I was Browsing Reddit when I came across this Gem
Posted: Wed Dec 08, 2010 1:22 am
Made me think of you TLS... just sharing
Top Law Schools
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
I was Browsing Reddit when I came across this Gem Forum
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=140183
Page 1 of 1
Re: I was Browsing Reddit when I came across this Gem
Posted: Wed Dec 08, 2010 1:43 am
Re: I was Browsing Reddit when I came across this Gem
Posted: Wed Dec 08, 2010 1:46 am
I always listen to logic when someone with the handle 'jagerninja' speaks.
Re: I was Browsing Reddit when I came across this Gem
Posted: Wed Dec 08, 2010 1:59 am
My mom sent me this first post (flawed one) as a reason for why we should rely on faith instead of just logic. Must have gone out on some conservative blog or something.4for44 wrote:Made me think of you TLS... just sharing
Re: I was Browsing Reddit when I came across this Gem
Posted: Wed Dec 08, 2010 3:26 am
Reminds me of this:
Re: I was Browsing Reddit when I came across this Gem
Posted: Wed Dec 08, 2010 8:19 am
Correct! Take a ride on the "some train" right on over
Re: I was Browsing Reddit when I came across this Gem
Posted: Wed Dec 08, 2010 7:25 pm
Sorry to be a definition stickler but does anyone else see the problem with JagerNinja's explanation?
Re: I was Browsing Reddit when I came across this Gem
Posted: Wed Dec 08, 2010 7:30 pm
Arguments are valid/invalid. Statements are true/false.aevea wrote:Sorry to be a definition stickler but does anyone else see the problem with JagerNinja's explanation?
Re: I was Browsing Reddit when I came across this Gem
Posted: Wed Dec 08, 2010 7:31 pm
+1NayBoer wrote:Arguments are valid/invalid. Statements are true/false.aevea wrote:Sorry to be a definition stickler but does anyone else see the problem with JagerNinja's explanation?
Re: I was Browsing Reddit when I came across this Gem
Posted: Wed Dec 08, 2010 8:52 pm
Doesn't his last one contain a useless premise and is no longer a syllogism?
Re: I was Browsing Reddit when I came across this Gem
Posted: Thu Dec 09, 2010 1:40 am
+2 (but it's still more or less a syllogism if you ignore the first statement)gens1tb wrote:Doesn't his last one contain a useless premise and is no longer a syllogism?