Top Law Schools

Question 22: Answer B

Doesn't my hypothetical prove that both C (a bridge directly connects L with O) and A (no bridge directly connects L with M) could be correct? Did I mess up somewhere?

Rules:
*Each bridge directly connects exactly two islands with each other/no intersections
*No island has more than three bridges connecting it directly with other islands
*J/K/L are each directly connected by bridge with one or both of M/O
*J is directly connected with exactly two islands
*K is directly connected with exactly one island
*A bridge directly connects J and O and a bridge directly connects M and O

bump

Question 22 specifies that you need to directly connect K with O. Other than that, your hypo does follow the global rules.