-9 total in LR on PrepTest 53, So Upset
Posted: Fri May 06, 2011 9:01 pm
Most of the answer overviews on Manhattan's website either does not feature the problem I missed or its explanation does not target my concerns.
I am having serious concerns over these questions. Let me start with the last LR question I missed.
Section 3, #24: The professor's argument proceeds by
I do not see an analogy in this stimulus, so C is dismissed.
I see so many answer choices about general principles. How is this a principle? There is nothing I see in the stimulus about there being a principle.
What is a general principle then? I thought it was something that is of a prescriptive nature, such as "should."
Anyway, that one is really irking me, along with, Section 3 #23: Parallel the reasoning.
I went through the answer choices after reading the stimulus with this reasoning in mind: It is not the action that causes the harm or threat, but rather the rate of it.
Needless to say, none of the answer choices jumped out. Then to see that D is the right answer? How is that right, it can't parallel it because it has no concept of rate?
Section 3, #7, Which one of the following logically completes the argument?
This one really halted me in my "ten questions in ten minutes of less strategy."
I got rid of C, D, and E.
Now it is between A and B. A is the right answer. How in the world is it the right answer? I am very interested in hearing how I am supposed to know what the fulfillment of "its" goals is? How do I know what the goals of a teacher are? They are never expressed in the stimulus?
I am having serious concerns over these questions. Let me start with the last LR question I missed.
Section 3, #24: The professor's argument proceeds by
I do not see an analogy in this stimulus, so C is dismissed.
I see so many answer choices about general principles. How is this a principle? There is nothing I see in the stimulus about there being a principle.
What is a general principle then? I thought it was something that is of a prescriptive nature, such as "should."
Anyway, that one is really irking me, along with, Section 3 #23: Parallel the reasoning.
I went through the answer choices after reading the stimulus with this reasoning in mind: It is not the action that causes the harm or threat, but rather the rate of it.
Needless to say, none of the answer choices jumped out. Then to see that D is the right answer? How is that right, it can't parallel it because it has no concept of rate?
Section 3, #7, Which one of the following logically completes the argument?
This one really halted me in my "ten questions in ten minutes of less strategy."
I got rid of C, D, and E.
Now it is between A and B. A is the right answer. How in the world is it the right answer? I am very interested in hearing how I am supposed to know what the fulfillment of "its" goals is? How do I know what the goals of a teacher are? They are never expressed in the stimulus?