Feb 2011 LSAT afterparty thread Forum
- EvanC
- Posts: 48
- Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2010 9:58 pm
Re: Feb 2011 LSAT afterparty thread
I took December and got a 159 and was pissed. Did much better this time and guess on SERIOUSLY about 10-12 fewer questions. December was the worst for a first timer in the middle of exams. I was taking 18 hours and had exams every day leading up to the LSAT and one day afterward.
This time I finished everything 2-7 minutes early except the LG which I got about halfway through on the last game - maybe a little more, and I filled in E on the last question of games 2 and 3. I'm expecting anywhere from low 160s to 170 (reach).
This time I finished everything 2-7 minutes early except the LG which I got about halfway through on the last game - maybe a little more, and I filled in E on the last question of games 2 and 3. I'm expecting anywhere from low 160s to 170 (reach).
-
- Posts: 870
- Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 8:36 pm
Re: Feb 2011 LSAT afterparty thread
I had a whopping bronchitis to go with my LSAT. That royally sucked.
-
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:45 am
Re: Feb 2011 LSAT afterparty thread
So did the real LG section have the paintings game? That's the only game that I remember- had to blindly guess on three questions because I ran out of time. And I usually finish the games with time to spare...
On a lighter note, I am seriously impressed with people's ability to remember the test. I automatically blocked it all out as soon as I walked out of the building.
On a lighter note, I am seriously impressed with people's ability to remember the test. I automatically blocked it all out as soon as I walked out of the building.
- suspicious android
- Posts: 919
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 4:54 pm
Re: Feb 2011 LSAT afterparty thread
cities, snow plows, paintings, movies
- taoist
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Sun Feb 13, 2011 2:12 am
Re: Feb 2011 LSAT afterparty thread
RC, LG, LR, LG, LR here.
Yep, that was the real LG. Seemed somewhat easy - at least the paintings and movies games anyway. The two LR sections weren't bad either.
If anything threw me it was RC. I took PrepTests 57 (Dec. 2008) through 62 (Dec. 2010) and never had an RC section like that - caught me off guard (damn you UNESCO!) Kept mixing up descriptivists and prescriptivists in the language passage too Was really hoping section 4 or 5 would be another RC, but alas.
On the bright side, I completely destroyed the writing sample
Yep, that was the real LG. Seemed somewhat easy - at least the paintings and movies games anyway. The two LR sections weren't bad either.
If anything threw me it was RC. I took PrepTests 57 (Dec. 2008) through 62 (Dec. 2010) and never had an RC section like that - caught me off guard (damn you UNESCO!) Kept mixing up descriptivists and prescriptivists in the language passage too Was really hoping section 4 or 5 would be another RC, but alas.
On the bright side, I completely destroyed the writing sample
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 248
- Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2010 6:21 pm
Re: Feb 2011 LSAT afterparty thread
.
Last edited by bmili on Tue Oct 25, 2011 11:04 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 63
- Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2010 1:28 pm
Re: Feb 2011 LSAT afterparty thread
LG are my bread and butter, and I thought these were awful. Granted, I was having back-to-back panic attacks the whole time, but I still usually get 100%.brito11 wrote:First time poster, need to destress after test.
I ended up with RC, LR, RC, LG, LR.
The 1st RC was experimental - the only thing I can remember from it was the African American comic strip artist.
Err...I remember a passage about chemistry and its relation to physics. Dunno which section.
RC is my strong point - and I think they were quite easy in this one. Course I could be wrong lol.
LR - no clue.
LG - didn't even get to the last one. Did guess and check for the snow plow definitely. Froo all of them actually.
Didn't sleep well the night before and that didn't help for the LG. Can anyone give a general impressions of the last LG game - easy or hard? Easier than the snow plow one?
Honestly, I felt all the LG was HARD but then LG is not my butter and bread. And I was burned out.
I feel like I missed the tricks for all of them. Plows and cities I got but took too long, so between paintings and films I had to guess on 3. Ugh.
- Pitcher
- Posts: 31
- Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 11:44 pm
Re: Feb 2011 LSAT afterparty thread
On the lighter side: Trip one or Trip two?
- kulshan
- Posts: 413
- Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2011 1:59 pm
Re: Feb 2011 LSAT afterparty thread
.
Last edited by kulshan on Wed Mar 02, 2011 11:26 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 87
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2011 8:09 pm
Re: Feb 2011 LSAT afterparty thread
TRIP ONE!!! send that peak TWICE!kulshan wrote:Trip two all the way.
- applepiecrust
- Posts: 476
- Joined: Sat Jun 12, 2010 11:38 am
Re: Feb 2011 LSAT afterparty thread
Trip 2, trip 2, trip 2.wolfpack37 wrote:TRIP ONE!!! send that peak TWICE!kulshan wrote:Trip two all the way.
- Pleasye
- Posts: 8738
- Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 4:22 pm
Re: Feb 2011 LSAT afterparty thread
2. I was so brain dead by that time that instead of making it easy on myself and calling it trip two I said "the first trip" and "the second trip" the whole time. I also hated LSAC the whole time for not giving them names.Pitcher wrote:On the lighter side: Trip one or Trip two?
- applepiecrust
- Posts: 476
- Joined: Sat Jun 12, 2010 11:38 am
Re: Feb 2011 LSAT afterparty thread
Agreed. I almost thought of making up names. But then didn't. And probably actually wrote a coherent ~700 word essay.Pleasye wrote:edited outPitcher wrote:On the lighter side: Trip one or Trip two?
Last edited by applepiecrust on Sun Feb 13, 2011 3:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- suspicious android
- Posts: 919
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 4:54 pm
Re: Feb 2011 LSAT afterparty thread
I don't want to offend anyone here, so I'll just shut up.
Last edited by suspicious android on Sun Feb 13, 2011 3:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 87
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2011 8:09 pm
Re: Feb 2011 LSAT afterparty thread
edited.suspicious android wrote:edited out android also
Last edited by wolfpack37 on Sun Feb 13, 2011 3:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- suspicious android
- Posts: 919
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 4:54 pm
Re: Feb 2011 LSAT afterparty thread
Hungover this morning, too much post-LSAT celebration.
Last edited by suspicious android on Sun Feb 13, 2011 3:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Bildungsroman
- Posts: 5529
- Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 2:42 pm
Re: Feb 2011 LSAT afterparty thread
Pretty sure this writing sample specificity is a road to bannedville. I'd recommend against it.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 87
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2011 8:09 pm
Re: Feb 2011 LSAT afterparty thread
I CLEVER!
Derp
Derp
- paul34
- Posts: 315
- Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 12:37 am
Re: Feb 2011 LSAT afterparty thread
...
Last edited by paul34 on Fri Mar 02, 2012 12:03 am, edited 3 times in total.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- paul34
- Posts: 315
- Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 12:37 am
Re: Feb 2011 LSAT afterparty thread
...
Last edited by paul34 on Fri Mar 02, 2012 12:03 am, edited 1 time in total.
- chup
- Posts: 22942
- Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2007 10:48 pm
Re: Feb 2011 LSAT afterparty thread
Nah you're fine. It was directed at the edited posts above yours. They were quick enough to save themselves from the banhammer, but not from my withering looks of disapproval.paul34 wrote:Am I being sent to the Ministry again? My legs are tired from last time.aschup wrote:
- Pleasye
- Posts: 8738
- Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 4:22 pm
Re: Feb 2011 LSAT afterparty thread
Was my reference to the writing sample too specific? I'll edit if it is.aschup wrote:Nah you're fine. It was directed at the edited posts above yours. They were quick enough to save themselves from the banhammer, but not from my withering looks of disapproval.
- chup
- Posts: 22942
- Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2007 10:48 pm
Re: Feb 2011 LSAT afterparty thread
I think you're OK.Pleasye wrote:Was my reference to the writing sample too specific? I'll edit if it is.aschup wrote:Nah you're fine. It was directed at the edited posts above yours. They were quick enough to save themselves from the banhammer, but not from my withering looks of disapproval.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login