At this point in my prep, am I on the right track?
Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 7:23 pm
So far, I have been through all the PS books, drilled games Pithypike style, and have done a little over 20 PTs. Questions missed per PT looks something like this: LG 0-1, LR 2-6 (total), RC 0-5, typically scoring in the low 170s. On average for LR, I would say parallel Q's account for 1-2 misses per PT, and time issues account for 0-2 misses, other misses are just dumb mistakes/misreading etc.
My plan from now until Feb is as follows: Wake up, do a LG section from an old test, take a short break, then take a 5 section PT with the extra section being a RC section I've already done (probably at least two weeks since I last looked at it). After that, I'd take a 1-2 hour break and come back and review the PT. When reviewing the PT, I will conduct an extremely careful analysis of missed LR questions or questions I was unsure about, and skim the rest. I probably won't look at LG very much when reviewing (shouldn’t need to) and I will look at RC questions missed and try to see why my answer was wrong/why the correct answer was right, but won't reread the passage or spend too much time on it as I will be redoing that passage in the future anyway.
I'd like to know what you think of this plan. Specifically, in regards to how I plan to review PTs and my decision not to do any LR drilling by question type (although I may drill parallel Q's at some point). I already know the techniques and do fairly well on LR in general, and I need to work on finishing faster, so I feel like the practice I get from doing PTs is better than what I would get from drilling.
In anticipation of some objections, I do not have a job/am not in school so burnout should hopefully not be a factor.
My plan from now until Feb is as follows: Wake up, do a LG section from an old test, take a short break, then take a 5 section PT with the extra section being a RC section I've already done (probably at least two weeks since I last looked at it). After that, I'd take a 1-2 hour break and come back and review the PT. When reviewing the PT, I will conduct an extremely careful analysis of missed LR questions or questions I was unsure about, and skim the rest. I probably won't look at LG very much when reviewing (shouldn’t need to) and I will look at RC questions missed and try to see why my answer was wrong/why the correct answer was right, but won't reread the passage or spend too much time on it as I will be redoing that passage in the future anyway.
I'd like to know what you think of this plan. Specifically, in regards to how I plan to review PTs and my decision not to do any LR drilling by question type (although I may drill parallel Q's at some point). I already know the techniques and do fairly well on LR in general, and I need to work on finishing faster, so I feel like the practice I get from doing PTs is better than what I would get from drilling.
In anticipation of some objections, I do not have a job/am not in school so burnout should hopefully not be a factor.