Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=142168
The reasoning above assumes which of the following:anonymiB wrote:Because there are 102 questions, were there 102 last December? If there are 101 and the curve is -14 to get to 170, you will need to add 1 to make it equal. I don't think they will do this though, since the extra question benefits the test taker. The curve will therefore need to be set at -15 to stop scores from degenerating too quickly, that is my logic behind it. So, -15 it is
The curves don't need to be equal. HTH.anonymiB wrote:Because there are 102 questions, were there 102 last December? If there are 101 and the curve is -14 to get to 170, you will need to add 1 to make it equal. I don't think they will do this though, since the extra question benefits the test taker. The curve will therefore need to be set at -15 to stop scores from degenerating too quickly, that is my logic behind it. So, -15 it is
Death and taxes what what?Bildungsroman wrote:tl;dr
Nothing is guaranteed.
Oh snap!HeavenWood wrote:Death and taxes what what?Bildungsroman wrote:Nothing is guaranteed.
You'd better believe it.Attorney wrote:Oh snap!HeavenWood wrote:Death and taxes what what?Bildungsroman wrote:Nothing is guaranteed.
Attorney wrote:I say -14, then -13, then -15, then -12. I wouldn't be terribly shocked to see -15 but I wouldn't be terribly shocked to see -12 either.
With -14 you would need to score 88/102, is that correct? Or does it start at 100?Attorney wrote:I guarantee something between -12 and -15.
Attorney wrote:I say -14, then -13, then -15, then -12. I wouldn't be terribly shocked to see -15 but I wouldn't be terribly shocked to see -12 either.
Maybe you'll have to deal with both of those, but not all of us suffer such a prole existence.HeavenWood wrote:Death and taxes what what?Bildungsroman wrote:tl;dr
Nothing is guaranteed.
Are you as excited as I am for season 2?Bildungsroman wrote:Maybe you'll have to deal with both of those, but not all of us suffer such a prole existence.HeavenWood wrote:Death and taxes what what?Bildungsroman wrote:tl;dr
Nothing is guaranteed.
So excited. I was very impressed by Season 1, so hopefully they can keep it up.2011Law wrote:Are you as excited as I am for season 2?Bildungsroman wrote:Maybe you'll have to deal with both of those, but not all of us suffer such a prole existence.HeavenWood wrote:Death and taxes what what?Bildungsroman wrote:tl;dr
Nothing is guaranteed.
anonymiB wrote:With -14 you would need to score 88/102
Dude...anonymiB wrote:Because there are 102 questions, were there 102 last December? If there are 101 and the curve is -14 to get to 170, you will need to add 1 to make it equal. I don't think they will do this though, since the extra question benefits the test taker. The curve will therefore need to be set at -15 to stop scores from degenerating too quickly, that is my logic behind it. So, -15 it is
He's a new poster. Maybe we can give him the benefit of the doubt?bigkahuna2020 wrote:This dude is stupid irritating
On TLS?HeavenWood wrote:He's a new poster. Maybe we can give him the benefit of the doubt?bigkahuna2020 wrote:This dude is stupid irritating
The post doesn't look clever enough to be a flame, so why not?bigkahuna2020 wrote:On TLS?HeavenWood wrote:He's a new poster. Maybe we can give him the benefit of the doubt?bigkahuna2020 wrote:This dude is stupid irritating
Again with the "a flame" thing. It is trolling. Anyway, I am not worried about troll or not. It is still irritatingHeavenWood wrote:
The post doesn't look clever enough to be a flame, so why not?
LOL relax. You're only pleasing the troll by reacting to it.bigkahuna2020 wrote:Again with the "a flame" thing. It is trolling. Anyway, I am not worried about troll or not. It is still irritatingHeavenWood wrote:
The post doesn't look clever enough to be a flame, so why not?