Top Law Schools

.

I plan on taking my next test tomorrow, and hopefully the STEEP improvement will continue. At this rate my 170's goal can still be reached, but I mus keep up the pace.

I'm confused...are you just planning to repeat those tests again and again? Getting a 170 on a test previously taken doesn't mean you're averaging that score. Obviously retaking tests are imporant, but your scores on repeated attempts are not indicative of a real test score, I believe its more to review previous errors. I mean no offense, but what you've posted really doesn't make any sense.

I hope your reviewing these exams and not just repeating your mistakes.

emarxnj wrote:I'm confused...are you just planning to repeat those tests again and again? Getting a 170 on a test previously taken doesn't mean you're averaging that score. Obviously retaking tests are imporant, but your scores on repeated attempts are not indicative of a real test score, I believe its more to review previous errors. I mean no offense, but what you've posted really doesn't make any sense.

Yes. And I don't really understand why what I posted doesn't make sense. Please explain.

youarereadingthis wrote:I hope your reviewing these exams and not just repeating your mistakes.

I'm doing a very light review at most. Not any long review, as that would probably throw off my scores.

LOL this is too funny.

Logic STUD wrote:

emarxnj wrote:I'm confused...are you just planning to repeat those tests again and again? Getting a 170 on a test previously taken doesn't mean you're averaging that score. Obviously retaking tests are imporant, but your scores on repeated attempts are not indicative of a real test score, I believe its more to review previous errors. I mean no offense, but what you've posted really doesn't make any sense.

Yes. And I don't really understand why what I posted doesn't make sense. Please explain.

Well, for starters, how do you think that you're getting closer to a 170+ score? You're average around 145 at a glance. I'm not saying you can't improve, but just repeating the exams until you get the score you want isn't helping you learn anything, its just memorization. From what I understand, and I certainly don't claim to be an expert, the scores of the re-takes aren't as important as recognizing patterns and mistakes you previously made. You seem to be using them as a gauge of actual test performance. Again, I'm not argueing that retaking/reviewing PTs isn't important, it certainly is, but you seem to have deluded yourself into thinking that if you keep doing PTs until you get 170, thats how you'll do on the actual test. If my assumptions about the purpose of retaking PTs is wrong, someone please tell me.


Am I misunderstanding?
Or am I feeding a troll here?

worst flame I've seen in awhile

FloridaCoastalorbust wrote:worst flame I've seen in awhile

The OP or me?

.

emarxnj wrote:Or am I feeding a troll here?

nom nom nom nom

sundance95 wrote:

emarxnj wrote:Or am I feeding a troll here?

nom nom nom nom

Damnt! Years of bite-free forum usage, gone. Oh well.

Be nice to the OP. He's clearly demonstrating an, uh, upward trend.

Feel free to make fun of me, but I'd rather not be a part of it.

this guy is a lunatic. He continues to make crazy statements on our serious threads. On the June study group he wrote he was an LSAT expert and to get back to him if you we had questions. Haha, now he is here posting his ridiculously fake study log. I thought we were not supposed to feed the troll.

emarxnj wrote:

FloridaCoastalorbust wrote:worst flame I've seen in awhile

The OP or me?

OPOPOPOPOPOPOPOPOP