Need to improve on logic games but progress is slow
Posted: Mon Nov 29, 2010 7:34 pm
Hi all,
I'm new here but as you can guess I want to take the LSAT in December and go to a nice midwestern ls like Indiana (safety) or Wisconsin (target) or Michigan (reach) or Chicago (reach). I took the October LSAT and scored 157, which was very disappointing for me because I know that this score doesn't reflect my abilities at all. I have a 2010 BA in Classics and Philosophy (double, not joint) with a 3.6 GPA from a NESCAC school. I know this score is below what I could achieve, but I have limited resources and can't afford private tutoring or a class. Compared to what you all seem to be doing, my preparation for the October test was almost nothing. After all, isn't this one of those tests you "can't study for?"
I analyzed my results and found that I did very well on the first two sections (logical reasoning, I believe), on track to a score above 165, but suddenly crashed in the logic games. I missed out on something like 14 points. My confidence was shaken and I did the reading comprehension section in a daze, so my score was better there but not by much. I signed up to retake the test in December, sure that more preparation would lead to a better score.
I decided that I needed to master those games, but I've been at it for weeks and they haven't gotten any easier. What baffles me most is how they could be difficult to someone who has studied logic as thoroughly as I have. It was my favorite subject in philosophy and I always did well. I do computer programming as a hobby, too, so I don't think my logical skills are weak at all. These questions just have an effect on me. I try to translate the propositions and rules into modern logical notation and make relevant deductions, but my diagrams and notes seem to just complicate things. It seems like my brain is overwhelmed by how open-ended these games are. I mean, the number and character of possible scenarios just floods over me and makes me go completely numb. It's like my brain is trying to figure out all the possibilities and shorts out.
Anyway, I'm feeling extremely discouraged, almost like I don't belong in law school. After all those years of Greek and Latin and logic and philosophy I put in, if I can't become a good lawyer I don't know what I can be good at.
Any advice would be much appreciated. I hope to learning more about you, as well.
Best,
tronDB
I'm new here but as you can guess I want to take the LSAT in December and go to a nice midwestern ls like Indiana (safety) or Wisconsin (target) or Michigan (reach) or Chicago (reach). I took the October LSAT and scored 157, which was very disappointing for me because I know that this score doesn't reflect my abilities at all. I have a 2010 BA in Classics and Philosophy (double, not joint) with a 3.6 GPA from a NESCAC school. I know this score is below what I could achieve, but I have limited resources and can't afford private tutoring or a class. Compared to what you all seem to be doing, my preparation for the October test was almost nothing. After all, isn't this one of those tests you "can't study for?"
I analyzed my results and found that I did very well on the first two sections (logical reasoning, I believe), on track to a score above 165, but suddenly crashed in the logic games. I missed out on something like 14 points. My confidence was shaken and I did the reading comprehension section in a daze, so my score was better there but not by much. I signed up to retake the test in December, sure that more preparation would lead to a better score.
I decided that I needed to master those games, but I've been at it for weeks and they haven't gotten any easier. What baffles me most is how they could be difficult to someone who has studied logic as thoroughly as I have. It was my favorite subject in philosophy and I always did well. I do computer programming as a hobby, too, so I don't think my logical skills are weak at all. These questions just have an effect on me. I try to translate the propositions and rules into modern logical notation and make relevant deductions, but my diagrams and notes seem to just complicate things. It seems like my brain is overwhelmed by how open-ended these games are. I mean, the number and character of possible scenarios just floods over me and makes me go completely numb. It's like my brain is trying to figure out all the possibilities and shorts out.
Anyway, I'm feeling extremely discouraged, almost like I don't belong in law school. After all those years of Greek and Latin and logic and philosophy I put in, if I can't become a good lawyer I don't know what I can be good at.
Any advice would be much appreciated. I hope to learning more about you, as well.
Best,
tronDB