June 2011 LG Opinions Forum

[justbubbles]

Thoughts?

[smithryan94]

I had two LG. LG-LR-LG//RC-LR

I thought the first one was above average difficulty and the second one was below average. As a reference I'm usually -0 to -3

[smithryan94]

Anyone with that format know which is experimental?

[justbubbles]

For those that got just one LG section, please PM me! Thanks!

[acirilli1722]

.

[citykitty]

...

[justbubbles]

The LG appeared for those who had just one LG was the real time.

If that's you, then send me a PM!

[cvntstscrty]

LSAC’s “Instructions for the Day of the Test” state: “Legal action may be taken against anyone who removes test materials and/or reproduces test material in any way, or shares LSAT test content prior to LSAC’s disclosure of that test.” This includes specific question content from the unscored section of the test. Please refrain from further discussion of ALL December 2010 LSAT questions.

Caveon Test Security is a test security vendor for LSAC.

[justbubbles]

LSAC’s “Instructions for the Day of the Test” state: “Legal action may be taken against anyone who removes test materials and/or reproduces test material in any way, or shares LSAT test content prior to LSAC’s disclosure of that test.” This includes specific question content from the unscored section of the test. Please refrain from further discussion of ALL December 2010 LSAT questions.

Caveon Test Security is a test security vendor for LSAC.

With all due respect, I think people are more interested in discussing the June 2011 test as opposed to the December 2010 questions, which have already been released by LSAC.

[BLDGbloc]

LSAC’s “Instructions for the Day of the Test” state: “Legal action may be taken against anyone who removes test materials and/or reproduces test material in any way, or shares LSAT test content prior to LSAC’s disclosure of that test.” This includes specific question content from the unscored section of the test. Please refrain from further discussion of ALL December 2010 LSAT questions.

Caveon Test Security is a test security vendor for LSAC.

With all due respect, I think people are more interested in discussing the June 2011 test as opposed to the December 2010 questions, which have already been released by LSAC.

Burn.

[mille295]

I had 2 LG sections. First I found pretty difficult... Filled in answers randomly for more than I would have liked. Second I finished with time to spare, knowing I got all of them right... Also found out that was the experimental section.

Hating my life right now. Drinking a glass of wine to calm my nerves before I decide whether or not to cancel.

[mac35352]

I got two LGs as well..pm me if u only had one

[mrwarre85]

I thought games were easier than usual. That said, I wrote a rule down wrong on a game and didn't have time to fix the damage. I probably missed 5 on the whole section which is a real bummer because I did think that these games were weak.

Especially my game on the first page it was so easy I was convinced that the section was the experimental.

[CJJ96812]

EDITED BY TLS MODS

[vissidarte27]

I thought the third game was really hard, the one with the cars. I remember the first two being easy and the last one being kind of average. But I had to guess on several in the third game.

[imbored25]

i just had one LG, thought it was pretty easy, but LG is always my best section, RC killed me

[postn0bills]

LSAC’s “Instructions for the Day of the Test” state: “Legal action may be taken against anyone who removes test materials and/or reproduces test material in any way, or shares LSAT test content prior to LSAC’s disclosure of that test.” This includes specific question content from the unscored section of the test. Please refrain from further discussion of ALL December 2010 LSAT questions.

Caveon Test Security is a test security vendor for LSAC.

With all due respect, I think people are more interested in discussing the June 2011 test as opposed to the December 2010 questions, which have already been released by LSAC.

AMAZING.

[postn0bills]

I thought games were easier than usual. That said, I wrote a rule down wrong on a game and didn't have time to fix the damage. I probably missed 5 on the whole section which is a real bummer because I did think that these games were weak.

Especially my game on the first page it was so easy I was convinced that the section was the experimental.

+1

I was convinced it was experimental and I think slowed down because of it. I finished the first game in five minutes and thought there was no way it was real. Had to guess on the last game blindly because I slowed down after that as I didn't think it counted. Horrible.

[pandabear]

LG has always been my worst section but i thought they were pretty easy. the first game literally took like three minutes to do. RC, on the other hand...

[cindypopper]

So which one counted? Does anyone know. I had LG-LR-LG..RC-LR

[echo]

So which one counted? Does anyone know. I had LG-LR-LG..RC-LR

I had the same set up. I am hoping the first was real but I have a bad feeling that my second LG was second. Unfortunately my brain feels like mush so I can't even remember enough to distinguish the two.

[Ginj]

So which one counted? Does anyone know. I had LG-LR-LG..RC-LR

I had this as well.

[handlesthetruth]

.

[Ssushi]

So which one counted? Does anyone know. I had LG-LR-LG..RC-LR

I had this as well.

Same. First one crushed me but 3rd was fine.

[neeko]

Did anyone else have trouble with the balls or did I just miss something?