Top Law Schools

Yay or Nay?

Are we allowed to refer to each section by a general topic name?

Not sure. If in doubt, always PM.

For those who had only one RC section, please send me a PM. Thanks!

.

Fair warning: these posts could be in violation of test taker contract with LSAC. Test takers have entered into a contract with LSAC that they will not discuss with others the test questions they have taken. These offending posts will be reported to the LSAC for appropriate action which could include submitting violators to the LSAC Misconduct Subcommittee.

Caveon Test Security is a test security vendor for LSAC.

only section i think killed me

cvntstscrty wrote:Fair warning: these posts could be in violation of test taker contract with LSAC. Test takers have entered into a contract with LSAC that they will not discuss with others the test questions they have taken. These offending posts will be reported to the LSAC for appropriate action which could include submitting violators to the LSAC Misconduct Subcommittee.

Caveon Test Security is a test security vendor for LSAC.

This is a red herring and a specious interpretation. Discussion of explicit (or implied) questions is not akin to discussing general feedback about the test in general.

Mom: "Son, how was your test?"
Son: "Mom, it was okay"
Mom: "Did you find it difficult?"
Son: "Somewhat"
LSAC: "Mom & Son, you're running afoul of a contractual agreement with LSAC".

Please.

cvntstscrty wrote:Fair warning: these posts could be in violation of test taker contract with LSAC. Test takers have entered into a contract with LSAC that they will not discuss with others the test questions they have taken. These offending posts will be reported to the LSAC for appropriate action which could include submitting violators to the LSAC Misconduct Subcommittee.

Caveon Test Security is a test security vendor for LSAC.

LOL come at me bro

Agreed. Thinking about cancelling because of this section. Kate Chopin was terrible...spent at least 12 minutes on that passage and then I had to rush through the sea floor and objectivism ones. Probably got a minus 7 at least. I was only missing one or two on my practice tests.

Seriously considering canceling my score. Randomly filled in a bubble for... 12? 14? It was my last section, couldn't focus. Terrible. Terrible. Terrible.

By far my worst section. I thought the games/arguments were below average in difficulty, but this section killed me

I think the consensus pretty much is: most people didn't do well on RC, right?

The experimental RC damn near killed me. I was so thankful for another RC later on in the test.

jayz4 wrote:Kate Chopin was terrible…

+1

It was hard but i don't think it was anymore difficult than the 50's PT ones. RC is my worst section though so i most likely have no clue what im talking about.

I left feeling like I guessed on every question. What a nightmare.

Experimental RC was crucial....then the real RC was my last section...I'm usually decent at RC but ended up guessing on a WHOLE passage Didn't even read the objectivism passage.....fucking Kate Chopin

Chopin didn't bother me, but the sea floor...Jesus...

The whole section sucked for me...jesussssssssss

Ginj wrote:Chopin didn't bother me, but the sea floor...Jesus...

Me too. Didn't think Chopin was hard at all, but all that geology made me go "...huh?"

Is it worth canceling? I think I did okay on the other sections....but I know I screwed up RC

The electricity went out during this section for like a minute! Lots of people freaked out! But the proctor gave us a minute...

Ginj wrote:Chopin didn't bother me, but the sea floor...Jesus...

+1

I hate the ocean. And magnets. WTF are grains?!?

Ha.

EDIT: I think I did well on certain parts of the RC. Other parts, not so much.