Anyone think they went to a worse undergrad LSAT wise? lol Forum

Prepare for the LSAT or discuss it with others in this forum.
User avatar
applepiecrust

Bronze
Posts: 476
Joined: Sat Jun 12, 2010 11:38 am

Re: Anyone think they went to a worse undergrad LSAT wise? lol

Post by applepiecrust » Tue Oct 26, 2010 3:28 pm

ajmanyjah wrote:15 12 9 10 8 7 5 5 5 3 3 3 2 3 2 2 5

Pretty good distribution, I guess, especially since the law school doesn't require the LSATs

Mean of 159
UMich and Georgetown don't require their undergrads applying for accelerated admission to take the LSAT either.

User avatar
Ragged

Silver
Posts: 1496
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 12:39 pm

Re: Anyone think they went to a worse undergrad LSAT wise? lol

Post by Ragged » Tue Oct 26, 2010 3:33 pm

Wow and I thought mine was bad.

I wish they had a statistic for the people who studied really hard for the LSAT, instead of bunching everyone together. They could have a scantron question to the likes of "How many hours a week would you say oyu spent studying for the LSAT?"

User avatar
incompetentia

Gold
Posts: 2277
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 2:57 pm

Re: Anyone think they went to a worse undergrad LSAT wise? lol

Post by incompetentia » Tue Oct 26, 2010 3:46 pm

Would be interesting to intersect the study-time statistics with the score distributions.

People who got 177+ with less than 3 hours a week, or people under 150 with over 35 hours a week

User avatar
beachbum

Gold
Posts: 2758
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 9:35 pm

Re: Anyone think they went to a worse undergrad LSAT wise? lol

Post by beachbum » Tue Oct 26, 2010 4:04 pm

FWIW, my undergrad has a mean LSAT of 153. I just got back from a law school fair being held in the student center in which roughly 80 schools were represented. The only T20 in attendance was WUSTL (who had to make all of a 10 minute drive to show up). The overwhelming majority of booths belonged to TTTs. I'm ready to graduate.

waketiger

New
Posts: 54
Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2010 1:27 am

Re: Anyone think they went to a worse undergrad LSAT wise? lol

Post by waketiger » Tue Oct 26, 2010 4:13 pm

Percentage Distribution of LSAT

12 - 95 & up
12 - 90- 94
10 - 85- 89
10 - 80- 84
8 - 75- 79
8 - 70- 74
6 - 65- 69
7 - 60- 64
6 - 55- 59
3 - 50- 54
4 - 45- 49
4 - 40- 44
2 - 35- 39
3 - 30- 34
2 - 25- 29
2 - 20- 24
2 - 0- 19


Does the GPA distribution refer to the whole school's gpa distribution or only those taking the LSAT?

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


User avatar
AreJay711

Gold
Posts: 3406
Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2010 8:51 pm

Re: Anyone think they went to a worse undergrad LSAT wise? lol

Post by AreJay711 » Tue Oct 26, 2010 4:41 pm

applepiecrust wrote:95 & up 21
90- 94 15
85- 89 11
80- 84 10
75- 79 7
70- 74 7
65- 69 4
60- 64 5
55- 59 4
50- 54 3
45- 49 3
40- 44 3
35- 39 2
30- 34 2
25- 29 1
20- 24 1
0- 19 2

My school's distribution. I'm glad I go to a school with smarter people, I guess?

The average law school applicant's GPA from my school is 3.5. Heavy grade inflation, much?
A 3.5 isn't much inflation with those LSATS

mtrl

New
Posts: 65
Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 10:13 pm

Re: Anyone think they went to a worse undergrad LSAT wise? lol

Post by mtrl » Tue Oct 26, 2010 4:48 pm

ajmanyjah wrote:15 12 9 10 8 7 5 5 5 3 3 3 2 3 2 2 5

Pretty good distribution, I guess, especially since the law school doesn't require the LSATs

Mean of 159
You also at McGill?

User avatar
lennonist

Bronze
Posts: 159
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 9:38 pm

Re: Anyone think they went to a worse undergrad LSAT wise? lol

Post by lennonist » Tue Oct 26, 2010 4:56 pm

My school's LSAT stats:

18 - 95 & up
12 - 90- 94
9 - 85- 89
8 - 80- 84
6 - 75- 79
7 - 70- 74
4 - 65- 69
5 - 60- 64
4 - 55- 59
4 - 50- 54
3 - 45- 49
3 - 40- 44
3 - 35- 39
3 - 30- 34
2 - 25- 29
2 - 20- 24
6 - 0- 19

mean is a 159

User avatar
jwaters

Bronze
Posts: 224
Joined: Tue Jun 22, 2010 12:02 pm

Re: Anyone think they went to a worse undergrad LSAT wise? lol

Post by jwaters » Tue Oct 26, 2010 5:38 pm

waketiger wrote:


Does the GPA distribution refer to the whole school's gpa distribution or only those taking the LSAT?

Only those who signed up for CAS in the last three years.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


User avatar
Patriot1208

Platinum
Posts: 7023
Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 11:28 am

Re: Anyone think they went to a worse undergrad LSAT wise? lol

Post by Patriot1208 » Tue Oct 26, 2010 5:46 pm

Where are you guys getting this info? Do you have to have taken the LSAT already and then it comes on one of those forms?

User avatar
incompetentia

Gold
Posts: 2277
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 2:57 pm

Re: Anyone think they went to a worse undergrad LSAT wise? lol

Post by incompetentia » Tue Oct 26, 2010 5:48 pm

No, it's in your ASR.

User avatar
beachbum

Gold
Posts: 2758
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 9:35 pm

Re: Anyone think they went to a worse undergrad LSAT wise? lol

Post by beachbum » Tue Oct 26, 2010 5:48 pm

Patriot1208 wrote:Where are you guys getting this info? Do you have to have taken the LSAT already and then it comes on one of those forms?
It's from the academic summary report. It'll show up when your transcript is processed.

User avatar
Patriot1208

Platinum
Posts: 7023
Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 11:28 am

Re: Anyone think they went to a worse undergrad LSAT wise? lol

Post by Patriot1208 » Tue Oct 26, 2010 5:52 pm

incompetentia wrote:No, it's in your ASR.
Edit: answered above.

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


User avatar
2014

Platinum
Posts: 6028
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 3:53 pm

Re: Anyone think they went to a worse undergrad LSAT wise? lol

Post by 2014 » Tue Oct 26, 2010 6:02 pm

54% of my school is 80%+, mean 160
Damn overachievers...

User avatar
im_blue

Gold
Posts: 3272
Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 3:53 am

Re: Anyone think they went to a worse undergrad LSAT wise? lol

Post by im_blue » Tue Oct 26, 2010 7:53 pm

achilles wrote:my school is really evenly distributed, the boxes ranging from 4-8. I wonder what HYP looks like. Anyone?
Roughly:
40% 95+
15% 90+
10% 85+
10% 80+

User avatar
incompetentia

Gold
Posts: 2277
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 2:57 pm

Re: Anyone think they went to a worse undergrad LSAT wise? lol

Post by incompetentia » Tue Oct 26, 2010 8:14 pm

That's just ridiculous. That puts the median at what, 162?

User avatar
im_blue

Gold
Posts: 3272
Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 3:53 am

Re: Anyone think they went to a worse undergrad LSAT wise? lol

Post by im_blue » Tue Oct 26, 2010 8:20 pm

incompetentia wrote:That's just ridiculous. That puts the median at what, 162?
HYP and similar UGs have ~165 medians (92nd percentile).
http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... =2&t=74320

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


CanadianWolf

Diamond
Posts: 11413
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 4:54 pm

Re: Anyone think they went to a worse undergrad LSAT wise? lol

Post by CanadianWolf » Tue Oct 26, 2010 8:42 pm

I believe Harvard is 166, Princeton is 164 & Northwestern is at 162.

User avatar
longdaysjourney

Bronze
Posts: 278
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 12:47 pm

Re: Anyone think they went to a worse undergrad LSAT wise? lol

Post by longdaysjourney » Tue Oct 26, 2010 10:37 pm

At first I went to a huge state school that is ranked very low, I then transferred to a private liberal arts school that is ranked very high. When comparing the spreads from those two separate schools I was shocked to find that the low ranked state school had a more impressive spread of scorers. I went into debt for nothing.... :(

User avatar
NCtoDC

Silver
Posts: 542
Joined: Sun Aug 01, 2010 11:48 pm

Re: Anyone think they went to a worse undergrad LSAT wise? lol

Post by NCtoDC » Tue Oct 26, 2010 10:45 pm

JurisDoctorate wrote:Unfortunately, I win. My 0-19 number has a 4 in the tens column :(
Mine is almost as bad. In the 0-19 column mine is 35.

two_wheels_good

New
Posts: 22
Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 7:53 pm

Re: Anyone think they went to a worse undergrad LSAT wise? lol

Post by two_wheels_good » Tue Oct 26, 2010 11:50 pm

I don't have yours beat, but mine was surprising:

Percentage Distribution of LSAT
95 & up 2
90- 94 3
85- 89 4
80- 84 3
75- 79 4
70- 74 5
65- 69 4
60- 64 6
55- 59 5
50- 54 4
45- 49 5
40- 44 6
35- 39 5
30- 34 5
25- 29 7
20- 24 7
0- 19 24

Mean: 149

I certainly don't see myself as 170 material, but 149 seems attainable even after a three day bender. What the hell?

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


ajmanyjah

Bronze
Posts: 263
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2010 4:51 pm

Re: Anyone think they went to a worse undergrad LSAT wise? lol

Post by ajmanyjah » Wed Oct 27, 2010 4:16 pm

applepiecrust wrote:
ajmanyjah wrote:15 12 9 10 8 7 5 5 5 3 3 3 2 3 2 2 5

Pretty good distribution, I guess, especially since the law school doesn't require the LSATs

Mean of 159
UMich and Georgetown don't require their undergrads applying for accelerated admission to take the LSAT either.
I would tend to think my school has more UG to law school applicants though, because of tuition rates and language within the province

User avatar
s0ph1e2007

Silver
Posts: 1043
Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2009 10:37 pm

Re: Anyone think they went to a worse undergrad LSAT wise? lol

Post by s0ph1e2007 » Wed Oct 27, 2010 4:18 pm

im_blue wrote:
achilles wrote:my school is really evenly distributed, the boxes ranging from 4-8. I wonder what HYP looks like. Anyone?
Roughly:
40%+ 95+
15% 90+
10% 85+
10% 80+
yup

ajmanyjah

Bronze
Posts: 263
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2010 4:51 pm

Re: Anyone think they went to a worse undergrad LSAT wise? lol

Post by ajmanyjah » Wed Oct 27, 2010 4:19 pm

mtrl wrote:
ajmanyjah wrote:15 12 9 10 8 7 5 5 5 3 3 3 2 3 2 2 5

Pretty good distribution, I guess, especially since the law school doesn't require the LSATs

Mean of 159
You also at McGill?
Yea...well I graduated a few years ago

also saw a 3.35 average GPA---and most of those kids were probably Arts faculty kids...pretty sad---though I assume the 2.7 Philosophy average GPA might have brought it down

User avatar
omninode

Bronze
Posts: 405
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2010 2:09 pm

Re: Anyone think they went to a worse undergrad LSAT wise? lol

Post by omninode » Thu Oct 28, 2010 11:59 am

My school:

1 - 95 & up
3 - 90- 94
4 - 85- 89
5 - 80- 84
4 - 75- 79
3 - 70- 74
4 - 65- 69
5 - 60- 64
5 - 55- 59
4 - 50- 54
7 - 45- 49
7 - 40- 44
5 - 35- 39
7 - 30- 34
6 - 25- 29
9 - 20- 24
22 - 0- 19

Mean of 148. Not good, but better than I expected considering the number of mouth-breathers I heard at the October test saying they felt "safe" because they got low 150s on the June test. I felt like I was the only person there expecting a 165+. Have fun at Cooley, boys.

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”