RC LR LG RC LR
Posted: Sat Dec 03, 2011 3:58 pm
Second RC experimental? Hope so.
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=172947
Could LSAC also switch around the ordering of the passages within a section from one version to the next? They're sneaky.dietcoke0 wrote:I dunno, the first RC on the first section did not spill over into a second column. I noticed the guy next to me, at the fifth section RC his first section did not spill over into a second section (he was borrowing my sharpen at the beginning of the section, so I noticed it then.) Or maybe he just didn't have it turned to the first RC passage right away.
I agree, and wanted to ask everyone around me walking to the train, but didn't have the guts.stephinmd wrote:Could LSAC also switch around the ordering of the passages within a section from one version to the next? They're sneaky.dietcoke0 wrote:I dunno, the first RC on the first section did not spill over into a second column. I noticed the guy next to me, at the fifth section RC his first section did not spill over into a second section (he was borrowing my sharpen at the beginning of the section, so I noticed it then.) Or maybe he just didn't have it turned to the first RC passage right away.
Blackmail / Latina Autobiographies / Land Plot New Topsoil was real bro. I only had one RCfashiongirl wrote:2nd RC blackmail was experimental. I was HOPING the other one was experimental. The 4th RC passage in the scored section sucked for me.
This sounds like what I did...did the first two, then the 4th, and then I had to skim the comparative. Blargh.fashiongirl wrote:Oh yeah. That's what I meant. Idk why I put blackmail was exp...I guess I really hated that one. Also I meant the 5th RC (my 2nd RC, the scored one) sucked for me. I must have been in LSAT hungover-ness.
Anyway the scored RC effing killed me. It was my last section too so I was so mad that I got another RC, i wasted about 6 mins rereading the last passage (started with that one) which turned out to be the hardest and so I didn't have enough time to finish the comparative since I did that one last.
My experimental had commissioning art as humanities and negative evidence as comparative/science...can't remember the other two. All I remember was my experimental reading comp was hard unlike what most people are saying about theirs. About equal difficulty between my two RC sections (I averaged -2 to -3 over 30 PTs)ColumbiaChamp wrote:I want to take an LSAT with the exprimental RC from this test sometime in the future, oh that would be nice. did y'all have hapiness & wealth comparative as the exp RC?
I'm almost 100% sure they don't do thisstephinmd wrote:Could LSAC also switch around the ordering of the passages within a section from one version to the next? They're sneaky.dietcoke0 wrote:I dunno, the first RC on the first section did not spill over into a second column. I noticed the guy next to me, at the fifth section RC his first section did not spill over into a second section (he was borrowing my sharpen at the beginning of the section, so I noticed it then.) Or maybe he just didn't have it turned to the first RC passage right away.
I pray to sweet baby he-zeus that this was the experimental RC. The proctor must've roofied me. I have a vague recollection of the comparative science one, but otherwise I cannot remember answering any of those questions.My experimental had commissioning art as humanities and negative evidence as comparative/science...can't remember the other two. All I remember was my experimental reading comp was hard unlike what most people are saying about theirs. About equal difficulty between my two RC sections (I averaged -2 to -3 over 30 PTs)
they were both 27 questions. real had archives, latinas, blackmail, topsoil.jeremydc wrote:Was the first rc like 27 questions, if so I ended up guessing on the final 4, please let it be the experimental!