June 2011 LR
Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2011 5:39 pm
Hello Quidnuncs!
How was the LR compared to previous exams?
How was the LR compared to previous exams?
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=157166
This. I had LR first and I thought that was experimental until later on, because that LR was so easy. Then I got reamed by my actual experimental section.jortiz682 wrote:Generally agree. 2 was certainly tricker than the 1st. I found the 1st to be almost exceptionally easy.
What makes you think the first one wasn't the experimental?citykitty wrote:This. I had LR first and I thought that was experimental until later on, because that LR was so easy. Then I got reamed by my actual experimental section.jortiz682 wrote:Generally agree. 2 was certainly tricker than the 1st. I found the 1st to be almost exceptionally easy.
Bc, I had a different type of exp section.upandup wrote:What makes you think the first one wasn't the experimental?citykitty wrote:This. I had LR first and I thought that was experimental until later on, because that LR was so easy. Then I got reamed by my actual experimental section.jortiz682 wrote:Generally agree. 2 was certainly tricker than the 1st. I found the 1st to be almost exceptionally easy.
I agree with this, but LR2 was my last section so maybe it was just fatigue.gggrra wrote:Short LR section (25 Q): easier than average
Long LR section (26 Q): on par; maybe slightly harder but probably not
Conclusion: slightly easier than average.
+1 Same here.mille295 wrote:Usually after I finish a PT, I feel the least confident about LR. Not the case this time. Between my 2 LGs and RC, I can barely remember the LR sections because I thought the others were much more difficult.
I had the same format, and I'm pretty sure that the second LR (with 24 questions) was experimental. I thought for sure it would've been the first one since it was so easy, but then the test would only have 100 questions (plus people here who had another experimental said that their LRs were 25 and 26 Qs).imbored25 wrote:I had LR LG LR LR RC, i thought the first LR was pretty easy so im hoping it wasn't the exp. the second LR i had trouble with and felt was harder than average, third LR was ok
that would be awesome, also i thought the exp section would always be harder than the other ones not easier, at least that's what i gathered from reading through other posts regarding previous exp sections.vissidarte27 wrote:I had the same format, and I'm pretty sure that the second LR (with 24 questions) was experimental. I thought for sure it would've been the first one since it was so easy, but then the test would only have 100 questions (plus people here who had another experimental said that their LRs were 25 and 26 Qs).imbored25 wrote:I had LR LG LR LR RC, i thought the first LR was pretty easy so im hoping it wasn't the exp. the second LR i had trouble with and felt was harder than average, third LR was ok
I think you must be right. I had LG experimental, and LR1 was 25 questions and LR2 was 26 I believe.vissidarte27 wrote:I had the same format, and I'm pretty sure that the second LR (with 24 questions) was experimental. I thought for sure it would've been the first one since it was so easy, but then the test would only have 100 questions (plus people here who had another experimental said that their LRs were 25 and 26 Qs).imbored25 wrote:I had LR LG LR LR RC, i thought the first LR was pretty easy so im hoping it wasn't the exp. the second LR i had trouble with and felt was harder than average, third LR was ok
I'm with you that the 25Q one was easier. I'd say the 26 was leaning towards slightly harder though. Or maybe it just seemed like that because the 25Q and the experimental (mine was LR) were both easier than this one.gggrra wrote:Short LR section (25 Q): easier than average
Long LR section (26 Q): on par; maybe slightly harder but probably not
Conclusion: slightly easier than average.
Quit spammingCJJ96812 wrote:http://twitter.com/JuanDonTheMan
This guy is a lover of LSAT and Mexican literature. He took it today, says what he thinks curve will be. Not sure if I agree or not. I thought it was a little harder than he did.
+1Ssushi wrote:I agree with this, but LR2 was my last section so maybe it was just fatigue.gggrra wrote:Short LR section (25 Q): easier than average
Long LR section (26 Q): on par; maybe slightly harder but probably not
Conclusion: slightly easier than average.