Page 1 of 1
Is experimental always early?
Posted: Sun Feb 13, 2011 1:17 am
by colorando
Just wondering.... as todays LSAT was a blur
I had two LGs (LG LR RC LG LR) on my test, how do you know that the first was experimental? Is the experimental always in the first 3 sections? I'm trying to remember the specifics of the games to compare with other posted experiences but I can't remember
Re: Is experimental always early?
Posted: Sun Feb 13, 2011 1:18 am
by holdencaulfield
No. Experimental is not always early.
Re: Is experimental always early?
Posted: Sun Feb 13, 2011 1:18 am
by Stonewall
Your first section was experimental.
/thread.
Edit: ^ which pt wasn't first three?
Re: Is experimental always early?
Posted: Sun Feb 13, 2011 1:46 am
by SchopenhauerFTW
Stonewall wrote:Your first section was experimental.
/thread.
Edit: ^ which pt wasn't first three?
None.
Re: Is experimental always early?
Posted: Sun Feb 13, 2011 1:51 am
by northwood
exp is always in the first 3 sections.
if you have lg or Rc alone inthe first 3, then again after the break- the first LG or RC is exp, no matter where it falls.
the tricky part is when you have 2 LR or LG or RC sections within the first 3. one of those will be the exp, but its harder to tell which one.
Re: Is experimental always early?
Posted: Sun Feb 13, 2011 1:54 am
by Stonewall
SchopenhauerFTW wrote:Stonewall wrote:Your first section was experimental.
/thread.
Edit: ^ which pt wasn't first three?
None.
that's what I thought