46-2-6 Forum

Prepare for the LSAT or discuss it with others in this forum.
Post Reply
CREATION

New
Posts: 31
Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2012 8:46 pm

46-2-6

Post by CREATION » Sun Mar 25, 2012 5:51 pm

OK so,

- More injuries with grass
- More expensive maintenance with grass

Yet the committee recommends replacing the artificial turf with grass. Why could this be?

Couldn't this be a recruiting matter? As choice E addresses, those who played most of their playing time on grass prefer not to play on artificial turf. The university wants to be able to recruit players with this preference.
Last edited by CREATION on Mon Mar 26, 2012 7:31 am, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Clearly

Gold
Posts: 4189
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 4:09 pm

Re: 46-2-6

Post by Clearly » Mon Mar 26, 2012 12:36 am

Didn't reference the PT, just wanted to comment on the typo of the year. I LOLd.

User avatar
futurejdgirl

Bronze
Posts: 142
Joined: Sun May 15, 2011 9:30 pm

Re: 46-2-6

Post by futurejdgirl » Mon Mar 26, 2012 12:38 am

artificial turd with grass lolollolololol. thank you for making my night

User avatar
SaintsTheMetal

Bronze
Posts: 429
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2012 5:08 am

Re: 46-2-6

Post by SaintsTheMetal » Mon Mar 26, 2012 5:10 am

I think that your explanation is just a bit beyond the scope of the stimulus, whereas the correct answer basically addresses the stimulus directly.. more of a direct resolution to the issue because it talks about how the injuries are worse.. i think in LSAC's eyes, E would be irrelevant. jmo.

User avatar
suspicious android

Silver
Posts: 919
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 4:54 pm

Re: 46-2-6

Post by suspicious android » Mon Mar 26, 2012 2:23 pm

Difficulty in recruiting athletes would explain the choice to go with natural grass. However, E doesn't give you any substantive information about recruiting preferences. We know that some athletes prefer natural grass but, we don't know how many athletes prefer artificial turf. There might be just as many who prefer turf to grass. E doesn't tell you whether or not grass will be a recruitment benefit or detriment, so we would still not understand why the committee chose not grass.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”