PT32.S4.Q25 LR
Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2011 7:01 am
i always thought that the second person would misunderstand/misinterpret the meaning of something that the first person had said, but according to the answer of this question (PT32.S4.Q25 LR) what Helena meant was understood by Jay for the most part and that threw me off. my first instinct was to prephrase an answer in my head like this:
jay must have though that Helena had said "ALL children of introverts adopted by extroverts become extroverts" but that was not an answer choice, instead the answer choice seem to be a direct rephrasing of the very first sentence of what Helena had said.
so from this, do we understand that sometimes answers to this type of question can be thought of as the second person might have fully understood what the first person had said?
i hope someone can shed some light on this.
jay must have though that Helena had said "ALL children of introverts adopted by extroverts become extroverts" but that was not an answer choice, instead the answer choice seem to be a direct rephrasing of the very first sentence of what Helena had said.
so from this, do we understand that sometimes answers to this type of question can be thought of as the second person might have fully understood what the first person had said?
i hope someone can shed some light on this.