Page 1 of 2

Cardiologist LR

Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2010 5:55 pm
by schark1234
Seemed like that one clearly had two acceptable answers...

Re: Cardiologist LR

Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2010 5:56 pm
by ThreeYears
schark1234 wrote:Seemed like that one clearly had two acceptable answers...

elaborate a little, please?

Re: Cardiologist LR

Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2010 5:59 pm
by schark1234
Want to be careful not to risk anything so I'll stay as general as I can. Cardiologists, computers, predicting stuff...

That enough?

Re: Cardiologist LR

Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2010 6:00 pm
by ThreeYears
schark1234 wrote:Want to be careful not to risk anything so I'll stay as general as I can. Cardiologists, computers, predicting stuff...

That enough?
enough, precessing...

Re: Cardiologist LR

Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2010 6:04 pm
by sidhesadie
I don't think it had two answers.

Re: Cardiologist LR

Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2010 6:04 pm
by cowgirl_bebop
schark1234 wrote:Seemed like that one clearly had two acceptable answers...
It seemed to at first, but once you looked back at the stimulus and thought about it, the other "possible" AC became 1000% wrong.

Re: Cardiologist LR

Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2010 6:08 pm
by thisiswater
I remember having tons of troubles with this question...can anyone give hints on which choice was correct?

Re: Cardiologist LR

Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2010 6:09 pm
by WonkyPanda
the answer was REALLY subtle and remember that there was explicit info into the experience of such said person.

Re: Cardiologist LR

Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2010 6:12 pm
by mnaqvi
WonkyPanda wrote:the answer was REALLY subtle and remember that there was explicit info into the experience of such said person.
Exactly.

Re: Cardiologist LR

Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2010 6:12 pm
by Ragged
.

Re: Cardiologist LR

Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2010 6:13 pm
by sangr
DANGIT

so was the AC about him being an outcast amongst peers not the right one?

or?

Re: Cardiologist LR

Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2010 6:16 pm
by cowgirl_bebop
sangr wrote:DANGIT

so was the AC about him being an outcast amongst peers not the right one?

or?
Sadly, it was not correct.

Re: Cardiologist LR

Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2010 6:16 pm
by ThreeYears
[quote="Ragged"]I remembered several questions alot like that one from previous LSATs so the question was quite easy for .

Re: Cardiologist LR

Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2010 6:17 pm
by Ragged
ThreeYears wrote:
Ragged wrote:I remembered several questions alot like that one from previous LSATs so the question was quite easy for .
..

Re: Cardiologist LR

Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2010 6:17 pm
by marsilni
I believe the stimulus mentioned something specific about this particular cardiologist's experience that killed a few of the answer choices.

Re: Cardiologist LR

Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2010 6:20 pm
by Flett
cowgirl_bebop wrote:
sangr wrote:DANGIT

so was the AC about him being an outcast amongst peers not the right one?

or?
Sadly, it was not correct.
Well, that leaves 3 other wrong options I could have fallen for. I can't even remember what the other answer choices were or what I picked off the top of my head. :lol:

Re: Cardiologist LR

Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2010 6:25 pm
by AverageTutoring
WonkyPanda wrote:the answer was REALLY subtle and remember that there was explicit info into the experience of such said person.
I have to disagree. This question had one correct answer and it was quite clear which one it was.

Re: Cardiologist LR

Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2010 6:33 pm
by mnaqvi
AverageTutoring wrote:
WonkyPanda wrote:the answer was REALLY subtle and remember that there was explicit info into the experience of such said person.
I have to disagree. This question had one correct answer and it was quite clear which one it was.
What he means by "subtle" is that there were only 2 choices that were in the ballpark of being correct, however when you realized that experience couldn't have played a role, there is only one choice left. Of course there was "one correct answer," nobody said there were 2 did they?

Re: Cardiologist LR

Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2010 6:34 pm
by WonkyPanda
mnaqvi wrote:
AverageTutoring wrote:
WonkyPanda wrote:the answer was REALLY subtle and remember that there was explicit info into the experience of such said person.
I have to disagree. This question had one correct answer and it was quite clear which one it was.
What he means by "subtle" is that there were only 2 choices that were in the ballpark of being correct, however when you realized that experience couldn't have played a role, there is only one choice left. Of course there was "one correct answer," nobody said there were 2 did they?
you win e-peen points! +2

Re: Cardiologist LR

Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2010 6:39 pm
by mnaqvi
WonkyPanda wrote:
mnaqvi wrote:
AverageTutoring wrote:
WonkyPanda wrote:the answer was REALLY subtle and remember that there was explicit info into the experience of such said person.
I have to disagree. This question had one correct answer and it was quite clear which one it was.
What he means by "subtle" is that there were only 2 choices that were in the ballpark of being correct, however when you realized that experience couldn't have played a role, there is only one choice left. Of course there was "one correct answer," nobody said there were 2 did they?
you win e-peen points! +2
Damn, second post and already +2 points? I have a bright future ahead of me.

Re: Cardiologist LR

Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2010 6:43 pm
by AverageTutoring
WonkyPanda wrote:
mnaqvi wrote:
AverageTutoring wrote:
WonkyPanda wrote:the answer was REALLY subtle and remember that there was explicit info into the experience of such said person.
I have to disagree. This question had one correct answer and it was quite clear which one it was.
What he means by "subtle" is that there were only 2 choices that were in the ballpark of being correct, however when you realized that experience couldn't have played a role, there is only one choice left. Of course there was "one correct answer," nobody said there were 2 did they?
you win e-peen points! +2
WonkyPanad's previous post commits which one of the following errors

A) treats a lack of evidence of a particular result as evidence that the result is false
B) incorrectly uses the word subtle
C) relies on an unwarrented assumption that Nazi's flew birds into large buildings
D) supposes what it sets out to establish
E) he had sex with a goat

Re: Cardiologist LR

Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2010 6:47 pm
by WonkyPanda
Your question is clearly missing an 'all of the above' a/c that would correctly define the situation. Thus, your question would more than likely be removed from scoring.

Re: Cardiologist LR

Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2010 6:51 pm
by AverageTutoring
WonkyPanda wrote:Your question is clearly missing an 'all of the above' a/c that would correctly define the situation. Thus, your question would more than likely be removed from scoring.
I had E as the credited response :mrgreen:

Re: Cardiologist LR

Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2010 6:53 pm
by WonkyPanda
AverageTutoring wrote:
WonkyPanda wrote:Your question is clearly missing an 'all of the above' a/c that would correctly define the situation. Thus, your question would more than likely be removed from scoring.
I had E as the credited response :mrgreen:
If it's any consolation, that would be the one i'd go with after debating between E and C.

Re: Cardiologist LR

Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2010 6:54 pm
by Patriot1208
I don't remember this one, which means it was probably easy.

[Mod Note: I also remember that I was previously temp-banned for LSAT discussion and will not test the limits of the policy again.]

Dirty mods...