Page 1 of 1
octagon test
Posted: Sat Oct 30, 2010 3:53 pm
by arabic06
hi
Re: Oct 2010 LR Question from Test???
Posted: Sat Oct 30, 2010 4:05 pm
by graham5353
wow you really need to get a grip about this.
Re: Oct 2010 LR Question from Test???
Posted: Sat Oct 30, 2010 4:06 pm
by arabic06
were there any, sir?
Re: Oct 2010 LR Question from Test???
Posted: Sat Oct 30, 2010 4:12 pm
by graham5353
i really can't fathom why you are so interested in this but..
it looks like there is maximum one question that might be of the type you are thinking, and it doesn't use numbers it just uses "most" etc.
Re: Oct 2010 LR Question from Test???
Posted: Sat Oct 30, 2010 4:32 pm
by arabic06
Gran Torino - good movie!
Re: Oct 2010 LR Question from Test???
Posted: Sat Oct 30, 2010 8:22 pm
by HowdyYall
actually i remember 6-7 of them questions
Re: Oct 2010 LR Question from Test???
Posted: Sat Oct 30, 2010 8:23 pm
by vanwinkle
This is getting very, very close to the kind of thing we ban people for.
Re: Oct 2010 LR Question from Test???
Posted: Sun Oct 31, 2010 12:03 am
by arabic06
so were there any others???
Re: Oct 2010 LR Question from Test???
Posted: Sun Oct 31, 2010 3:12 am
by Hedwig
WHY OH WHY DO YOU WANT TO KNOW THIS SO BADLY?
Re: Oct 2010 LR Question from Test???
Posted: Sun Oct 31, 2010 3:28 am
by incompetentia
Quidnunc.
Re: Oct 2010 LR Question from Test???
Posted: Sun Oct 31, 2010 3:29 am
by arabic06
well, instead of continually questioning the motive, you could just acquiesce and be done with it. or we can continue to add posts on this forum, hackney the issue, and waste all of our time. my reason is that i am a tutor, and i like the LSAT. i keep up with it, including subtle changes. i am particularly curious about whether or not there are an increase in the use of percentages/numbers type questions on the LR sections. i was curious to know. if not, i will buy the test this week from cambridge lsat and find out for myself, but i was hoping someone would just let me know!

Re: Oct 2010 LR Question from Test???
Posted: Sun Oct 31, 2010 3:30 am
by arabic06
eit - why are you obsessed with julia stiles?
Re: Oct 2010 LR Question from Test???
Posted: Sun Oct 31, 2010 3:34 am
by Hedwig
arabic06 wrote:well, instead of continually questioning the motive, you could just acquiesce and be done with it. or we can continue to add posts on this forum, hackney the issue, and waste all of our time. my reason is that i am a tutor, and i like the LSAT. i keep up with it, including subtle changes. i am particularly curious about whether or not there are an increase in the use of percentages/numbers type questions on the LR sections. i was curious to know. if not, i will buy the test this week from cambridge lsat and find out for myself, but i was hoping someone would just let me know!

We are future lawyers. Like we're going to "acquiesce" and be done with it! If someone continually asks me the same question over and over, I am not going to scream the answer at him, I am going to scream AVADA KEDAVRA/SILENCIO repeatedly.
I also... don't agree that WE'RE hackneying the issue. You are the one asking the same question over and over, honey.
Also, what if you were planning to do something nefarious with the information? ONE NEVER KNOWS, k.
Someone already answered your question, ps. Nice person named graham who used the word fathom so gets a +1 in my book.
Re: Oct 2010 LR Question from Test???
Posted: Sun Oct 31, 2010 3:39 am
by arabic06
thanks for the recapitulation of my words. oh, and your use of harry potter is so hip of you. yes, i want to be nefarious with lsat questions - that is just gay. and don't call me honey, i am married.
Re: Oct 2010 LR Question from Test???
Posted: Sun Oct 31, 2010 3:40 am
by incompetentia
Wait, isn't this an alt? You were called something different before.
EDIT: dbhdbh. This is you, correct?
Re: Oct 2010 LR Question from Test???
Posted: Sun Oct 31, 2010 3:41 am
by arabic06
i don't know dbhdbh...who is that?
Re: Oct 2010 LR Question from Test???
Posted: Sun Oct 31, 2010 3:44 am
by Hedwig
I use Harry Potter references because I am obsessed, dude, not hip.