Top Law Schools

Is it 1st or 3rd? I remember the 3rd one having a very long question (near the end) that took up half a page in text...

1st LR I believe.

941law wrote:1st LR I believe.

Rational?

.

asunshinee wrote:The one with the extremely long principle question was not your experimental.

Again: rational?

i had LR LG LR LR RC as well. 3rd lr was much tougher than the 1st. People with 2 LR sections said that they had the extremely long half-page question #18? I think. If this is the case then the experimental lr was 1. :'(

duberville wrote:
Again: rational?

not sure what you mean?

941law wrote:

duberville wrote:
Again: rational?

not sure what you mean?

Rationale*

MrBain_ wrote:i had LR LG LR LR RC as well. 3rd lr was much tougher than the 1st. People with 2 LR sections said that they had the extremely long half-page question #18? I think. If this is the case then the experimental lr was 1. :'(

*sigh* yeah the first LR on my test was motherfucking easy. And, as I thought, it was the experimental.

tyro wrote:

MrBain_ wrote:i had LR LG LR LR RC as well. 3rd lr was much tougher than the 1st. People with 2 LR sections said that they had the extremely long half-page question #18? I think. If this is the case then the experimental lr was 1. :'(

*sigh* yeah the first LR on my test was motherfucking easy. And, as I thought, it was the experimental.

Didn't you find the 2nd LR rather more difficult than normal?

Yeah the 2nd LR and 3rd LR were difficult.

1st was experimental

I also had LR-LG-LR LR-RC
First LR was easy for me with 25 questions in it. Second one with 26 questions was very difficult with al those questions which took entire page. My third section had 26 questions as well. So I left test center being sure what second LR ( difficult one) was experimental. And now it is turned out what it was real.

duberville wrote:

tyro wrote:

MrBain_ wrote:i had LR LG LR LR RC as well. 3rd lr was much tougher than the 1st. People with 2 LR sections said that they had the extremely long half-page question #18? I think. If this is the case then the experimental lr was 1. :'(

*sigh* yeah the first LR on my test was motherfucking easy. And, as I thought, it was the experimental.

Didn't you find the 2nd LR rather more difficult than normal?

Actually I found the third one (second real one) to be the toughest, but all of them seemed pretty simple for me. The experimental was a joke though. But anyway, I got SLAUGHTERED on the games and I think at least -5 on RC.

I'm expecting no better than a 165

I went LG LR LG RC LR Which was experimental?

the real LG was the one parking spots and bikes...



I had LR LG LR LR RC but I could have sworn that the second was experimental because I thought there was a ton of flaw questions in it which seemed abnormal to me...

lawschoolboundfuture wrote:I went LG LR LG RC LR Which was experimental?

the games section that did not have the game on ambassadors.

asunshinee wrote:The one with the extremely long principle question was not your experimental.

Yes, I had that question as well, and had RC exp. Saved it for last because I was getting close on time.

LIST HOW MANY QUESTIONS YOUR LR SECTIONS HAD (sec1 25 sec3 26 sec4 26. section 3 has to be experimental for me then right? lsac has never had an experimental section on section 4 and 5. I am just gonna assume this to continue. And people without LR LR LR had 25 and 26 questions. Plus the questions were fkin weird in section 3

I had 25 and 26, so guessing #3?

Historically, there was an LR section with 25 qs and one with 26 qs.
I haven't really seen both LR sections containing 26 qs each.
So since the first one had 25, second 26, and third 26, I would assume that the second LR (3rd, if considering the entire sections) was experimental.

rivermaker wrote:LIST HOW MANY QUESTIONS YOUR LR SECTIONS HAD (sec1 25 sec3 26 sec4 26. section 3 has to be experimental for me then right? lsac has never had an experimental section on section 4 and 5. I am just gonna assume this to continue. And people without LR LR LR had 25 and 26 questions. Plus the questions were fkin weird in section 3

I don't understand why it had to be section 3 for you?

05shinjo wrote:Historically, there was an LR section with 25 qs and one with 26 qs.
I haven't really seen both LR sections containing 26 qs each.
So since the first one had 25, second 26, and third 26, I would assume that the second LR (3rd, if considering the entire sections) was experimental.

Eh, A recent test had two 26s, maybe Dec 2010? Had 102 scored. Don't feel like looking at my PT

yeah it is for sure 25 and 26 for the real LR, but some people are either trolling / or im fkd that section 4 was experimental for the first time in lsat history.

941law wrote:

rivermaker wrote:LIST HOW MANY QUESTIONS YOUR LR SECTIONS HAD (sec1 25 sec3 26 sec4 26. section 3 has to be experimental for me then right? lsac has never had an experimental section on section 4 and 5. I am just gonna assume this to continue. And people without LR LR LR had 25 and 26 questions. Plus the questions were fkin weird in section 3

I don't understand why it had to be section 3 for you?

a 25 and 26 were scored. People had a 25, 26 break 26, and since the exp is always first three, just logic game after that

I had LG-LR-RC-RC-LR. And I had a long-ass half page principle question.