ADVICE NEEDED--December LSAT disadvantage?
Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2011 12:38 pm
Hi all,
I'm looking for some general advice. I took the October 2011 LSAT and found out yesterday that I got a 165. I had been practice testing at about an average of 173, so I was pretty disappointed with that score, even though I was expecting it after the test day. I'm looking for advice on where to go from here. I have a 3.9 GPA from a top university and was hoping to get a mid-high 170s LSAT so that I could be competitive at a top 10 law school (possibly even a HYS). How much of a disadvantage is taking a December LSAT and having to apply late? Would most people advise waiting a year and applying for the next cycle or is that unnecessary? Also, I've heard very wide ranges of opinions on whether law schools really average your scores or take your best (I'm obviously hoping for the latter). Thoughts???
Thanks!
I'm looking for some general advice. I took the October 2011 LSAT and found out yesterday that I got a 165. I had been practice testing at about an average of 173, so I was pretty disappointed with that score, even though I was expecting it after the test day. I'm looking for advice on where to go from here. I have a 3.9 GPA from a top university and was hoping to get a mid-high 170s LSAT so that I could be competitive at a top 10 law school (possibly even a HYS). How much of a disadvantage is taking a December LSAT and having to apply late? Would most people advise waiting a year and applying for the next cycle or is that unnecessary? Also, I've heard very wide ranges of opinions on whether law schools really average your scores or take your best (I'm obviously hoping for the latter). Thoughts???
Thanks!