lsat makers should remove LGs Forum

Prepare for the LSAT or discuss it with others in this forum.
Locked
d34d9823

Gold
Posts: 1879
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 2:52 pm

Re: lsat makers should remove LGs

Post by d34d9823 » Mon Oct 18, 2010 12:38 am

kazu wrote:
d34dluk3 wrote:What's with the influx of morons lately? Do they come here for three weeks after the LSAT before they get their hopes crushed?
And then they stay to crush the dreams of others.
Oh snap, kazu you always win.

User avatar
kazu

Gold
Posts: 1600
Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 9:35 pm

Re: lsat makers should remove LGs

Post by kazu » Mon Oct 18, 2010 12:41 am

d34dluk3 wrote:
kazu wrote:
d34dluk3 wrote:What's with the influx of morons lately? Do they come here for three weeks after the LSAT before they get their hopes crushed?
And then they stay to crush the dreams of others.
Oh snap, kazu you always win.
:lol: :lol: We miss you at SF, come baaack!!!! The deadly trinity just isn't the same without you.

User avatar
Jack Smirks

Silver
Posts: 1330
Joined: Sat May 15, 2010 5:35 am

Re: lsat makers should remove LGs

Post by Jack Smirks » Mon Oct 18, 2010 12:42 am

kazu wrote:
d34dluk3 wrote:What's with the influx of morons lately? Do they come here for three weeks after the LSAT before they get their hopes crushed?
And then they stay to crush the dreams of others.
This is what happens when you wander outside of our thread too much, you become jaded by the outside TLS world. Come back.

User avatar
AVBucks4239

Silver
Posts: 1095
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2010 11:37 pm

Re: lsat makers should remove LGs

Post by AVBucks4239 » Mon Oct 18, 2010 1:31 am

naterj wrote::oops: I'm sorry you're right. I feel like such an idiot and such a jerk. We should just be able to have a giant melting pot of forums. I

mean why can't all the forums be discussed together in one mega Utopian forum where we all live in harmony? In a free world without

discrimination we would be able to discuss LSAT in the URM forum and take the lounge into the "what are my chances?" forum.

Why not discuss Illinois in the Iowa thread and GULC in the WUSTL thread and so on and so on...

It's exactly the sort of narrow minded thinking that I'm taking part in that led to the Klan, Hitler and so much more...

I've PMed you a heartfelt apology. I hope you will accept.
This is the best use of sarcasm in the history of TLS (seriously, no sarcasm).

094320

Gold
Posts: 4086
Joined: Sat May 16, 2009 5:27 pm

Re: lsat makers should remove LGs

Post by 094320 » Mon Oct 18, 2010 12:40 pm

..

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


nStiver

Bronze
Posts: 383
Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2008 4:15 am

Re: lsat makers should remove LGs

Post by nStiver » Mon Oct 18, 2010 12:44 pm

incompetentia wrote:Hey guys, I really like LG. Their electronic are good and they are very interest
Work on your english there Chang...
Last edited by nStiver on Mon Oct 18, 2010 12:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.

094320

Gold
Posts: 4086
Joined: Sat May 16, 2009 5:27 pm

Re: lsat makers should remove LGs

Post by 094320 » Mon Oct 18, 2010 12:54 pm

..

User avatar
incompetentia

Gold
Posts: 2277
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 2:57 pm

Re: lsat makers should remove LGs

Post by incompetentia » Mon Oct 18, 2010 1:03 pm

nStiver wrote:
incompetentia wrote:Hey guys, I really like LG. Their electronic are good and they are very interest
Work on your english there Chang...
That was the point. This thread is completely unsalvageable so might as well have some fun while we go down with the ship

nStiver

Bronze
Posts: 383
Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2008 4:15 am

Re: lsat makers should remove LGs

Post by nStiver » Mon Oct 18, 2010 1:09 pm

incompetentia wrote:
nStiver wrote:
incompetentia wrote:Hey guys, I really like LG. Their electronic are good and they are very interest
Work on your english there Chang...
That was the point. This thread is completely unsalvageable so might as well have some fun while we go down with the ship
I know I thought it was funny.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


User avatar
Jack Smirks

Silver
Posts: 1330
Joined: Sat May 15, 2010 5:35 am

Re: lsat makers should remove LGs

Post by Jack Smirks » Mon Oct 18, 2010 1:09 pm

incompetentia wrote:Hey guys, I really like LG. Their electronic are good and they are very interest
Image

User avatar
incompetentia

Gold
Posts: 2277
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 2:57 pm

Re: lsat makers should remove LGs

Post by incompetentia » Mon Oct 18, 2010 1:10 pm

naterj wrote:
incompetentia wrote:Hey guys, I really like LG. Their electronic are good and they are very interest
Image
I am fan love of this miniatures computer !!

bk1

Diamond
Posts: 20063
Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 7:06 pm

Re: lsat makers should remove LGs

Post by bk1 » Mon Oct 18, 2010 1:13 pm

The LSAT should be 4 sections:

1. Sudoku
2. Arm Wrestling
3. Paintball
4. Drinking Contest

Actually now that I think about it, it should start with the drinking contest.

d34d9823

Gold
Posts: 1879
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 2:52 pm

Re: lsat makers should remove LGs

Post by d34d9823 » Mon Oct 18, 2010 1:16 pm

bk187 wrote:The LSAT should be 4 sections:

1. Sudoku
2. Arm Wrestling
3. Paintball
4. Drinking Contest

Actually now that I think about it, it should start with the drinking contest.
You're not that far off. It typically ends with the drinking contest.

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


Locked

Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”