Page 1 of 3
					
				So, how difficult to get a 170+ on your first exam?
				Posted: Mon Dec 20, 2010 6:10 pm
				by StateSchoolSplitter
				I have a year and a half to study and I'm scoring in the 150s on the real exams before practicing or studying.
Is a 170+ a realistic goal?
			 
			
					
				Re: So, how difficult to get a 170+ on your first exam?
				Posted: Mon Dec 20, 2010 6:19 pm
				by Ragged
				StateSchoolSplitter wrote:
Is a 170+ a realistic goal?
Yes.
 
			 
			
					
				Re: So, how difficult to get a 170+ on your first exam?
				Posted: Mon Dec 20, 2010 6:35 pm
				by iceland
				
			 
			
					
				Re: So, how difficult to get a 170+ on your first exam?
				Posted: Mon Dec 20, 2010 6:46 pm
				by nicksmyth
				hey iceland, you sound like a total dick.. and why buy the prep tests when obviously he/she already scored them for free? who is the dumb ass?
170+ is a tall order, but 18 months is a lot of time.. study as hard as you can, and come test date, give it your best shot. that's all you can ask of yourself. best of luck.
			 
			
					
				Re: So, how difficult to get a 170+ on your first exam?
				Posted: Mon Dec 20, 2010 7:05 pm
				by oliverdarcy
				If I had 18 months to study, I'd be shooting for at least a 170.
But, as a future lawyer, you shouldn't be downloading pirated material. It is illegal. Plus, it is not like the prep-test books are not very expensive.
			 
			
					
				Re: So, how difficult to get a 170+ on your first exam?
				Posted: Mon Dec 20, 2010 7:05 pm
				by iceland
				
			 
			
					
				Re: So, how difficult to get a 170+ on your first exam?
				Posted: Mon Dec 20, 2010 7:05 pm
				by iceland
				.
			 
			
					
				Re: So, how difficult to get a 170+ on your first exam?
				Posted: Mon Dec 20, 2010 7:12 pm
				by glewz
				oliverdarcy wrote:But, as a future lawyer, you shouldn't be downloading pirated material. It is illegal. Plus, it is not like the prep-test books are not very expensive.
+1 ethics
 
			 
			
					
				Re: So, how difficult to get a 170+ on your first exam?
				Posted: Mon Dec 20, 2010 7:17 pm
				by albusdumbledore
				iceland wrote:nicksmyth wrote:hey iceland, you sound like a total dick.. and why buy the prep tests when obviously he/she already scored them for free? who is the dumb ass?
Aw, gee wiz! Really, free? Why didn't I think of that? <sarcasm>
Don't be such a fu*king unethical dumba*ss, and I won't call you one. Fool.
Please don't ever become a lawyer; you would just contribute to giving lawyers a bad rep.
 
Illegal? Yes, probably. Unethical? Mmmm...maybe. I dunno, I'd argue that holding a monopoly over the entire Law School Admissions game and charging exorbitant licensing fees just because you can is kinda unethical too.  

 
			 
			
					
				Re: So, how difficult to get a 170+ on your first exam?
				Posted: Mon Dec 20, 2010 7:18 pm
				by bk1
				No need to get into the merits or demerits of pirating.
I would just avoid publicly saying that you do such things.
			 
			
					
				Re: So, how difficult to get a 170+ on your first exam?
				Posted: Mon Dec 20, 2010 7:21 pm
				by Mike12188
				bk187 wrote:No need to get into the merits or demerits of pirating.
I would just avoid publicly saying that you do such things.
+1
Iceland sounds like a giant tool but OP you are an idiot for admitting that for no apparent reason
 
			 
			
					
				Re: So, how difficult to get a 170+ on your first exam?
				Posted: Mon Dec 20, 2010 7:29 pm
				by kkklick
				Mike12188 wrote:bk187 wrote:No need to get into the merits or demerits of pirating.
I would just avoid publicly saying that you do such things.
+1
Iceland sounds like a giant tool but OP you are an idiot for admitting that for no apparent reason
 
 
			 
			
					
				Re: So, how difficult to get a 170+ on your first exam?
				Posted: Mon Dec 20, 2010 7:35 pm
				by 2011Law
				albusdumbledore wrote:iceland wrote:nicksmyth wrote:hey iceland, you sound like a total dick.. and why buy the prep tests when obviously he/she already scored them for free? who is the dumb ass?
Aw, gee wiz! Really, free? Why didn't I think of that? <sarcasm>
Don't be such a fu*king unethical dumba*ss, and I won't call you one. Fool.
Please don't ever become a lawyer; you would just contribute to giving lawyers a bad rep.
 
Illegal? Yes
, probably. Unethical? 
Mmmm...maybe. I dunno, I'd argue that holding a monopoly over the entire Law School Admissions game and charging exorbitant licensing fees just because you can is kinda unethical too.  
 Yes 
fify. Remember kids, two wrongs never make a right.
 
			 
			
					
				Re: So, how difficult to get a 170+ on your first exam?
				Posted: Mon Dec 20, 2010 7:39 pm
				by sophia.olive
				albusdumbledore wrote:iceland wrote:nicksmyth wrote:hey iceland, you sound like a total dick.. and why buy the prep tests when obviously he/she already scored them for free? who is the dumb ass?
Aw, gee wiz! Really, free? Why didn't I think of that? <sarcasm>
Don't be such a fu*king unethical dumba*ss, and I won't call you one. Fool.
Please don't ever become a lawyer; you would just contribute to giving lawyers a bad rep.
 
Illegal? Yes, probably. Unethical? Mmmm...maybe. I dunno, I'd argue that holding a monopoly over the entire Law School Admissions game and charging exorbitant licensing fees just because you can is kinda unethical too.  

 
--ImageRemoved--
 
			 
			
					
				Re: So, how difficult to get a 170+ on your first exam?
				Posted: Mon Dec 20, 2010 8:07 pm
				by StateSchoolSplitter
				To be fair,
They were sent to me via a site that sends big files through email.  I just know how my friend got them.
Anyway, back on topic, please.
			 
			
					
				Re: So, how difficult to get a 170+ on your first exam?
				Posted: Mon Dec 20, 2010 8:24 pm
				by iceland
				
			 
			
					
				Re: So, how difficult to get a 170+ on your first exam?
				Posted: Mon Dec 20, 2010 8:25 pm
				by bk1
				This is becoming exceedingly childish.
			 
			
					
				Re: So, how difficult to get a 170+ on your first exam?
				Posted: Mon Dec 20, 2010 8:31 pm
				by Ragged
				kkklick wrote:Mike12188 wrote:bk187 wrote:No need to get into the merits or demerits of pirating.
I would just avoid publicly saying that you do such things.
+1
Iceland sounds like a giant tool but OP you are an idiot for admitting that for no apparent reason
 
 
 
			 
			
					
				Re: So, how difficult to get a 170+ on your first exam?
				Posted: Mon Dec 20, 2010 8:51 pm
				by suspicious android
				iceland wrote:It seems you know you're a thief, and you know your friend is a thief, too.
Copyright infringement is, and ought to be, restricted. However, it is not theft. Also, your use of asterisks is childishly prude.
 
			 
			
					
				Re: So, how difficult to get a 170+ on your first exam?
				Posted: Mon Dec 20, 2010 9:16 pm
				by iceland
				
			 
			
					
				Re: So, how difficult to get a 170+ on your first exam?
				Posted: Mon Dec 20, 2010 9:37 pm
				by bloopyblooper
				this is interesting - a thread containing future lawyers who will not uphold piracy laws on the account of a monopoly.
honestly, could you recommend a more efficient service option? i am So glad that we have LSAC - if you were to apply to other masters programs, you'd see how much of a huge hassle their apps, costs, and processes are.
For example, the GRE is $160+tax, and ETS sells one small book a year to sum up all of its test problems. Also, ETS doesn't handle the entire app process like LSAC does.
Compare the LSAC to the GMAC - GMAC's test is $250 + tax, and while you can send 5 reports for free, it costs $28 for each additional one...costs pretty much balances out with LSAC (probably more expensive). The GMAC also doesn't handle business school apps.
be thankful for LSAC's products
			 
			
					
				Re: So, how difficult to get a 170+ on your first exam?
				Posted: Mon Dec 20, 2010 9:54 pm
				by bostlaw
				hahaha i picture iceland as that dick head coach of the other team on the mighty ducks movie....look it up if you forgot.
but yeah OP from what ive gathered around here from ppls nmbrs in relation to study time thats realistic.
			 
			
					
				Re: So, how difficult to get a 170+ on your first exam?
				Posted: Mon Dec 20, 2010 9:54 pm
				by The Gentleman
				A 170 is realistic, but studying for 18 months is a total waste of time. Anything more than 6 or 7 months is doing more harm than good IMHO.
You will run out of material and burn yourself out.
			 
			
					
				Re: So, how difficult to get a 170+ on your first exam?
				Posted: Mon Dec 20, 2010 9:55 pm
				by NZA
				The Gentleman wrote:A 170 is realistic, but studying for 18 months is a total waste of time. Anything more than 6 or 7 months is doing more harm than good IMHO.
You will run out of material and burn yourself out.
I agree!
Do some logic puzzles for now...you know, those crappy little books you can buy at grocery stores, just to sort of get in the mindset.  Maybe ask a philosophy professor at your school for a good intro to logic textbook?  Or even take a logic course?
That's what I'd be doing if I were the OP.
 
			 
			
					
				Re: So, how difficult to get a 170+ on your first exam?
				Posted: Mon Dec 20, 2010 9:58 pm
				by Ragged
				NZA wrote:The Gentleman wrote:A 170 is realistic, but studying for 18 months is a total waste of time. Anything more than 6 or 7 months is doing more harm than good IMHO.
You will run out of material and burn yourself out.
I agree!
Do some logic puzzles for now...you know, those crappy little books you can buy at grocery stores, just to sort of get in the mindset.  Maybe ask a philosophy professor at your school for a good intro to logic textbook?  Or even take a logic course?
That's what I'd be doing if I were the OP.
 
I would also add, OP should start reading as much and as dense material as possible.