UMich and Georgetown don't require their undergrads applying for accelerated admission to take the LSAT either.ajmanyjah wrote:15 12 9 10 8 7 5 5 5 3 3 3 2 3 2 2 5
Pretty good distribution, I guess, especially since the law school doesn't require the LSATs
Mean of 159
Anyone think they went to a worse undergrad LSAT wise? lol Forum
- applepiecrust
- Posts: 476
- Joined: Sat Jun 12, 2010 11:38 am
Re: Anyone think they went to a worse undergrad LSAT wise? lol
- Ragged
- Posts: 1496
- Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 12:39 pm
Re: Anyone think they went to a worse undergrad LSAT wise? lol
Wow and I thought mine was bad.
I wish they had a statistic for the people who studied really hard for the LSAT, instead of bunching everyone together. They could have a scantron question to the likes of "How many hours a week would you say oyu spent studying for the LSAT?"
I wish they had a statistic for the people who studied really hard for the LSAT, instead of bunching everyone together. They could have a scantron question to the likes of "How many hours a week would you say oyu spent studying for the LSAT?"
- incompetentia
- Posts: 2277
- Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 2:57 pm
Re: Anyone think they went to a worse undergrad LSAT wise? lol
Would be interesting to intersect the study-time statistics with the score distributions.
People who got 177+ with less than 3 hours a week, or people under 150 with over 35 hours a week
People who got 177+ with less than 3 hours a week, or people under 150 with over 35 hours a week
- beachbum
- Posts: 2758
- Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 9:35 pm
Re: Anyone think they went to a worse undergrad LSAT wise? lol
FWIW, my undergrad has a mean LSAT of 153. I just got back from a law school fair being held in the student center in which roughly 80 schools were represented. The only T20 in attendance was WUSTL (who had to make all of a 10 minute drive to show up). The overwhelming majority of booths belonged to TTTs. I'm ready to graduate.
-
- Posts: 54
- Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2010 1:27 am
Re: Anyone think they went to a worse undergrad LSAT wise? lol
Percentage Distribution of LSAT
12 - 95 & up
12 - 90- 94
10 - 85- 89
10 - 80- 84
8 - 75- 79
8 - 70- 74
6 - 65- 69
7 - 60- 64
6 - 55- 59
3 - 50- 54
4 - 45- 49
4 - 40- 44
2 - 35- 39
3 - 30- 34
2 - 25- 29
2 - 20- 24
2 - 0- 19
Does the GPA distribution refer to the whole school's gpa distribution or only those taking the LSAT?
12 - 95 & up
12 - 90- 94
10 - 85- 89
10 - 80- 84
8 - 75- 79
8 - 70- 74
6 - 65- 69
7 - 60- 64
6 - 55- 59
3 - 50- 54
4 - 45- 49
4 - 40- 44
2 - 35- 39
3 - 30- 34
2 - 25- 29
2 - 20- 24
2 - 0- 19
Does the GPA distribution refer to the whole school's gpa distribution or only those taking the LSAT?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- AreJay711
- Posts: 3406
- Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2010 8:51 pm
Re: Anyone think they went to a worse undergrad LSAT wise? lol
A 3.5 isn't much inflation with those LSATSapplepiecrust wrote:95 & up 21
90- 94 15
85- 89 11
80- 84 10
75- 79 7
70- 74 7
65- 69 4
60- 64 5
55- 59 4
50- 54 3
45- 49 3
40- 44 3
35- 39 2
30- 34 2
25- 29 1
20- 24 1
0- 19 2
My school's distribution. I'm glad I go to a school with smarter people, I guess?
The average law school applicant's GPA from my school is 3.5. Heavy grade inflation, much?
-
- Posts: 65
- Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 10:13 pm
Re: Anyone think they went to a worse undergrad LSAT wise? lol
You also at McGill?ajmanyjah wrote:15 12 9 10 8 7 5 5 5 3 3 3 2 3 2 2 5
Pretty good distribution, I guess, especially since the law school doesn't require the LSATs
Mean of 159
- lennonist
- Posts: 159
- Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 9:38 pm
Re: Anyone think they went to a worse undergrad LSAT wise? lol
My school's LSAT stats:
18 - 95 & up
12 - 90- 94
9 - 85- 89
8 - 80- 84
6 - 75- 79
7 - 70- 74
4 - 65- 69
5 - 60- 64
4 - 55- 59
4 - 50- 54
3 - 45- 49
3 - 40- 44
3 - 35- 39
3 - 30- 34
2 - 25- 29
2 - 20- 24
6 - 0- 19
mean is a 159
18 - 95 & up
12 - 90- 94
9 - 85- 89
8 - 80- 84
6 - 75- 79
7 - 70- 74
4 - 65- 69
5 - 60- 64
4 - 55- 59
4 - 50- 54
3 - 45- 49
3 - 40- 44
3 - 35- 39
3 - 30- 34
2 - 25- 29
2 - 20- 24
6 - 0- 19
mean is a 159
- jwaters
- Posts: 224
- Joined: Tue Jun 22, 2010 12:02 pm
Re: Anyone think they went to a worse undergrad LSAT wise? lol
waketiger wrote:
Does the GPA distribution refer to the whole school's gpa distribution or only those taking the LSAT?
Only those who signed up for CAS in the last three years.
- Patriot1208
- Posts: 7023
- Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 11:28 am
Re: Anyone think they went to a worse undergrad LSAT wise? lol
Where are you guys getting this info? Do you have to have taken the LSAT already and then it comes on one of those forms?
- incompetentia
- Posts: 2277
- Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 2:57 pm
Re: Anyone think they went to a worse undergrad LSAT wise? lol
No, it's in your ASR.
- beachbum
- Posts: 2758
- Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 9:35 pm
Re: Anyone think they went to a worse undergrad LSAT wise? lol
It's from the academic summary report. It'll show up when your transcript is processed.Patriot1208 wrote:Where are you guys getting this info? Do you have to have taken the LSAT already and then it comes on one of those forms?
- Patriot1208
- Posts: 7023
- Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 11:28 am
Re: Anyone think they went to a worse undergrad LSAT wise? lol
Edit: answered above.incompetentia wrote:No, it's in your ASR.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- 2014
- Posts: 6028
- Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 3:53 pm
Re: Anyone think they went to a worse undergrad LSAT wise? lol
54% of my school is 80%+, mean 160
Damn overachievers...
Damn overachievers...
- im_blue
- Posts: 3272
- Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 3:53 am
Re: Anyone think they went to a worse undergrad LSAT wise? lol
Roughly:achilles wrote:my school is really evenly distributed, the boxes ranging from 4-8. I wonder what HYP looks like. Anyone?
40% 95+
15% 90+
10% 85+
10% 80+
- incompetentia
- Posts: 2277
- Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 2:57 pm
Re: Anyone think they went to a worse undergrad LSAT wise? lol
That's just ridiculous. That puts the median at what, 162?
- im_blue
- Posts: 3272
- Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 3:53 am
Re: Anyone think they went to a worse undergrad LSAT wise? lol
HYP and similar UGs have ~165 medians (92nd percentile).incompetentia wrote:That's just ridiculous. That puts the median at what, 162?
http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... =2&t=74320
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 11413
- Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 4:54 pm
Re: Anyone think they went to a worse undergrad LSAT wise? lol
I believe Harvard is 166, Princeton is 164 & Northwestern is at 162.
- longdaysjourney
- Posts: 278
- Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 12:47 pm
Re: Anyone think they went to a worse undergrad LSAT wise? lol
At first I went to a huge state school that is ranked very low, I then transferred to a private liberal arts school that is ranked very high. When comparing the spreads from those two separate schools I was shocked to find that the low ranked state school had a more impressive spread of scorers. I went into debt for nothing....
- NCtoDC
- Posts: 542
- Joined: Sun Aug 01, 2010 11:48 pm
Re: Anyone think they went to a worse undergrad LSAT wise? lol
Mine is almost as bad. In the 0-19 column mine is 35.JurisDoctorate wrote:Unfortunately, I win. My 0-19 number has a 4 in the tens column
-
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 7:53 pm
Re: Anyone think they went to a worse undergrad LSAT wise? lol
I don't have yours beat, but mine was surprising:
Percentage Distribution of LSAT
95 & up 2
90- 94 3
85- 89 4
80- 84 3
75- 79 4
70- 74 5
65- 69 4
60- 64 6
55- 59 5
50- 54 4
45- 49 5
40- 44 6
35- 39 5
30- 34 5
25- 29 7
20- 24 7
0- 19 24
Mean: 149
I certainly don't see myself as 170 material, but 149 seems attainable even after a three day bender. What the hell?
Percentage Distribution of LSAT
95 & up 2
90- 94 3
85- 89 4
80- 84 3
75- 79 4
70- 74 5
65- 69 4
60- 64 6
55- 59 5
50- 54 4
45- 49 5
40- 44 6
35- 39 5
30- 34 5
25- 29 7
20- 24 7
0- 19 24
Mean: 149
I certainly don't see myself as 170 material, but 149 seems attainable even after a three day bender. What the hell?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 263
- Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2010 4:51 pm
Re: Anyone think they went to a worse undergrad LSAT wise? lol
I would tend to think my school has more UG to law school applicants though, because of tuition rates and language within the provinceapplepiecrust wrote:UMich and Georgetown don't require their undergrads applying for accelerated admission to take the LSAT either.ajmanyjah wrote:15 12 9 10 8 7 5 5 5 3 3 3 2 3 2 2 5
Pretty good distribution, I guess, especially since the law school doesn't require the LSATs
Mean of 159
- s0ph1e2007
- Posts: 1043
- Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2009 10:37 pm
Re: Anyone think they went to a worse undergrad LSAT wise? lol
yupim_blue wrote:Roughly:achilles wrote:my school is really evenly distributed, the boxes ranging from 4-8. I wonder what HYP looks like. Anyone?
40%+ 95+
15% 90+
10% 85+
10% 80+
-
- Posts: 263
- Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2010 4:51 pm
Re: Anyone think they went to a worse undergrad LSAT wise? lol
Yea...well I graduated a few years agomtrl wrote:You also at McGill?ajmanyjah wrote:15 12 9 10 8 7 5 5 5 3 3 3 2 3 2 2 5
Pretty good distribution, I guess, especially since the law school doesn't require the LSATs
Mean of 159
also saw a 3.35 average GPA---and most of those kids were probably Arts faculty kids...pretty sad---though I assume the 2.7 Philosophy average GPA might have brought it down
- omninode
- Posts: 405
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2010 2:09 pm
Re: Anyone think they went to a worse undergrad LSAT wise? lol
My school:
1 - 95 & up
3 - 90- 94
4 - 85- 89
5 - 80- 84
4 - 75- 79
3 - 70- 74
4 - 65- 69
5 - 60- 64
5 - 55- 59
4 - 50- 54
7 - 45- 49
7 - 40- 44
5 - 35- 39
7 - 30- 34
6 - 25- 29
9 - 20- 24
22 - 0- 19
Mean of 148. Not good, but better than I expected considering the number of mouth-breathers I heard at the October test saying they felt "safe" because they got low 150s on the June test. I felt like I was the only person there expecting a 165+. Have fun at Cooley, boys.
1 - 95 & up
3 - 90- 94
4 - 85- 89
5 - 80- 84
4 - 75- 79
3 - 70- 74
4 - 65- 69
5 - 60- 64
5 - 55- 59
4 - 50- 54
7 - 45- 49
7 - 40- 44
5 - 35- 39
7 - 30- 34
6 - 25- 29
9 - 20- 24
22 - 0- 19
Mean of 148. Not good, but better than I expected considering the number of mouth-breathers I heard at the October test saying they felt "safe" because they got low 150s on the June test. I felt like I was the only person there expecting a 165+. Have fun at Cooley, boys.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login