I feel that it is "any history book gives only a distorted view of the past"
I feel that everything else in the stimulus supports that idea.
Am I correct in that assessment?
What is the main conclusion of #19, PT 63 Section 3 Forum
- timmydoeslsat
- Posts: 148
- Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2011 2:07 pm
-
- Posts: 744
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2010 8:43 am
Re: What is the main conclusion of #19, PT 63 Section 3
I'd agree with you, but I wouldn't bet a lot of money.
But, as usual, the LSAT constructs the question in such a way that our geeky-nit-pickiness (which, Timmydoeslsat, you know is a compliment) doesn't matter. Regardless of which conclusion is the conclusion, the other one is part of a similar argument used to support the other.
But, as usual, the LSAT constructs the question in such a way that our geeky-nit-pickiness (which, Timmydoeslsat, you know is a compliment) doesn't matter. Regardless of which conclusion is the conclusion, the other one is part of a similar argument used to support the other.