emarxnj wrote:I'm having some trouble with the wording of a particular condition for an LG game. This one in particular says that "H is assembled on line 1 or else line 7". Now, is this just as different way of saying "H is on 1 or 7" or do I somehow give preference to putting H on 1?
You're talking about the last game on PT#30 (December '99).
As described by alexonfyre, for this game it's an exclusive either/or, meaning that one of the two must be true and also that both cannot be true together, making the two things mutually exclusive. Some either/or conditions are inclusive, meaning that the rule requires at least one of the two conditions, but also
ALLOWS for both to be true absent other explicitly stated or contextual/structural derived restrictions.
It is the context of the other game parameters that make it an exclusive either/or in this case since the stimulus dictates a 1-1 correspondence situation. Exactly 7 assembled on 7 lines, exactly 1 to a line, so it cannot be in both 1 & 7 in a valid hypo. As said, the word 'else' was basically included for additional clarity but LSAC didn't have to include it for the game to be the same and still logically valid since the other parameters logically determined whether it was inclusive or exclusive to prohibit BOTH from being possible at the same time.
Either/or relationships trip a lot of people up on the LSAT and have been the core feature of many LG's and LR problems that are rated high difficulty, meaning that a large % of people get them wrong.
The rule of thumb for LSAT purposes is that, interpreted
BY ITSELF, a given rule/premise that dictates either/or that does not also dictate NOT BOTH is inclusive, allowing for the
possibility of both. Exclusive either/or situations are created by the logical context you are reasoning within (the other premises/rules/conditions) if it is not explicitly stated.
This has been played on in several high difficulty in/out grouping games (see birds in the forest game for an inclusive either/or with lots of traps for people that treat it as exclusive) as well as in many hard LR questions.
Bottom line, examine the context/other premises to determine whether BOTH is left open to possibility when in doubt. If nothing says or establishes that you cannot have both, then having both
could be true.