Oh snap, kazu you always win.kazu wrote:And then they stay to crush the dreams of others.d34dluk3 wrote:What's with the influx of morons lately? Do they come here for three weeks after the LSAT before they get their hopes crushed?
lsat makers should remove LGs Forum
-
- Posts: 1879
- Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 2:52 pm
Re: lsat makers should remove LGs
- kazu
- Posts: 1600
- Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 9:35 pm
Re: lsat makers should remove LGs
We miss you at SF, come baaack!!!! The deadly trinity just isn't the same without you.d34dluk3 wrote:Oh snap, kazu you always win.kazu wrote:And then they stay to crush the dreams of others.d34dluk3 wrote:What's with the influx of morons lately? Do they come here for three weeks after the LSAT before they get their hopes crushed?
- Jack Smirks
- Posts: 1330
- Joined: Sat May 15, 2010 5:35 am
Re: lsat makers should remove LGs
This is what happens when you wander outside of our thread too much, you become jaded by the outside TLS world. Come back.kazu wrote:And then they stay to crush the dreams of others.d34dluk3 wrote:What's with the influx of morons lately? Do they come here for three weeks after the LSAT before they get their hopes crushed?
- AVBucks4239
- Posts: 1095
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2010 11:37 pm
Re: lsat makers should remove LGs
This is the best use of sarcasm in the history of TLS (seriously, no sarcasm).naterj wrote: I'm sorry you're right. I feel like such an idiot and such a jerk. We should just be able to have a giant melting pot of forums. I
mean why can't all the forums be discussed together in one mega Utopian forum where we all live in harmony? In a free world without
discrimination we would be able to discuss LSAT in the URM forum and take the lounge into the "what are my chances?" forum.
Why not discuss Illinois in the Iowa thread and GULC in the WUSTL thread and so on and so on...
It's exactly the sort of narrow minded thinking that I'm taking part in that led to the Klan, Hitler and so much more...
I've PMed you a heartfelt apology. I hope you will accept.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 383
- Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2008 4:15 am
Re: lsat makers should remove LGs
Work on your english there Chang...incompetentia wrote:Hey guys, I really like LG. Their electronic are good and they are very interest
Last edited by nStiver on Mon Oct 18, 2010 12:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- incompetentia
- Posts: 2277
- Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 2:57 pm
Re: lsat makers should remove LGs
That was the point. This thread is completely unsalvageable so might as well have some fun while we go down with the shipnStiver wrote:Work on your english there Chang...incompetentia wrote:Hey guys, I really like LG. Their electronic are good and they are very interest
-
- Posts: 383
- Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2008 4:15 am
Re: lsat makers should remove LGs
I know I thought it was funny.incompetentia wrote:That was the point. This thread is completely unsalvageable so might as well have some fun while we go down with the shipnStiver wrote:Work on your english there Chang...incompetentia wrote:Hey guys, I really like LG. Their electronic are good and they are very interest
- Jack Smirks
- Posts: 1330
- Joined: Sat May 15, 2010 5:35 am
Re: lsat makers should remove LGs
incompetentia wrote:Hey guys, I really like LG. Their electronic are good and they are very interest
- incompetentia
- Posts: 2277
- Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 2:57 pm
Re: lsat makers should remove LGs
I am fan love of this miniatures computer !!naterj wrote:incompetentia wrote:Hey guys, I really like LG. Their electronic are good and they are very interest
-
- Posts: 20063
- Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 7:06 pm
Re: lsat makers should remove LGs
The LSAT should be 4 sections:
1. Sudoku
2. Arm Wrestling
3. Paintball
4. Drinking Contest
Actually now that I think about it, it should start with the drinking contest.
1. Sudoku
2. Arm Wrestling
3. Paintball
4. Drinking Contest
Actually now that I think about it, it should start with the drinking contest.
-
- Posts: 1879
- Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 2:52 pm
Re: lsat makers should remove LGs
You're not that far off. It typically ends with the drinking contest.bk187 wrote:The LSAT should be 4 sections:
1. Sudoku
2. Arm Wrestling
3. Paintball
4. Drinking Contest
Actually now that I think about it, it should start with the drinking contest.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login