Top Law Schools

OK so,

- More injuries with grass
- More expensive maintenance with grass

Yet the committee recommends replacing the artificial turf with grass. Why could this be?

Couldn't this be a recruiting matter? As choice E addresses, those who played most of their playing time on grass prefer not to play on artificial turf. The university wants to be able to recruit players with this preference.

Didn't reference the PT, just wanted to comment on the typo of the year. I LOLd.

artificial turd with grass lolollolololol. thank you for making my night

I think that your explanation is just a bit beyond the scope of the stimulus, whereas the correct answer basically addresses the stimulus directly.. more of a direct resolution to the issue because it talks about how the injuries are worse.. i think in LSAC's eyes, E would be irrelevant. jmo.

Difficulty in recruiting athletes would explain the choice to go with natural grass. However, E doesn't give you any substantive information about recruiting preferences. We know that some athletes prefer natural grass but, we don't know how many athletes prefer artificial turf. There might be just as many who prefer turf to grass. E doesn't tell you whether or not grass will be a recruitment benefit or detriment, so we would still not understand why the committee chose not grass.