Top Law Schools

Did anyone else feel that this test was unusually un-challenging, especially the games portion?

I did extremely well in the games...did well on the LR sections too....-8 on RC though....got a 164

My success with games really began with 43, where I think they begin to get easier, so yes there. But the other sections I didn't fare as well on, got -9 in RC and ended with a 162 (the lowest of my 10 most recent PTs). So if you did well, I think its probably a sign of good things to come for you (if you keep practicing and reviewing).

2011Law wrote:My success with games really began with 43, where I think they begin to get easier, so yes there. But the other sections I didn't fare as well on, got -9 in RC and ended with a 162 (the lowest of my 10 most recent PTs). So if you did well, I think its probably a sign of good things to come for you (if you keep practicing and reviewing).

Was that RC section terrible or what?

paulshortys10 wrote:I did extremely well in the games...did well on the LR sections too....-8 on RC though....got a 164

Me, too, exactly -8 on the RC. I made up for it in the other sections though, and ended up with a 166. The second LR was particularly breezy.

paulshortys10 wrote:I did extremely well in the games...did well on the LR sections too....-8 on RC though....got a 164

That sounds like a horrendous curve, considering "well" in TLS speak usually means lower single digits on each section.