Top Law Schools

Did absolutely horrible on the logic games..... Also did pretty bad on the LR section... Hoping that its the experimental section. Does anyone have any insight?

i had:

Section 1: LR (25 questions)
Section 2: LR (25 questions)
Section 3: RC

Section 4: LR (26 questions)
Section 5: LG (Runners, Drivers, Artifacts, Nurses)

I am also trying to figure out which of the LR sections was experimental. However, I can't for the life of me seem to remember any questions being a part of a specific section-- its all a blur :/

I had the same order as this.

I bombed the first LR section...

yea i did really bad on the first LR section but again i blacked out during that section so i cant remember a specific question......

WARNING: too close. Do it again and be banned.

i had the same section ordering.

lr 1 had the antibiotic analogy question

lr 2 had the question about drinking/alcohol causing premature death


i think LR 1 was real and LR 2 was experimental...but i hope its the reverse.

LR-LR-RC-LR-LG

I bombed the first LR section.

I remember some question on the 2nd LR I'm hoping it's not experimental.

Did anyone have any LR section that had a question about car theft and higher probability of getting arrested?

It also had questions about Kafka+burning his unpublished works and some question about Epicurus. Also another question about setting a max temperature on a stove...

Can anyone confirm if this section was real or experimental?

I had the same feeling.... I wish i knew because if the first was not the experimental id seriously contemplate cancelling...... RC wasnt bad and the third LR with 26 questions wasnt bad but i screwed up LG

Yeah, I bombed on Section 1 as well. I had to guess on the last 3 and still had another 3 or 4 from earlier that I had skipped and intended to come back to. At least 6 flat out guesses in that section. REALLY hoping that was experimental.

I wish I could remember specific questions and what was on each section as that would help tremendously in determining which was experimental. Unfortunately it all blends together.

I do remember my section 2 had an Evaluate the Argument question in the first 10. And that was the only section I had that included that question type. Does anyone who only had two LR's remember that question?

LR-LR-RC-LR-LG

first was exp.

morgan34 wrote:LR-LR-RC-LR-LG

first was exp.

Thats what im prayin for morgan.... Do you know for sure?

morgan34 wrote:LR-LR-RC-LR-LG

first was exp.

Someone in another thread confirmed the 2nd was experimental (at least on the test I had)...

Rate the games section: easy/med/dif

cars: med

runners: easy

artifacts: med

nurses: med/dif

more specifically:

LR 1: 25 q's (Hoping its experimental... just seemed hard for some reason and i didnt finish.) (Cany remember specifics but it sucked)
LR 2: 25 q's (Wasnt too bad... Finished with some extra time.) (Something about owl masks i think)
RC 1: 27 q's (Also didnt seem too bad, was generally interested in the topics so that made it easier) (UN, Art Forgery, Black historians)
LR 3: 26 q's (Also wasnt too bad.... This was definately one of the scored ones. Ran out of time on the last question, but had it narrowed down so I made an educated guess.) (Cant remember specifics)
LG 1: (Fucked this bad boy up big time.... Was tired and choked, finished way less of it then normally on PT's.) (Nurses, Vans, cant remember the rest)

patrickj11288 wrote:more specifically:

LR 1: 25 q's (Hoping its experimental... just seemed hard for some reason and i didnt finish.) (Cany remember specifics but it sucked)
LR 2: 25 q's (Wasnt too bad... Finished with some extra time.) (Something about owl masks i think)
RC 1: 27 q's (Also didnt seem too bad, was generally interested in the topics so that made it easier) (UN, Art Forgery, Black historians)
LR 3: 26 q's (Also wasnt too bad.... This was definately one of the scored ones. Ran out of time on the last question, but had it narrowed down so I made an educated guess.) (Cant remember specifics)
LG 1: (Fucked this bad boy up big time.... Was tired and choked, finished way less of it then normally on PT's.) (Nurses, Vans, cant remember the rest)

LR 3: Had that hiring question that everyone bitched about
LG 1: 23 q's

ppppp wrote:i had the same section ordering.

lr 1 had the antibiotic analogy question

lr 2 had the question about drinking/alcohol causing premature death


i think LR 1 was real and LR 2 was experimental...but i hope its the reverse.

You are probably right...Cooking analogy is my 3rd LR....my 2nd LR had the alcohol at the first q

Anyone remember LR 3 having Trinidadian guppies/mating?

shinyusername wrote:Anyone remember LR 3 having Trinidadian guppies/mating?

I had A section with guppies mating. I'm not sure which one it was...

i'm hoping guppies mating was real. that was the one about spots right?

Yep, the spots. I was hoping that section was exp despite most people saying LR 1 or 2, which I thought were easier. Blahhhhhhh to it all

which LR section 1-2-4 had the billion year old worms fossil question?

I wish I could remember. My brain is mush. I want to say 1 or 2...

Soo.. looks like nobody can figure out what the experimental was for this distribution?

it seems to be agreed upon that for the 1st distribution: RC LR LR LG LR , Section 2 (LR 1) is the experimental. Section 3 (LR 2) was real.

For the 2nd distribution: LR LR RC LR LG, its a little different because Sections 1 and 2 are both 25 questions, so either of those sections could have been the "Section 3/ LR 2 section" of 25 questions that is the real section in the first distribution.

I wonder if we will ever figure this out.

man I hope so. I had SO much trouble on the 1st LR. Like nothing I was reading registered in my head.

Once the second section came, it was like night and day. I honestly felt like the second LR was one of my best sections to date. I was so rattled after LR1 that I almost walked out, no joke. LR1 just seemed SOOO weird.

I think guppies and mating and dying was definitely experimental. I had RC LR LR LG LR, and I think that was my first LR, which would've been experimental according to everyone else. Hope this helps.