Rule Equivalency question..isn't this a good way to attack? Forum

secretad · Post by **secretad** » Mon May 23, 2011 12:22 pm

When faced with rule equivalency questions, I usually go back through my hypotheticals (usually 3-4) and see that those rules in the answer choices would violate themselves in those scenarios. And one answer choice does not, and that is the one I pick.

Am I missing something here or isn't that the easiest way to do it?

suspicious android · Post by **suspicious android** » Mon May 23, 2011 1:04 pm

It's a good method, but frequently will leave more than one answer choice.

secretad · Post by **secretad** » Mon May 23, 2011 1:08 pm

What's the best way after you have eliminated 2-3 of the possible answers?

soj · Post by **soj** » Mon May 23, 2011 6:25 pm

This might help.

tomwatts · Post by **tomwatts** » Mon May 23, 2011 7:18 pm

Also the topics linked from here.

Manhattan LSAT Noah · Post by **Manhattan LSAT Noah** » Wed May 25, 2011 12:45 pm

we have a paper on our site about this question type.

If you can't find it under lsat resources, pm me and I'll shoot you the link.

Rule Equivalency question..isn't this a good way to attack? Forum

Rule Equivalency question..isn't this a good way to attack?

Re: Rule Equivalency question..isn't this a good way to attack?

Re: Rule Equivalency question..isn't this a good way to attack?

Re: Rule Equivalency question..isn't this a good way to attack?

Re: Rule Equivalency question..isn't this a good way to attack?

Re: Rule Equivalency question..isn't this a good way to attack?

Register now to search topics and post comments!