Is there a limit to how many highlighters...
Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2012 11:57 am
Is there a limit to how many highlighters you can bring to the LSAT??
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=180807
LSAC implicates only 1 is allowed.kakaa001 wrote:Is there a limit to how many highlighters you can bring to the LSAT??
LSAC wrote: Items Allowed in the Test Room
Test takers may bring into the test room only a clear plastic ziplock bag, maximum size one gallon (3.79 liter), which must be stored under the chair and may be accessed only during the break. The sealed ziplock bag may contain only the following items: valid ID; wallet; keys; analog (nondigital) wristwatch; medical or hygiene products; #2 or HB wooden pencils, a highlighter, erasers, pencil sharpener (no mechanical pencils); tissues; and beverage in plastic container or juice box (20 oz./591 ml maximum size) and snack for break only. No aluminum cans permitted. All items must fit in the ziplock bag such that the bag can be sealed.
Aren't there two-in-one highlighters?kakaa001 wrote:Thanks for looking into this!
I wanted to bring at least two. I find it useful for diagramming LR to use a different highlighter for each premise (if multiple premises are present) and the conclusion.
I'll train myself to use only one.
Try underlining the sub conclusions, braketing the conclusions with a pencil.kakaa001 wrote:Thanks for looking into this!
I wanted to bring at least two. I find it useful for diagramming LR to use a different highlighter for each premise (if multiple premises are present) and the conclusion.
I'll train myself to use only one.
I do use it to draw the set-up/schedule/whatever the hell the prompt asks for in LG. Definitely useful and a good use of time instead of drawing 15 setups per problem set.lovejopd wrote:I would not use a highlighter in LR. may use it in to draw a nice set-up in Game....I wish I could use a ruler instead of a highlighter though...
I don't know where you are learning these techniques but this sounds like a horrible waste of time. You don't need to identify multiply premises to properly diagnose what is being said. For most questions the most important thing to find is the conclusionary statement and the main sentence that explains why this is the conclusion. After you do this then you should have a full understanding of the argument. This works great for almost all question types. Maybe that's what you are doing but you just worded it differently. I don't know why a simple underline wouldn't work.kakaa001 wrote:Thanks for looking into this!
I wanted to bring at least two. I find it useful for diagramming LR to use a different highlighter for each premise (if multiple premises are present) and the conclusion.
I'll train myself to use only one.