Page 1 of 1

RC-LR-LR-LG_LR

Posted: Sat Dec 11, 2010 8:51 pm
by 2011L1
did anyone else have this? I'm betting the 2nd LR was exp no way it could be the 3rd one

Re: RC-LR-LR-LG_LR

Posted: Sun Dec 12, 2010 1:51 am
by 2011L1
2011L1 wrote:did anyone else have this? I'm betting the 2nd LR was exp no way it could be the 3rd one
???

Re: RC-LR-LR-LG_LR

Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2010 5:55 pm
by minster
yeah.. thats what i thought too thinkin 2nd was experimental but the testmaster operator tellin me the 2nd section was experimental for all types. but iono if she is speakin the truth because i feel like there were more than two distributions and some are swearing they had 4th as experimental.

so... anyone else got any inputs on this? oh yeah also do you remember what questions were asked in 2nd section? i cant remember a THING. knowing what question was (vaguely of c.) in #2 section would help us figure out if it was exp or not.

Re: RC-LR-LR-LG_LR

Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 11:50 am
by 2011L1
minster wrote:yeah.. thats what i thought too thinking 2nd was experimental but the testmaster operator tellin me the 2nd section was experimental for all types. but iono if she is speakin the truth because i feel like there were more than two distributions and some are swearing they had 4th as experimental.

so... anyone else got any inputs on this? oh yeah also do you remember what questions were asked in 2nd section? i cant remember a THING. knowing what question was (vaguely of c.) in #2 section would help us figure out if it was exp or not.
I'm swearing that the 2nd Lr was expiramental meaning the 3rd section overall

Re: RC-LR-LR-LG_LR

Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 6:43 pm
by minster
nvm