Page 1 of 1

Rule Equivalency question..isn't this a good way to attack?

Posted: Mon May 23, 2011 12:22 pm
by secretad
When faced with rule equivalency questions, I usually go back through my hypotheticals (usually 3-4) and see that those rules in the answer choices would violate themselves in those scenarios. And one answer choice does not, and that is the one I pick.

Am I missing something here or isn't that the easiest way to do it?

Re: Rule Equivalency question..isn't this a good way to attack?

Posted: Mon May 23, 2011 1:04 pm
by suspicious android
It's a good method, but frequently will leave more than one answer choice.

Re: Rule Equivalency question..isn't this a good way to attack?

Posted: Mon May 23, 2011 1:08 pm
by secretad
What's the best way after you have eliminated 2-3 of the possible answers?

Re: Rule Equivalency question..isn't this a good way to attack?

Posted: Mon May 23, 2011 6:25 pm
by soj
This might help.

Re: Rule Equivalency question..isn't this a good way to attack?

Posted: Mon May 23, 2011 7:18 pm
by tomwatts
Also the topics linked from here.

Re: Rule Equivalency question..isn't this a good way to attack?

Posted: Wed May 25, 2011 12:45 pm
by Manhattan LSAT Noah
we have a paper on our site about this question type.

If you can't find it under lsat resources, pm me and I'll shoot you the link.