Page 1 of 1
12/11/10 LSAT.. simple question regarding experimental LR
Posted: Sat Dec 11, 2010 8:23 pm
by NYCcops
Did anybody else get an experimental LR in section 4? Yes or no.
I believe I did and I would love to know if anybody else did. I do not want to hijack anyone elses thread so I am making this one.
Re: 12/11/10 LSAT.. simple question regarding experimental LR
Posted: Sat Dec 11, 2010 8:25 pm
by LawPlz
edited: I meant the third
Had 3 LRs, and my experimental was the third
Re: 12/11/10 LSAT.. simple question regarding experimental LR
Posted: Sat Dec 11, 2010 8:26 pm
by NYCcops
thanks. I believe I fucked up. I convinced myself the 4th section was experimental while I was taking it and didn't fully concentrate. The questions were so weird. Goldfish mating and shit. Tons of questions that don't fit the traditional mold of LR. oh well. there is always february.
Re: 12/11/10 LSAT.. simple question regarding experimental LR
Posted: Sat Dec 11, 2010 8:53 pm
by m1 a1
I had 3 LR sections and I don't remember anything regard goldfish to be honest.
Re: 12/11/10 LSAT.. simple question regarding experimental LR
Posted: Sat Dec 11, 2010 8:55 pm
by lsatextreme
someone correct me if i'm wrong, but i believe every single experimental thus far has been in the first 3 sections, so unless they decided to change it up this year, i can't see how you'd have a section 4 experimental anything
Re: .
Posted: Sat Dec 11, 2010 8:57 pm
by SchopenhauerFTW
.
Re: 12/11/10 LSAT.. simple question regarding experimental LR
Posted: Sat Dec 11, 2010 8:58 pm
by NYCcops
LR
RC
LR
LR
LG
12/11/10- Satan's LSAT
Re: 12/11/10 LSAT.. simple question regarding experimental LR
Posted: Sat Dec 11, 2010 9:00 pm
by LawPlz
SchopenhauerFTW wrote:LawPlz wrote:Had 3 LRs, and my experimental was the first.
What was your test distribution?
LR RC LR LR LG
shit sorry, I meant my experimental was the 3rd LR. I wish it was the first, just wishful thinking on my part I guess

Re: 12/11/10 LSAT.. simple question regarding experimental LR
Posted: Sat Dec 11, 2010 9:05 pm
by lsatextreme
LawPlz wrote:SchopenhauerFTW wrote:LawPlz wrote:Had 3 LRs, and my experimental was the first.
What was your test distribution?
LR RC LR LR LG
shit sorry, I meant my experimental was the 3rd LR. I wish it was the first, just wishful thinking on my part I guess

i have a feeling you and i had the same setup, from what i gathered, there's actually 2 different forms that had LR RC LR LR LG, and the one i had the section 3 LR had 25 questions only (which i believe is the experimental). I too had thought I did considerably worse on the section 1 LR and prayed that it was the experimental, but everyone else who didn't have an LR experimental has said the 2 LR's had 26 questions, so...yea there it is
Re: 12/11/10 LSAT.. simple question regarding experimental LR
Posted: Sat Dec 11, 2010 9:10 pm
by LawPlz
lsatextreme wrote:LawPlz wrote:SchopenhauerFTW wrote:LawPlz wrote:Had 3 LRs, and my experimental was the first.
What was your test distribution?
LR RC LR LR LG
shit sorry, I meant my experimental was the 3rd LR. I wish it was the first, just wishful thinking on my part I guess

i have a feeling you and i had the same setup, from what i gathered, there's actually 2 different forms that had LR RC LR LR LG, and the one i had the section 3 LR had 25 questions only (which i believe is the experimental). I too had thought I did considerably worse on the section 1 LR and prayed that it was the experimental, but everyone else who didn't have an LR experimental has said the 2 LR's had 26 questions, so...yea there it is
Yeah, the third LR I had only had 25 questions. I thought for sure that meant the first LR was experimental since it had 26 questions (making the test total 102), but I was wrong since both LRs were apparently out of 26.
Re: .
Posted: Sat Dec 11, 2010 9:11 pm
by SchopenhauerFTW
.
Re: 12/11/10 LSAT.. simple question regarding experimental LR
Posted: Sat Dec 11, 2010 9:12 pm
by NYCcops
You're awesome. Thank you for clarifying this!
Re: 12/11/10 LSAT.. simple question regarding experimental LR
Posted: Sat Dec 11, 2010 9:13 pm
by 2011L1
LawPlz wrote:edited: I meant the third
Had 3 LRs, and my experimental was the third
did you have rc-lr-lr-lg-lr?
Re: 12/11/10 LSAT.. simple question regarding experimental LR
Posted: Sat Dec 11, 2010 10:34 pm
by m1 a1
SchopenhauerFTW wrote:Yep.
LR - 26
RC - 27
LR - 25
LR - 26
LG - 23
It was a 102 question test.
Section 3 (2nd LR) was the experimental in this distribution.
Ouch that hurts. I thought the LR experimental was really easy, and I didn't do as well on the 1st LR.
Re: 12/11/10 LSAT.. simple question regarding experimental LR
Posted: Sun Dec 12, 2010 10:27 am
by liltay357
I had the same setup except all 3 of my LR sections had 26 questions. Is the

mad at me? lol
LR-26
RC-27
LR-26
LR-26
LG-23
Anyone else have this set up. I cant really remember specific ?'s from the LR didnt find any of the especially odd but I do feel better about the last 2.
Help!

Re: 12/11/10 LSAT.. simple question regarding experimental LR
Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 1:04 am
by Neidermeyer519
I had the same setup and distinctly remember the first being the hardest. Something about it felt off, so I'm hoping that is my subconscience telling me it was the experimental. lol.
Re: 12/11/10 LSAT.. simple question regarding experimental LR
Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 9:59 am
by gmenfan
I had the 3x26 as well, and from what I've read, it seems like the 2nd was experi

.
Re: 12/11/10 LSAT.. simple question regarding experimental LR
Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 2:43 pm
by SomeoneInTheSameBoat
I took the same LSAT and my exp. section was section 1 (which was LR).
I had the same set-up as most people on this blog (with three LR sections) but If I counted my first section, I ended up with 103 questions as opposed to 102.
I am pretty sure the first section was the experiment; it was also the hardest.
Re: 12/11/10 LSAT.. simple question regarding experimental LR
Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 3:13 pm
by Jader
LR RC LR (exp) LR LG; all LR 26 questions, 100% sure.
I didn't know the experimental was before the break and I didn't know I had another LR section, but I was confident that my third section was experimental like 15 questions in. It just seemed completely out of order and obscenely difficult.
Re: 12/11/10 LSAT.. simple question regarding experimental LR
Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 5:26 pm
by AnthonyNicator
how are you certain that the third (26) was the experimental, and not the first (25) which would give us 101?
Re: 12/11/10 LSAT.. simple question regarding experimental LR
Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 6:59 pm
by ren2011
It seems to have been pretty well confirmed that the # of questions is 102. I had 3 LRs as well, and they were all 26 questions, so 102 has to be the total.
Re: 12/11/10 LSAT.. simple question regarding experimental LR
Posted: Wed Dec 15, 2010 11:48 am
by cowgirl_bebop
I had
LR
RC
LR
LR
LG
The first LR was rough. The second one was ok, but the third one I believe I mastered. I was REALLY hoping that the 1st one was experimental.