The STUPIDEST thing I did with this LSAT was... Forum
- pppokerface
- Posts: 205
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2010 4:45 pm
-
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 2:40 pm
Re: The STUPIDEST thing I did with this LSAT was...
flipped out on van driver game. guessed d on questions 3, 4, and 5. hopefully, praying, that god will tell me the answers were d to those so I don't have to cancel.
- AverageTutoring
- Posts: 297
- Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2010 10:18 pm
Re: The STUPIDEST thing I did with this LSAT was...
I don't get this. What is this a picture of and how is it funny (i know it will no longer be funny once you have to explain it to me, but I'm Canadian, give me a break!).pppokerface wrote:
-
- Posts: 384
- Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2010 12:44 am
Re: The STUPIDEST thing I did with this LSAT was...
Stupidest thing I did was decide at the break to cancel my score. And then, somewhere in the middle of sec 5, change my mind about canceling, after I had spent all of section 4 agonizing about section 2, having already decided that it wouldn't matter since I'm canceling. ARRRGGG.
Didn't finish my games section (sec 4) or my last LR.
Didn't finish my games section (sec 4) or my last LR.
- pppokerface
- Posts: 205
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2010 4:45 pm
Re: The STUPIDEST thing I did with this LSAT was...
the variables in the nurse gameAverageTutoring wrote:I don't get this. What is this a picture of and how is it funny (i know it will no longer be funny once you have to explain it to me, but I'm Canadian, give me a break!).pppokerface wrote:
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 1564
- Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2009 7:41 pm
Re: The STUPIDEST thing I did with this LSAT was...
OH MY GOD. I totally read "two spaces" and not AT LEAST. F--K!
No wonder I ran out of time on this game/its stopped making sense. SIIIIIIIIIIGH.
170 is slippingggggggg. I CANNOT score lower than my original score (168)
I'm going to cryyyyyy
No wonder I ran out of time on this game/its stopped making sense. SIIIIIIIIIIGH.
170 is slippingggggggg. I CANNOT score lower than my original score (168)
I'm going to cryyyyyy
-
- Posts: 3311
- Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2010 2:04 pm
Re: The STUPIDEST thing I did with this LSAT was...
uh oh I don't remember any 'at least 2'...
Damn.
Then again I don't remember much if anything from the test.
Regardless misreading a rule like that on a LG doesn't mean you failed the whole game, I've done that on PT's and still gone 2/6 or 3/7 or whatever. So it sucks but not necessarily the end of the world, unless you were shooting for 170+ in which case it really tightens things up for you.
Damn.
Then again I don't remember much if anything from the test.
Regardless misreading a rule like that on a LG doesn't mean you failed the whole game, I've done that on PT's and still gone 2/6 or 3/7 or whatever. So it sucks but not necessarily the end of the world, unless you were shooting for 170+ in which case it really tightens things up for you.
- DrackedaryMaster
- Posts: 180
- Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 5:11 pm
Re: The STUPIDEST thing I did with this LSAT was...
On the last 3-4 questions I had to guess on LG, I decided to base my answer on the basis of how that question made me feel about the test makers based on how time consuming it was to test the hypos:
(A)holes
(B)a$tards
(C)***s***ers
(D)*****bags
(E)ffing*m*mer*f*ers
Okay so I didn't really use this method, but it sure made me feel better.
(A)holes
(B)a$tards
(C)***s***ers
(D)*****bags
(E)ffing*m*mer*f*ers
Okay so I didn't really use this method, but it sure made me feel better.
-
- Posts: 1564
- Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2009 7:41 pm
Re: The STUPIDEST thing I did with this LSAT was...
Yeah I am shooting for 170+.minnbills wrote:uh oh I don't remember any 'at least 2'...
Damn.
Then again I don't remember much if anything from the test.
Regardless misreading a rule like that on a LG doesn't mean you failed the whole game, I've done that on PT's and still gone 2/6 or 3/7 or whatever. So it sucks but not necessarily the end of the world, unless you were shooting for 170+ in which case it really tightens things up for you.
I managed to answer only 3/6 questions for that game. The others were blind guesses. I know I at least got 1/3 that I answered wrong. So... I'm thinking -4 on LG which is terrible for me. I thought LR was tricky.
RC (transnationalism) I probably missed at least 2. So I'm going to need a -13/-14 MIRACULOUS curve.
-
- Posts: 196
- Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 3:20 pm
Re: The STUPIDEST thing I did with this LSAT was...
At least two? What? What? Where is this coming from? I don't recall this? I am now certain I screwed myself over on the game with the nurses :/
-
- Posts: 1314
- Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 3:23 am
Re: The STUPIDEST thing I did with this LSAT was...
Stupidest things I did:
LG section - I should've tackled the last one first and the first one last. I had a 5 questioner that bugged the shit out of me first and I spent 10 minutes on it and not enough time on the simple linear 7 spacer nurse game. FML.
LR - spent way too much time on first 10 questions in each "real" section. Experimental, I was able to do 15 in 15 but I spent 15+ minutes on the first 10 sections and then panicked. Got 5 minutes called with 5 questions left in one section and 4 questions left in the other. Had to guess.
RC - I only bubbled to 26. Not sure if I misbubbled but I was basically out of time for the entire last passage anyway. Brutal. Proctor called 3 mins left instead of five. I should've powered through the first few sections but in June I had experimental RC first and thought there'd be a chance see RC on the other side of the break.
I'm kinda freaking out tonight.
LG section - I should've tackled the last one first and the first one last. I had a 5 questioner that bugged the shit out of me first and I spent 10 minutes on it and not enough time on the simple linear 7 spacer nurse game. FML.
LR - spent way too much time on first 10 questions in each "real" section. Experimental, I was able to do 15 in 15 but I spent 15+ minutes on the first 10 sections and then panicked. Got 5 minutes called with 5 questions left in one section and 4 questions left in the other. Had to guess.
RC - I only bubbled to 26. Not sure if I misbubbled but I was basically out of time for the entire last passage anyway. Brutal. Proctor called 3 mins left instead of five. I should've powered through the first few sections but in June I had experimental RC first and thought there'd be a chance see RC on the other side of the break.
I'm kinda freaking out tonight.
- moxiepostulate
- Posts: 128
- Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2010 4:44 pm
Re: The STUPIDEST thing I did with this LSAT was...
pppokerface wrote:the variables in the nurse gameAverageTutoring wrote:I don't get this. What is this a picture of and how is it funny (i know it will no longer be funny once you have to explain it to me, but I'm Canadian, give me a break!).pppokerface wrote:
Oooooh... Yeah. I'm glad I caught the inference faster than I caught this reference. Definitely got halfway through the game before I caught it though. Merp.
-
- Posts: 114
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 12:41 pm
Re: The STUPIDEST thing I did with this LSAT was...
Good - -0 on LG, I am sure of it
Bad - changed 3 answers on LR from correct to incorrect. Rulle of law, shakesfuck, and an easy question.
Ugly - I thought my first LR was exp. So I did not take it serious enough, the bricks plus everything else screamed we are testing new questions. Because of that I did not check my answers on a few questions.
Right now I am looking at a min. -8 due to being a moron to a max of -15? I need a -12 curve, badly.
Bad - changed 3 answers on LR from correct to incorrect. Rulle of law, shakesfuck, and an easy question.
Ugly - I thought my first LR was exp. So I did not take it serious enough, the bricks plus everything else screamed we are testing new questions. Because of that I did not check my answers on a few questions.
Right now I am looking at a min. -8 due to being a moron to a max of -15? I need a -12 curve, badly.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- incompetentia
- Posts: 2277
- Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 2:57 pm
Re: The STUPIDEST thing I did with this LSAT was...
I like how this thread has gone in a completely different direction than where it started.
- txadv11
- Posts: 922
- Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2010 3:06 pm
Re: The STUPIDEST thing I did with this LSAT was...
In this case I would have guessed E on: ShakespeareQ, A&B passage, medicineQ, and several LG Q'sDrackedaryMaster wrote:On the last 3-4 questions I had to guess on LG, I decided to base my answer on the basis of how that question made me feel about the test makers based on how time consuming it was to test the hypos:
(A)holes
(B)a$tards
(C)***s***ers
(D)*****bags
(E)ffing*m*mer*f*ers
Okay so I didn't really use this method, but it sure made me feel better.
- confusedlawyer
- Posts: 136
- Joined: Thu May 27, 2010 11:21 am
Re: The STUPIDEST thing I did with this LSAT was...
If I had a chance to redo the car/driver game and the African Historiography passage, I'd be back on here Oct. 29th with a 180 in hand.
..FML
..FML
- AverageTutoring
- Posts: 297
- Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2010 10:18 pm
Re: The STUPIDEST thing I did with this LSAT was...
What inference? I believe the restrictions on H and M were due to rules, no?moxiepostulate wrote:pppokerface wrote:the variables in the nurse gameAverageTutoring wrote:I don't get this. What is this a picture of and how is it funny (i know it will no longer be funny once you have to explain it to me, but I'm Canadian, give me a break!).pppokerface wrote:
Oooooh... Yeah. I'm glad I caught the inference faster than I caught this reference. Definitely got halfway through the game before I caught it though. Merp.
LOL. And parallel reasoning #26, you'll probably want a re-do on that as wellconfusedlawyer wrote:If I had a chance to redo the car/driver game and the African Historiography passage, I'd be back on here Oct. 29th with a 180 in hand.
..FML
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- 3|ink
- Posts: 7393
- Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 5:23 pm
Re: The STUPIDEST thing I did with this LSAT was...
I concur with this as far as I can without getting banned. Maybe by 'inference' he means he realized the full meaning of the rule. Did I go too far?AverageTutoring wrote: What inference? I believe the restrictions on H and M were due to rules, no?
Last edited by 3|ink on Thu Oct 14, 2010 1:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- s0ph1e2007
- Posts: 1043
- Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2009 10:37 pm
Re: The STUPIDEST thing I did with this LSAT was...
That is a huge bummer. Sorry, Pastels. If this is your first LSAT, maybe think about signing up for Dec.Pastels wrote:
Bad - changed 3 answers on LR from correct to incorrect. Rulle of law, shakesfuck, and an easy question.
- kkklick
- Posts: 1012
- Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2010 8:33 pm
Re: The STUPIDEST thing I did with this LSAT was...
LOL. And parallel reasoning #26, you'll probably want a re-do on that as well [/quote]
How do you know what I chose? Spent a full 2 minutes on that question, doubt I got it wrong but maybe
How do you know what I chose? Spent a full 2 minutes on that question, doubt I got it wrong but maybe
-
- Posts: 114
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 12:41 pm
Re: The STUPIDEST thing I did with this LSAT was...
This was my 3rd. I am hoping for a 166 or higher because w&l is my
top choice. I took the test twice while in UG and I was not as
prepared as I should have been. Can anyone remind me what 26 parallel you are talking about? If worse comes to worse I will try to take a 4th sitting in dec. Right now I have a cancel and a 160 due to my screw ups from UG. I am
hoping that Oct is a worst a 164. I think obtaining a 4th chance is not
too difficult and since we get our scores nov 1 and the next test is dec 11 I could get some apps out and use the retake in dec without having as much stress. -12 curve could really save my ass.
top choice. I took the test twice while in UG and I was not as
prepared as I should have been. Can anyone remind me what 26 parallel you are talking about? If worse comes to worse I will try to take a 4th sitting in dec. Right now I have a cancel and a 160 due to my screw ups from UG. I am
hoping that Oct is a worst a 164. I think obtaining a 4th chance is not
too difficult and since we get our scores nov 1 and the next test is dec 11 I could get some apps out and use the retake in dec without having as much stress. -12 curve could really save my ass.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- AverageTutoring
- Posts: 297
- Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2010 10:18 pm
Re: The STUPIDEST thing I did with this LSAT was...
I was talking to ConfusedLawyer. It's an inside joke, no worrieskkklick wrote:LOL. And parallel reasoning #26, you'll probably want a re-do on that as well
How do you know what I chose? Spent a full 2 minutes on that question, doubt I got it wrong but maybe
- pppokerface
- Posts: 205
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2010 4:45 pm
Re: The STUPIDEST thing I did with this LSAT was...
If its only 3 questions you got wrong, you should be fine. Are you confident in the other sections?Pastels wrote:This was my 3rd. I am hoping for a 166 or higher because w&l is my
top choice. I took the test twice while in UG and I was not as
prepared as I should have been. Can anyone remind me what 26 parallel you are talking about? If worse comes to worse I will try to take a 4th sitting in dec. Right now I have a cancel and a 160 due to my screw ups from UG. I am
hoping that Oct is a worst a 164. I think obtaining a 4th chance is not
too difficult and since we get our scores nov 1 and the next test is dec 11 I could get some apps out and use the retake in dec without having as much stress. -12 curve could really save my ass.
-
- Posts: 114
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 12:41 pm
Re: The STUPIDEST thing I did with this LSAT was...
I think right now I am looking at
LG -0
LR 1 - who knows -5 or 6 due to it being my first section?
RC - -5 or 6?
LR2 - -3 or 4?
LG -0
LR 1 - who knows -5 or 6 due to it being my first section?
RC - -5 or 6?
LR2 - -3 or 4?
- incompetentia
- Posts: 2277
- Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 2:57 pm
Re: The STUPIDEST thing I did with this LSAT was...
165 has been consistently -15 to -20 since 2007...recently trending toward the generous side of that. With a -13 to -16 estimate penciled in, you're probably looking at 166-168.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login